fips205.wots_loop1_eq (Proofs/WotsSpec.lean): the extracted WOTS+ chain loop wots_pk_from_sig_free_loop1 = the explicit fold that, at each index i in [0, LEN), sets the chain address to i and runs chain_free on sig[i] starting at digit msg[i] for W-1-msg[i] steps, writing tmp[i]. This is the layer above chain: it CONSUMES chain_free and machine-checks that the LEN chains are run with the right start indices, step counts, and output slots — the WOTS+ verification recomputation. Cone stays clean: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f] — the loop uses the REAL Aeneas StepUsize (usize range, no plumbing axiom) and calls chain_free/index_usize/update, all real; the try_from / Take-iterator / base_2b input-prep plumbing lives in the enclosing wots_pk_from_sig_free, NOT in this loop. Proof mirrors ChainSpec, reusing the generic loop_unfold_bind: usize_succ + fwd_succ_usize + hnext_usize (StepUsize iterator step), hbody1 (loop body as clean do-block), wots_loop1_step (one loop step = one fold step), wots_loop1_eq (induction, IH under the fatter binds via bind_congr x8). No sorry; check.sh green over BOTH certificates with the axiom audit. The chain-proof patterns transferred one-for-one to the next layer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.6 KiB
fips205-slhdsa-verified
Machine-checked verification campaign for the SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) verify
path, extracted from a pure-Rust implementation into Lean 4 via
Charon/Aeneas — the same pipeline, discipline, and honesty rules as the
four ed25519 campaigns (dalek/anza/risc0/betrusted-ed25519-verified).
STATUS: TWO CERTIFICATES PROVEN — chain (Alg 5) + WOTS+ chain loop (Alg 8)
verification/check.sh is green (exit 0): the model compiles, the
proofs compile, and the axiom audit passes. One certificate proven so
far:
-
fips205.chain_free_loop_eq(Algorithm 5, WOTS+ chaining): the extractedchain_freeloop equals the explicit s-fold hash chain, with the hash address set to i, i+1, …, i+s−1 in turn. This rules out — machine-checked, for the deployed monomorphic SHA2-128s verify path — an off-by-one loop bound, a wrong address field, and wrong threading. Its#print axiomscone is exactly[propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f]— the three kernel axioms plus the one hash oracle it touches, and nothing else (no transpiler plumbing; the u32 range machinery was discharged with real definitions). check.sh Phase 3 fails the build if any certificate cone contains anything outside the kernel three + the five documented SHA-2 oracles. -
fips205.wots_loop1_eq(Algorithm 8, WOTS+ pk recomputation — the chain loop): the extractedwots_pk_from_sig_free_loop1equals the fold that, at each index i in [0, LEN), sets the chain address to i and runschain_freeon sig[i] starting at digit msg[i] for W−1−msg[i] steps, writing tmp[i]. This is the layer above chain: it consumeschain_freeand pins that the LEN chains run with the right start indices, step counts, and slots. Cone: kernel three +verify_mono.oracle.f.
Foundations behind this (2026-07-22/23): the Aeneas-compat patch (additive
monomorphic verify module through a named oracle boundary; charon + aeneas
exit 0); the u32 range-loop de-plumbing (faithful Step defs vs pinned
rustc, axiom-clean); fidelity pinned by a differential test in the snapshot
(valid / corrupted / wrong-message).
The remaining layers (WOTS+ pk, XMSS path, hypertree, FORS, apex) are not yet proven — the pyramid rises one certificate at a time, each audited to the same boundary.
Subject
- Upstream:
integritychain/fips205— pure-Rust FIPS 205 (final standard, 2024-08-13), zerounsafe,no_std, const-generic parameterization, modules mirroring the FIPS 205 algorithm structure. - Pinned at upstream commit
30bac08580aa61f653e5436d1bbacb5ffac446c4(2025-09-01), snapshotted with full history atsaymrwulf/fips205-source(snapshot head5dca0db, whose single deviation from verbatim is the removal of upstream CI workflows, documented in that commit). Aeneas-compat patches will land in the snapshot repo as transparent, individually-justified commits — never upstream. No affiliation with, and no changes proposed to, the upstream project. - Parameter set: SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s first (the small-signature profile deployed in the firmware/code-signing lane). The architecture generalizes; each further parameter set is a separate claim (rigor invariant R2).
Scope
Verify path only. The extraction cone, mirroring FIPS 205's own algorithm tree:
slh_verify -> slh_verify_internal
-> fors_pk_from_sig
-> ht_verify -> xmss_pk_from_sig -> wots_pk_from_sig -> chain
Key generation and signing are out of scope (trusted base), exactly as
ed25519 signing was. The five verify-path hash oracles (h_msg, f, h, t_l, t_len — SHA-2 instantiations; prf/prf_msg are sign-side only
and never enter the cone) are opaque external models with written
justifications, kept outside every certificate's dependency cone
(honesty invariant H4); their semantics are the standing SHA-2 oracle
boundary documented in TRUSTED-BASE.md.
Gate-0 record (2026-07-22)
Per TARGETS.md ("re-verify before use"), the subject was probed before this repository was created:
- Charon: clean (
charon cargo --preset=aeneas, roots at the verify cone,sha2/sha3/zeroize/rand_coreopaque, featuresslh_dsa_sha2_128s) — LLBC produced, exit 0. - Aeneas: translated the entire const-generic verify cone to Lean
definitions (
wots.chain…slh.slh_verify_internalall generated), with exactly one obstruction class (3 unique errors): thecrate::hashers::Hashersstruct of plain function pointers cannot be translated. - Phase 1 — DONE (2026-07-22): the Aeneas-compat patch landed in
fips205-source(snapshot2d89ee3): an additive monomorphic SHA2-128s verify module (src/verify_mono.rs) whose hash suite is reached through named free functions inverify_mono::oracle(marked opaque at the Charon boundary) — thesha512_*-shim pattern. Two further compat refinements: the message-digest input M' passes as a single&[u8](nested&[&[u8]]is untranslatable), and onelet-elsebecame theis_err/unwrapidiom.verification/extract.shnow re-derives the model from the mono root; charon + aeneas both exit 0, andverification/check.shcompiles the result. The generic paths and all twelve parameter sets are untouched (the only change to existing code is two lines wiring the module).
What will be claimed (when the button is green, not before)
One theorem per layer, each a statement about the extracted functions
(H3), compiled by verification/check.sh with a per-certificate
#print axioms audit (H1): chain semantics, WOTS+ pk recomputation,
XMSS path recomputation, hypertree acceptance, FORS pk recomputation,
and the apex — slh_verify_internal accepts iff the recomputed
hypertree root equals the pinned public-key root.
The allowed axiom set, stated precisely: unlike the ed25519 field and
scalar layers (whose cones are exactly [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]), the hash oracles permeate every SLH-DSA layer — chain
already calls F. So each certificate's cone may contain the three
kernel axioms plus at most the five named oracles
(verify_mono.oracle.{h_msg, f, h, t_l, t_len}) — and nothing else: the
transpiler-plumbing axioms currently in FunsExternal.lean must be
discharged before any certificate ships, and the audit fails the button
if any of them (or anything unlisted) appears in a cone.
Discipline
Every Lean compile in this repository runs under verification/lean-guard
(memory-capped, machine-wide serialized). Extraction is reproducible from
the committed extract.sh against the pinned snapshot (R1). What cannot
be proven is named in TRUSTED-BASE.md, not hidden (H5).