### Description
This is a temp fix for the failing "Zip-Nuget-Java-Nodejs Packaging
Pipeline". The pipeline is failing because I removed NodeJS from the
build machine pool's image, to reduce the number of dependencies we need
to maintain in VMs.
So this PR will temporarily move the test to a different machine pool to
get the test passed. Then I will move the test to docker. Docker images
are relatively easier to update and maintain. Now we almost run all
Linux test in docker, except for this one. Moving it to docker is needed
for enabling GPU support in nodejs, because all our Linux VMs do not
have CUDA.
### Motivation and Context
### Description
This PR:
(1) Fixes AMD builds after #17200 broke them (Need to remember to run
AMD builds while trying to merge external CUDA PRs next time)
(2) Turn on the NHWC CUDA feature in the Linux GPU CI. The extra time
spent in building a few more files and running a few more tests will not
be much.
Test Linux GPU CI run :
https://dev.azure.com/onnxruntime/onnxruntime/_build/results?buildId=1170770
### Motivation and Context
Keep the NHWC CUDA ops tested
(https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/pull/17200) and guard against
regressions
### Description
**Fixes NPM Packaging pipeline.**
Training was enabled for linux-wasm-ci.yml but not enabled for
win-wasm-ci.yml.
the web CI uses linux-wasm-ci.yml
NPM packaging pipeline uses win-wasm-ci.yml
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
Android emulator usage updates:
- Change approach to detecting boot has completed
- use `-delay-adb` and a simple command (`ls`) with `wait-for-device` as
the first step
- this ensures enough startup has occurred for adb to be responsive
- use secondary loop on the python side to check for sys.boot_completed
to be set
- doing the check on the python side provides more feedback and seems to
work well
- make the 'stop' logic more precise by using psutil
- add internal timeout of 20 mins for emulator startup
- waiting for the CI jobs overall timeout is way too long
- value is hardcoded for now (most CIs startup in under 10 mins) but
could be made configurable if needed
CI updates:
- add template for using the Android emulator
- update CIs to use template
- reorder React Native CI
- minimize the time the Android emulator or iOS simulator is running by
moving some build steps around
- don't run both at the same time
- unnecessary and potentially adds significant memory pressure to the
machine
- fix QNN Android emulator CI as much as possible
- now everything works apart from running onnx_test_runner with the QNN
EP
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
Fix inconsistent detection of the emulator boot completing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Edward Chen <18449977+edgchen1@users.noreply.github.com>
### Description
Update NDK to 26.0.10792818 which is included in every macOS build
machine so that we do not need to download a different version every
time in every build.
### Motivation and Context
Downloading NDK on-the-fly is a main contributor of Android related
build failures.
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
### Motivation and Context
Compliance check would fail randomly but the stage couldn't be rerun if
the pipeline artifacts are already published.
There's the error like `Artifact xxxx already exists`.
We had to restart the whole pipeline if there's a random error in
compliance check.
### Description
allow gpu IO binding tests to fail temporarily.
when the root cause is still in investigation, use `continueOnError:
true` to allow the test to fail without blocking PRs.
### Description
"NPM packaging pipeline" needs to download an artifact from
"Zip-Nuget-Java-Nodejs Packaging Pipeline".
It has been a long-time issue that they two pipelines often use
different commit ids.
This change declares 'Zip-Nuget-Java-Nodejs Packaging Pipeline' as a
resource, so that "NPM packaging pipeline" will always fetch from the
pipeline run that triggers this NPM pipeline.
Their official document says:
"When you define a resource trigger, if its pipeline resource is from
the same repo as the current pipeline, triggering follows the same
branch and commit on which the event is raised."
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
Include CoreML EP in python package.
I've added to the base package as CoreML comes from the OS so there are
no additional libraries to distribute.
Updated the CPU-based provider list to add the AzureEP, which is also
included in the base package, to fix some test failures. Without this
the infrastructure thinks a device copy implementation is required
between AzureEP and CoreML nodes, which is not the case as the AzureEP
is CPU based.
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
#16989
- Update ROCm and MIGraphX CI to ROCm5.7
- Simplify test exculde file. Some tests will output `registered
execution providers ROCMExecutionProvider were unable to run the model.`
if they cannot run.
- Add `enable_training` build argument for MIGraphX pipeline.
Python package pipeline fails due to "tokenizers" compilation. Since
"tokenizers" is a dep of "transformers", we update its version and hope
a new solution had been there.
