### Description
1. Remove Windows ARM32 from nuget packaging pipelines
2. Add missing component-governance-component-detection-steps.yml to
some build jobs.
### Motivation and Context
Stop supporting Windows ARM32 to align with [Windows's support
policy](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/arm/arm32-to-arm64).
Users who need this feature still can build the DLLs from source.
However, later on we will remove that support too.
### Description
1. Update donwload-artifacts to flex-downloadartifacts to make it eaiser
to debug.
2. Move the native files into Gpu.Windows and Gpu-linux packages.
Onnxruntime-Gpu has dependency on them.
3. update the package validation as well
4. Add 2 stages to run E2E test for GPU.Windows and GPU.Linux
for example:
### Motivation and Context
Single Onnxruntime.Gpu Package size has already excceded the Nuget size
limit.
We split the package into some smaller packages to make them can be
published.
For compatibility, the user can install or upgrade Onnxruntime.Gpu,
which will install Gpu.Windows and Gpu.Linux automatically.
And the user can only install Gpu.Windows and Gpu.Linux directly.
### Test Link
1. In ORT_NIGHTLY
2. Install the preview version in nuget-int. (nuget source:
https://apiint.nugettest.org/v3/index.json)
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
### Description
Change Nuget packaging pipeline's build TRT job to download CUDA SDK
on-the-fly, so that we do not need to put a CUDA SDK in the build
machine's image.
### Description
ONNX model zoo changed their dir structure. So some our pipelines are
failing. In prevent such things happening again, we'd better to read the
test data for a cache from local disk instead of downloading it remotely
every time.
### Description
Move NuGet nightly package publishing job to a separated pipeline.
Before this change, it runs at the end of 'Zip-Nuget-Java-Nodejs
Packaging Pipeline'. This PR moves it to a separate pipeline so that we
can manually trigger this step for any branch(e.g. release branches).
### Description
To make the code more consistent. Now some TRT pipelines download TRT
binaries on-the-fly, while other TRT pipelines use a preinstalled
version. This PR make them the same.
### Description
1. Add a new stage to download java tools from https://oss.sonatype.org
and publish them to pipeline artifact
2. Remove downloads in other jobs, they get the java tools from pipeline
artifact
3. consolidate final_java_testing stages.
### Motivation and Context
Reduce downloads to reduce the connection error like below.
```
--2023-11-28 07:16:31-- https://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/repositories/releases/content/org/junit/platform/junit-platform-console-standalone/1.6.2/junit-platform-console-standalone-1.6.2.jar
Resolving oss.sonatype.org (oss.sonatype.org)... 3.227.40.198, 3.229.50.23
Connecting to oss.sonatype.org (oss.sonatype.org)|3.227.40.198|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 502 Bad Gateway
2023-11-28 07:16:32 ERROR 502: Bad Gateway.
```
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
Set DML package name correctly so the build doesn't try and include mobile targets.
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
Fix packaging pipeline.
### Description
Only one of "--cuda_version" and "--cuda_home" is needed. If they were
both specified, the first one will take precedence. Since we download
cuda SDKs on-the-fly now, the machines will not need to have a
preinstalled CUDA SDK therefore will not have VS-CUDA integration
extension. Therefore the "--cuda_version" flag will not work. This PR
deletes such usages.
Related PR: #15915
### Description
Add the pool definition in 2 stages even the pool is Microsoft-Hosted
Pool.
### Motivation and Context
Recently, in Nuget pipeline, when we click the Stages to Run
It always pops up
```
Encountered error(s) while parsing pipeline YAML:
Could not find a pool with ID 5206. The pool does not exist or has not been authorized for use. For authorization details, refer to https://aka.ms/yamlauthz.
Could not find a pool with ID 5206. The pool does not exist or has not been authorized for use. For authorization details, refer to https://aka.ms/yamlauthz.
```
### Description
Update the C# nuget build infrastructure to make building a test nuget
package more user friendly and to simplify
- Remove usage of dotnet and msbuild in CIs
- was temporary requirement until .net 6 MAUI was added to the released
Visual Studio
- remove SelectedTargets property and its usage
- Add property for excluding mobile targets
- generally we exclude based on the nuget package name
- can now specify `/p:IncludeMobileTargets=false` on the command line to
force exclusion
- support building test package using build.py `--build_nuget` better
- limit inclusion of xamarin targets as building with them requires a
lot more infrastructure
- use msbuild directly if xamarin targets are included. use dotnet
otherwise.
- remove quoting of property values as it doesn't appear to be necessary
and breaks when msbuild is being used
- add infrastructure to be able to pack the nuget package on linux with
`dotnet pack`
- `nuget pack` is not user friendly as-per comments in changes
- requires stub csproj to provide the nuspec path
- Remove netstandard1.0 targets from nuspec
- we removed support from the actual bindings previously
- Remove usage of nuget-staging directory when creating nuget package on
linux
- the nuspec file element has a fully qualified path for a source file
so there is no obvious benefit to copying to a staging directory prior
to packing
### Motivation and Context
Address issues with 1P users trying to create test nuget packages
locally.
Long overdue cleanup of CI complexity.
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
### Description
1. Update docker files and their build instructions.
ARM64 and x86_64 can use the same docker file.
2. Upgrade Linux CUDA pipeline's base docker image from CentOS7 to UBI8
AB#18990
### Description
### Motivation and Context
It's also used to upgrade visual studio to VS2022.
onnxruntime-gpu-winbuild-T4 and onnxruntime-gpu-tensorrt8-winbuild-t4
are using the image based on one dev branch and VS2019
To avoid breaking the current CIs, we move jobs running on
onnxruntime-gpu-winbuild-T4/onnxruntime-gpu-tensorrt8-winbuild-t4 to
onnxruntime-Win2022-GPU-T4.
