Machine-checked verification campaign for the SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) verify path: Rust (fips205-source) -> Charon/Aeneas -> Lean 4. Parameter set SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s first. STATUS: skeleton - nothing proven yet.
Find a file
mrwulf 84cd00d377 phase 2: SECOND CERTIFICATE — WOTS+ chain loop (Algorithm 8) proven
fips205.wots_loop1_eq (Proofs/WotsSpec.lean): the extracted WOTS+ chain
loop wots_pk_from_sig_free_loop1 = the explicit fold that, at each index
i in [0, LEN), sets the chain address to i and runs chain_free on sig[i]
starting at digit msg[i] for W-1-msg[i] steps, writing tmp[i]. This is
the layer above chain: it CONSUMES chain_free and machine-checks that the
LEN chains are run with the right start indices, step counts, and output
slots — the WOTS+ verification recomputation.

Cone stays clean: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound,
verify_mono.oracle.f] — the loop uses the REAL Aeneas StepUsize (usize
range, no plumbing axiom) and calls chain_free/index_usize/update, all
real; the try_from / Take-iterator / base_2b input-prep plumbing lives in
the enclosing wots_pk_from_sig_free, NOT in this loop.

Proof mirrors ChainSpec, reusing the generic loop_unfold_bind: usize_succ
+ fwd_succ_usize + hnext_usize (StepUsize iterator step), hbody1 (loop
body as clean do-block), wots_loop1_step (one loop step = one fold step),
wots_loop1_eq (induction, IH under the fatter binds via bind_congr x8).
No sorry; check.sh green over BOTH certificates with the axiom audit.

The chain-proof patterns transferred one-for-one to the next layer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 14:48:39 +02:00
verification phase 2: SECOND CERTIFICATE — WOTS+ chain loop (Algorithm 8) proven 2026-07-23 14:48:39 +02:00
.gitignore Phase 1: clean extraction + type-checking SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s model 2026-07-22 22:21:19 +02:00
README.md phase 2: SECOND CERTIFICATE — WOTS+ chain loop (Algorithm 8) proven 2026-07-23 14:48:39 +02:00
TRUSTED-BASE.md audit catch 2: the oracle boundary is FIVE, not six 2026-07-22 23:02:40 +02:00

fips205-slhdsa-verified

Machine-checked verification campaign for the SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) verify path, extracted from a pure-Rust implementation into Lean 4 via Charon/Aeneas — the same pipeline, discipline, and honesty rules as the four ed25519 campaigns (dalek/anza/risc0/betrusted-ed25519-verified).

STATUS: TWO CERTIFICATES PROVEN — chain (Alg 5) + WOTS+ chain loop (Alg 8)

verification/check.sh is green (exit 0): the model compiles, the proofs compile, and the axiom audit passes. One certificate proven so far:

  • fips205.chain_free_loop_eq (Algorithm 5, WOTS+ chaining): the extracted chain_free loop equals the explicit s-fold hash chain, with the hash address set to i, i+1, …, i+s1 in turn. This rules out — machine-checked, for the deployed monomorphic SHA2-128s verify path — an off-by-one loop bound, a wrong address field, and wrong threading. Its #print axioms cone is exactly [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f] — the three kernel axioms plus the one hash oracle it touches, and nothing else (no transpiler plumbing; the u32 range machinery was discharged with real definitions). check.sh Phase 3 fails the build if any certificate cone contains anything outside the kernel three + the five documented SHA-2 oracles.

  • fips205.wots_loop1_eq (Algorithm 8, WOTS+ pk recomputation — the chain loop): the extracted wots_pk_from_sig_free_loop1 equals the fold that, at each index i in [0, LEN), sets the chain address to i and runs chain_free on sig[i] starting at digit msg[i] for W1msg[i] steps, writing tmp[i]. This is the layer above chain: it consumes chain_free and pins that the LEN chains run with the right start indices, step counts, and slots. Cone: kernel three + verify_mono.oracle.f.

Foundations behind this (2026-07-22/23): the Aeneas-compat patch (additive monomorphic verify module through a named oracle boundary; charon + aeneas exit 0); the u32 range-loop de-plumbing (faithful Step defs vs pinned rustc, axiom-clean); fidelity pinned by a differential test in the snapshot (valid / corrupted / wrong-message).