```
error: casting `&T` to `&mut T` is undefined behavior, even if the reference is unused, consider instead using an `UnsafeCell`
--> tokenizers-lib/src/models/bpe/trainer.rs:517:47
```
- we will publish the onnxruntime-training-rocm package on ADO feeds.
The onnxruntime-training package will solely be for cuda.
- Add new pipeline for onnxruntime-training-rocm ADO feeds
https://aiinfra.visualstudio.com/Lotus/_build?definitionId=1278. Only
package with latest rocm version is publish to ADO.
### Description
Improve the QNN context binary cache feature to reduce the memory
overhead and initialization time overhead.
Instead of dumping a Qnn context binary file with metadata as header, we
dump a Onnx format file with metadata inside Onnx node.
### Motivation and Context
reduce the memory overhead and initialization time overhead
Two major modifications of this PR:
1. Refactor OrtTensorRTProviderOptions initialization and make it easy
to add new field.
2. Make Python API capable of using TensorRT plugins by adding new
Python binding api `register_tensorrt_plugins_as_custom_ops`. (It needs
to register ep's custom op domain before model load. For C++ API, it's
slightly different, when calling
SessionOptionsAppendExecutionProvider_TensorRT_XX, it appends cutom op
domain to session option. Later ORT can register custom op domain from
session option before model loading)
Bump ruff version and remove pylint from the linter list. Fix any new
error detected by ruff.
### Motivation and Context
Ruff covers many of the pylint rules. Since pylint is not enabled in
this repo and runs slow, we remove it from the linters
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
Move the swift files to ORT SPM repo now:
https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime-swift-package-manager
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: rachguo <rachguo@rachguos-Mac-mini.local>
This PR introduces
- New data structure to represent kernel-level (aka node-level or
op-level) tensor sharding informaiton. I consider it as the
fundamentaion of ONNX distribtued inference.
- Building blocks for distribtued kernels implementation especially
stateless implementation for communication ops.
- Implementation of DistributedMatMul and its tests.
Code structure:
- sharding.h/.cc: Function to shard and reshard tensors (calling into
NCCL).
- sharding_spec.h/.cc: Representation of how a tensor is sharded.
- distributed_matmul.h/.cc: Implementation of tensor parallel MatMul.
Inputs and outputs are sharded across devices.
- onnxruntime_test_distributed.py: distributed operator tests.
Example of specifying sharding information
```python
@onnxscript.script()
def matmul_rs_sr_rr(tensor_x: FLOAT, tensor_w: FLOAT) -> FLOAT:
# Run MatMul by sharding x along column axis and w along row axis on
# 2 GPUs.
return MICROSOFT_OPSET.DistributedMatMul(
tensor_x,
tensor_w,
device_mesh_shape=[2],
device_mesh_elements=[0, 1],
input_shard_specs=["RS[0]", "S[0]R"],
output_shard_specs=["RR"],
)
onnx_model = matmul_rs_sr_rr.to_model_proto(
input_types=[FLOAT[2, "s"], FLOAT["s", 2]],
output_types=[FLOAT[2, 2]],
)
```
In this example, the device mesh can be visualized as 1-D tensor, `[0,
1]`. The 2nd axis of `tensor_x` is sharded across `[0, 1]` (i.e., the
0-axis of the device mesh). Similarly, the 1st axis of `tensor_w` is
sharded across `[0, 1]` as well.
C++ classes to represent tensor sharding (copied from sharding_spec.h):
```cpp
class DeviceMesh {
public:
// [Device Mesh and Tensor Sharding for Tensor Parallel]
// Device mesh is a tensor of device indices.
// A tensor can then be partitioned along specific mesh axes.
//
// Assume we have 4 GPUs indexed by 0, 1, 2, and 3.
// Let's consider some examples.
// 1. 1D device mesh [0, 1, 2, 3]. In this case,
// device_mesh_shape is [4] and device_mesh_elements
// is [0, 1, 2, 3].
// If we want to shard a 2-D tensor along its axis 1, the
// corresponding sharding spec is a string "RS[0]".
// 2. 2D device mesh [[0, 1], [2, 3]]. In this case,
// device_mesh_shape is [2, 2] and device_mesh_elements
// is [0, 1, 2, 3].
// If we want to shard a 2-D tensor's
// rows along mesh axis 1 and
// columns along mesh axis 0, the
// corresponding sharding spec is a string "S[1]S[0]".
// If that 2-D tensor's value is np.array([[5, 6], [7, 8]]),
// GPU 0/1/2/3 owns 5/7/6/8. Below is a visualization the sharding
// proccess.