1. Enable xnnpack test
2. Change TSA database name from onnxruntime_master to onnxruntime_main.
This is a leftover of renaming the "master" branch to "main"
3. Add two static analysis jobs for WinML and DML
4. Rename the machine pool "aiinfra-dml-winbuild" to
"onnxruntime-Win2019-GPU-dml-A10", so that the internal and public ADO
instances use the same machine pool name.
5. Move Windows GPU CI build pipeline from "onnxruntime-Win2022-GPU-T4"
to "onnxruntime-Win2022-GPU-A10" machine pool, because we do not have
enough T4 GPUs.
### Description
1. Avoid taking dependency on dl.fedoraproject.org
The website is not very stable. Our build pipelines often fail to fetch
packages from there.
2. Update manylinux to the latest version
Here's the motivating issue:
https://github.com/microsoft/azure-pipelines-tasks/issues/10331
Noticed some problems in other repos so also updating usages in ORT.
We may be fine now without it, but this change adds some safeguard against future additions of 'set -x' for debugging.
### Description
Change CUDA pipelines to download CUDA SDK in every build job
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
### Description
After this PR there are following pool need to be updated.
old|new|note
---|---|---
onnxruntime-Win2019-GPU-dml-A10|tbd|
onnxruntime-Win2019-GPU-T4|onnxruntime-Win2022-GPU-T4|
onnxruntime-Win2019-GPU-training-T4|onnxruntime-Win2022-GPU-T4|ame as
the above because we do not have many T4 GPUs
onnxruntime-tensorrt8-winbuild-T4|tbd|
aiinfra-dml-winbuild|tbd|
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
Old pool | New pool | Notes
-- | -- | --
onnxruntime-Win-CPU-2019 | onnxruntime-Win-CPU-2022 |
onnxruntime-Win2019-CPU-training | onnxruntime-Win2022-CPU-training-AMD
|
onnxruntime-Win2019-CPU-training-AMD |
onnxruntime-Win2022-CPU-training-AMD | Same as the above
onnxruntime-Win2019-GPU-dml-A10 | Need be created | You need to create a
new image for it first
onnxruntime-Win2019-GPU-T4 | onnxruntime-Win2022-GPU-T4 |
onnxruntime-Win2019-GPU-training-T4 | onnxruntime-Win2022-GPU-T4 | Same
as the above because we do not have many T4 GPUs
onnxruntime-tensorrt8-winbuild-T4| TBD|TBD
Win-CPU-2021|onnxruntime-Win-CPU-2022| will do it in next PR
Win-CPU-2019|onnxruntime-Win2022-Intel-CPU'| Intel CPU needed for
win-ci-pipeline.yml -> `stage: x64_release_dnnl`
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
### Motivation and Context
With vs2022 we can take the advantage of 64bit compiler. It also with
better c++20 support
Set default value for parameters in nuget-zip pipeline, and only apply
the configurations when they are not "NONE".
---------
Co-authored-by: Randy Shuai <rashuai@microsoft.com>
### Description
Fix the bug in #15693
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
### Description
This PR creates Nuget and Android for Training.
### Motivation and Context
These packages are intended to be released in ORT 1.15 to enable
On-Device Training Scenarios.
## Packaging Story for Learning On The Edge Release
### Nuget Packages:
1. New Native package -> **Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Training** (Native
package will contain binaries for: win-x86, win-x64, win-arm, win-arm64,
linux-x64, linux-arm64, android)
2. C# bindings will be added to existing package ->
**Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Managed**
### Android Package published to Maven:
1. New package for training (full build) ->
**onnxruntime-training-android-full-aar**
### Python Package published to PyPi:
1. Python bindings and offline tooling will be added to the existing ort
training package -> **onnxruntime-training**
### Description
Add parameters to make some stages could use other run's intermediate
output.
### Motivation and Context
nuget workflow has 38 stages of 4 layers.
We had to run the whole workflow from begining to test one stage.
It could make life easier to run only one stage for testing.
like
### N.B.
In this PR, Nuget_Test_Linux_CPU, Nuget_Test_LinuxGPU and
Jar_Packaging_GPU are enabled as the first step.
So I can start to move tests from Linux host to container
### Description
Update cuda 11.6 to 11.8 for Windows pipelines
This PR is just for Windows CUDA pipelines. It does include any change
for Linux pipelines or TensorRT pipelines
### Motivation and Context
It is a planned feature for the upcoming ONNX Runtime release.
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
* Integrate TRT 8.6EA on relevant Linux/Windows/pkg pipelines
* Update onnx-tensorrt to 8.6
* Add new dockerfiles for TRT 8.6 and clean old ones
* Update
[CGManifest](https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/tree/main/cgmanifests)
files and ort build deps version
* yml/script update
* Enable built-in TRT parser option on TRT related pipelines by default
* Exclude test TopKOperator.Top3ExplicitAxisInfinity out of TRT EP tests
(8.6-EA has issue with topk operator)
### Description
1. Remove Linux jobs for ORT-Extension combined build
2. Add a macOS build job for ORT-Extension combined build
3. Adjust the yaml file so that it can support two different ADO
instances.
### Motivation and Context
To test our code better. And it will enable us to run such tests for
every commit in the main branch. It would be easier for us to figure out
which change caused a build break.
See
[AB#13435](https://aiinfra.visualstudio.com/6a833879-cd9b-44a4-a9de-adc2d818f13c/_workitems/edit/13435)