The remaining layers (WOTS+ pk, XMSS path, hypertree, FORS, apex) are not yet proven — the pyramid rises one certificate at a time, each audited to the same boundary.

Subject

  • Upstream: integritychain/fips205 — pure-Rust FIPS 205 (final standard, 2024-08-13), zero unsafe, no_std, const-generic parameterization, modules mirroring the FIPS 205 algorithm structure.
  • Pinned at upstream commit 30bac08580aa61f653e5436d1bbacb5ffac446c4 (2025-09-01), snapshotted with full history at saymrwulf/fips205-source (snapshot head 5dca0db, whose single deviation from verbatim is the removal of upstream CI workflows, documented in that commit). Aeneas-compat patches will land in the snapshot repo as transparent, individually-justified commits — never upstream. No affiliation with, and no changes proposed to, the upstream project.
  • Parameter set: SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s first (the small-signature profile deployed in the firmware/code-signing lane). The architecture generalizes; each further parameter set is a separate claim (rigor invariant R2).

Scope

Verify path only. The extraction cone, mirroring FIPS 205's own algorithm tree:

slh_verify -> slh_verify_internal
  -> fors_pk_from_sig
  -> ht_verify -> xmss_pk_from_sig -> wots_pk_from_sig -> chain

Key generation and signing are out of scope (trusted base), exactly as ed25519 signing was. The five verify-path hash oracles (h_msg, f, h, t_l, t_len — SHA-2 instantiations; prf/prf_msg are sign-side only and never enter the cone) are opaque external models with written justifications, kept outside every certificate's dependency cone (honesty invariant H4); their semantics are the standing SHA-2 oracle boundary documented in TRUSTED-BASE.md.

Gate-0 record (2026-07-22)

Per TARGETS.md ("re-verify before use"), the subject was probed before this repository was created:

  • Charon: clean (charon cargo --preset=aeneas, roots at the verify cone, sha2/sha3/zeroize/rand_core opaque, features slh_dsa_sha2_128s) — LLBC produced, exit 0.
  • Aeneas: translated the entire const-generic verify cone to Lean definitions (wots.chainslh.slh_verify_internal all generated), with exactly one obstruction class (3 unique errors): the crate::hashers::Hashers struct of plain function pointers cannot be translated.
  • Phase 1 — DONE (2026-07-22): the Aeneas-compat patch landed in fips205-source (snapshot 2d89ee3): an additive monomorphic SHA2-128s verify module (src/verify_mono.rs) whose hash suite is reached through named free functions in verify_mono::oracle (marked opaque at the Charon boundary) — the sha512_*-shim pattern. Two further compat refinements: the message-digest input M' passes as a single &[u8] (nested &[&[u8]] is untranslatable), and one let-else became the is_err/unwrap idiom. verification/extract.sh now re-derives the model from the mono root; charon + aeneas both exit 0, and verification/check.sh compiles the result. The generic paths and all twelve parameter sets are untouched (the only change to existing code is two lines wiring the module).

What will be claimed (when the button is green, not before)

One theorem per layer, each a statement about the extracted functions (H3), compiled by verification/check.sh with a per-certificate #print axioms audit (H1): chain semantics, WOTS+ pk recomputation, XMSS path recomputation, hypertree acceptance, FORS pk recomputation, and the apex — slh_verify_internal accepts iff the recomputed hypertree root equals the pinned public-key root.

The allowed axiom set, stated precisely: unlike the ed25519 field and scalar layers (whose cones are exactly [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]), the hash oracles permeate every SLH-DSA layer — chain already calls F. So each certificate's cone may contain the three kernel axioms plus at most the five named oracles (verify_mono.oracle.{h_msg, f, h, t_l, t_len}) — and nothing else: the transpiler-plumbing axioms currently in FunsExternal.lean must be discharged before any certificate ships, and the audit fails the button if any of them (or anything unlisted) appears in a cone.

Discipline

Every Lean compile in this repository runs under verification/lean-guard (memory-capped, machine-wide serialized). Extraction is reproducible from the committed extract.sh against the pinned snapshot (R1). What cannot be proven is named in TRUSTED-BASE.md, not hidden (H5).