// - Start with a 2-D device mesh [[0, 1], [2, 3]] and
// a 2-D tensor [[5, 6], [7, 8]]
// - GPU: [[0, 1], [2, 3]], Tensor: [[5, 6], [7, 8]]
// - Split GPU mesh along axis 1 and tensor along
// axis 0 for "S[1]" in "S[1]S[0]"
// - GPU: [[0], [2]], Tensor: [[5, 6]]
// GPU: [[1], [3]], Tensor: [[7, 8]]
// - Split GPU mesh along axis 0 and tensor along
// axis 1 for "S[0]" in "S[1]S[0]"
// - GPU: [[0]], Tensor: [[5]]
// - GPU: [[2]], Tensor: [[6]]
// - GPU: [[1]], Tensor: [[7]]
// - GPU: [[3]], Tensor: [[8]]
// Actual shape of device mesh represented by `device_mesh_elements`.
std::vector<int64_t> device_mesh_shape;
// Flattened device mesh.
std::vector<int64_t> device_mesh_elements;
};
class AxisPartitionSpec {
// [Device Mesh and Tensor Sharding for Tensor Parallel]
// This class is the in-memory representation of
// 1. if a tensor is sharded or not (aka replica), and
// 2. which tensor axis is shard by which device mesh axis.
// Let's consider sharding 2-D tensor along column axis on
// device mesh [0, 1] as an example.
// The required sharding spec RS[0] can be represented by
// - AxisPartitionSpec(Condition::Replica, -1)
// - AxisPartitionSpec(Condition::Shard, 0)
public:
// Status of a tensor axis.
// A tensor axis can be either sharded or replicated
// along a device mesh axis.
enum class Condition { Replica,
Shard };
// This field tells if a tensor axis is sharded or not.
Condition cond;
// If a tensor axis is sharded, this field tells which device
// mesh axis to distribute the shards along.
// If a tensor axis is not sharded, this field is ignored.
int device_mesh_axis;
// A helper to construct a replica spec for a tensor axis.
static AxisPartitionSpec CreateReplica() {
return AxisPartitionSpec(Condition::Replica, -1);
}
// A helper to construct a sharding spec for a tensor axis.
// This tensor axis is sharded along `device_mesh_axis` in device mesh.
static AxisPartitionSpec CreateShard(int device_mesh_axis) {
return AxisPartitionSpec(Condition::Shard, device_mesh_axis);
}
};
class TensorPartitionSpec {
// [Device Mesh and Tensor Sharding for Tensor Parallel]
// TensorPartitionSpec holds a collection of AxisPartitionSpec and an
// associated DeviceMesh. It is responsible for determining how a tensor
// should be partitioned across a device mesh.
//
// Example 1: RS[0]
// In this scenario, `axis_specs` would contain two `AxisPartitionSpec` objects.
// - The first object is a Replica, denoting that the first axis of the tensor is
// not sharded but is instead replicated.
// - The second object is a Shard along the 0-th axis of the device mesh. It denotes
// that the second axis of the tensor is sharded along the first axis of the
// device mesh.
//
// Example 2: S[0]RR
// In this scenario, `axis_specs` would contain three `AxisPartitionSpec` objects.
// - The first object is a Shard along the 0-th axis of the device mesh, indicating
// that the first axis of the tensor is sharded along the first axis of the
// device mesh.
// - The second and third objects are Replicas, indicating that the second and third
// axes of the tensor are not sharded but are instead replicated.
public:
// axis_specs[i]: AxisPartitionSpec for tensor axis i. For a 2-D tensor,
// axis_specs[0] is for row axis and axis_specs[1] is for
// column axis. axis_specs[i].device_mesh_axis = j means that
// tensor axis i is sharded along device mesh axis j.
std::vector<AxisPartitionSpec> axis_specs;
// device_mesh: DeviceMesh for sharding the associated tensor.
// Read [Device Mesh and Tensor Sharding for Tensor Parallel] in DeviceMesh's comment.
DeviceMesh device_mesh;
};
```
<del>
**This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as
below:**
- #17465
- #17469
- #17470
- #17472
- #17473
- #17484
Please review the current change by only looking at commit
e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later.
</del>
### Description
This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows
onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model
input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary
data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output.
### Examples
An E2E demo/example is being worked on.
Following is some simple demo with code snippet.
Let's first check today how we do:
```js
// STEP.1 - create an inference session:
const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] });
// STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array)
const feeds = {
'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3])
};
// STEP.3 - run model
const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds);
// STEP.4 - get output data
const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array
```
#### for inputs (GPU tensor):
Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and
feed it to the model:
```js
// new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data)
const feeds = {
'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] })
};
```
### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor)
you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**:
```js
// new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object)
const fetches = {
'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] })
};
// new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches)
const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches);
```
### for outputs (specify location)
if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location
when creating the session:
```js
// new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation":
const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', {
executionProviders: ['webgpu'],
preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer"
});
```
if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately:
```js
// new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation":
const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', {
executionProviders: ['webgpu'],
preferredOutputLocation: {
"output_image:0": "gpu-buffer"
}
});
```
now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web
will prepare output data on the location that specified.
#### read data
when you get the output tensor, you can:
```js
// get the gpu buffer object:
const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer
// get the CPU data asynchronizely
const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData();
// get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources
const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true);
// dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called.
myOutputTensor.dispose();
```
#### resource management
JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript
objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC:
- GPU buffer that used in tensors
- Underlying ORT native resources
To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web.
But there are a few resources that need users to manage:
- All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors
created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User
should manage those GPU buffers themselves.
- When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` ==
"gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output
is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()`
or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers.
- ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor
with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not
recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
### Description
this is for ORT 1.17.0 - make ORT to use ONNX release 1.15.0 branch. Eventually will update to the release tag once ONNX 1.15.0 is released
### Motivation and Context
Prepare for ORT 1.17.0 release. People can start work on new and updated ONNX ops in ORT.
---------
Signed-off-by: Liqun Fu <liqfu@microsoft.com>
1. Upgrade nodejs from 16.x to 18.x for Windows pipelines
2. Avoid using Azure DevOps "NodeTool" on Linux. The tool installs
nodejs from internet or local disk cache. But we already moved all Linux
tests to docker. So we do not need the installer anymore.
3. Remove some other unused code.
### Description
1. Remove 'dnf update' from docker build scripts, because it upgrades TRT
packages from CUDA 11.x to CUDA 12.x.
To reproduce it, you can run the following commands in a CentOS CUDA
11.x docker image such as nvidia/cuda:11.8.0-cudnn8-devel-ubi8.
```
export v=8.6.1.6-1.cuda11.8
dnf install -y libnvinfer8-${v} libnvparsers8-${v} libnvonnxparsers8-${v} libnvinfer-plugin8-${v} libnvinfer-vc-plugin8-${v} libnvinfer-devel-${v} libnvparsers-devel-${v} libnvonnxparsers-devel-${v} libnvinfer-plugin-devel-${v} libnvinfer-vc-plugin-devel-${v} libnvinfer-headers-devel-${v} libnvinfer-headers-plugin-devel-${v}
dnf update -y
```
The last command will generate the following outputs:
```
========================================================================================================================
Package Architecture Version Repository Size
========================================================================================================================
Upgrading:
libnvinfer-devel x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 542 M
libnvinfer-headers-devel x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 118 k
libnvinfer-headers-plugin-devel x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 14 k
libnvinfer-plugin-devel x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 13 M
libnvinfer-plugin8 x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 13 M
libnvinfer-vc-plugin-devel x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 107 k
libnvinfer-vc-plugin8 x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 251 k
libnvinfer8 x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 543 M
libnvonnxparsers-devel x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 467 k
libnvonnxparsers8 x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 757 k
libnvparsers-devel x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 2.0 M
libnvparsers8 x86_64 8.6.1.6-1.cuda12.0 cuda 854 k
Installing dependencies:
cuda-toolkit-12-0-config-common noarch 12.0.146-1 cuda 7.7 k
cuda-toolkit-12-config-common noarch 12.2.140-1 cuda 7.9 k
libcublas-12-0 x86_64 12.0.2.224-1 cuda 361 M
libcublas-devel-12-0 x86_64 12.0.2.224-1 cuda 397 M
Transaction Summary
========================================================================================================================
```
As you can see from the output, they are CUDA 12 packages.
The problem can also be solved by lock the packages' versions by using
"dnf versionlock" command right after installing the CUDA/TRT packages.
However, going forward, to get the better reproducibility, I suggest
manually fix dnf package versions in the installation scripts like we do
for TRT now.
```bash
v="8.6.1.6-1.cuda11.8" &&\
yum-config-manager --add-repo https://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/repos/rhel8/x86_64/cuda-rhel8.repo &&\
yum -y install libnvinfer8-${v} libnvparsers8-${v} libnvonnxparsers8-${v} libnvinfer-plugin8-${v} libnvinfer-vc-plugin8-${v}\
libnvinfer-devel-${v} libnvparsers-devel-${v} libnvonnxparsers-devel-${v} libnvinfer-plugin-devel-${v} libnvinfer-vc-plugin-devel-${v} libnvinfer-headers-devel-${v} libnvinfer-headers-plugin-devel-${v}
```
When we have a need to upgrade a package due to security alert or some
other reasons, we manually change the version string instead of relying
on "dnf update". Though this approach increases efforts, it can make our
pipeines more stable.
2. Move python test to docker
### Motivation and Context
Right now the nightly gpu package mixes using CUDA 11.x and CUDA 12.x
and the result package is totally not usable(crashes every time)
### Description
Include onnxruntime_float16.h in the package.
### Motivation and Context
This was missed in the recently released 1.16 pkgs (except Nuget).
manylinux build is used for nightly packaging generation and it's hard
to capture issue in time when related files change. This PR add
manylinux build in CI.
### Description
1. use standard win build template
2. enable compiler cache
### Motivation and Context
Make win build task easy to maintain and accelerate the pipeline.
### Description
PR 15470 updated some C/C++ dependencies. The change caused ROCM EP's
nightly build to fail. see issue
https://github.com/ROCm-Developer-Tools/HIP/issues/2082 for a
background. So, the root cause is HIP compiler has a special requirement
that HIP's include dirs must be used before the operating system's
include folder: /usr/include. HIP adds "-isystem" in front of
"/usr/include". gcc or clang will search the folders added with "-I"
first, then the "-isystem" folder. It works fine as long as we do not
add "-I/usr/include" to the compile commands for *.cu files. It would be wrong if
we already have installed an open source library to /usr and want to use the
prebuilt library from there instead of the current build dir.
### Motivation and Context
### Description
supplement of #17417
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
The name of nightly ACPT image has been updated to
`ptebic.azurecr.io/internal/aifx/acpt/nightly-ubuntu-cuda-torch-dev`
As the previous image alias had `cu118`, `torch210dev` or `py38`, any
version update will break the training nightly pipeline
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
Using constant image alias to avoid pipeline failure.
### Description
Delete all Prefast tasks because the new VS 17.7 version crashes every
time when we run the task on our CI build servers. However, we cannot
reproduce it locally. And this problem blocks us installing security
patches to our CI build machines.
Will use [CodeQL](https://codeql.github.com/) instead.
### Motivation and Context
Address some security alerts.
The old provisioning profile no longer works. Switched to a temporary one that we can use before a new one is available. The temporary one has a different name.
### Description
Updates the version of QNN SDK used by CI Pipelines. Enables some tests
fixed by 2.14.1, but still need to look into Resize in a separate PR.
### Motivation and Context
Test latest version of QNN SDK.
### Description
Update the Web CI pipelines:
- remove parameter 'WebTemplate': Since we start to support webgpu, the
linux-web-ci.yml is no longer working and it is already out-of-date.
remove this file and parameter so that we always use win-web-ci.yml
- change flag `RunWebGpuTests` into 2 flags, for release and debug.
Currently for CI we only run webgpu tests on release build. But we want
to have the capability to run webgpu tests on debug build as well.
After this PR is merged, next step is to enable both Debug and Release
webgpu tests in PostMerge pipeline.
### Description
[Successful pipeline
run](https://dev.azure.com/onnxruntime/onnxruntime/_build/results?buildId=1123141&view=results)
Added flag to build the training artifacts & updated the
pull-wasm-artifacts script to pull the training artifacts as well.
Bundled into this PR are minor formatting fixes + naming fixes.
### Motivation and Context
[This PR](https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/pull/16521) extended
the WASM API wrapper to build training WASM artifacts as well.
The ORT training WASM artifacts are required to support ORT training web
bindings.
### Description
The yaml file changes made in #16050 do not really work. Currently the
pipeline is failing with error:
```
Error: Not found SourceFolder: C:\a\_work\5\b\RelWithDebInfo\RelWithDebInfo\nuget-artifacts\onnxruntime-win-x64\lib
```
So, I will revert the yaml changes first to bring the pipeline back.
Some people are waiting for our nightly packages.
Test run:
https://aiinfra.visualstudio.com/Lotus/_build/results?buildId=351104&view=results
### Motivation and Context
### Description
install dotnet 6.0 in the docker image.
move C# build and test into docker.
### Motivation and Context
### Note
The Unit tests and Symbolic shape infer's migration will be in another
PR.
