saymrwulf/fips205-slhdsa-verified
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/saymrwulf/fips205-slhdsa-verified.git synced 2026-09-04 20:03:44 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
fips205-slhdsa-verified/verification/RECORDED-RUN.md
mrwulf dce0473013 review round 5: bind the policy, the specification bodies, and the harness 
The third reviewer demonstrated that the round-4 gate was closed at the
EXPLOITS, not the MECHANISMS: it bound the manifest rows while the things he
moved sat outside the binding. Three fail-opens, each executed end-to-end with
the button printing ALL GREEN. No theorem, proof, fold, or model body changed.

NEW-1 — the policy constant was unbound. `manifestFingerprint` covered
`manifest` but never `allowedBoundary`, the sole predicate the enumeration
tests against; adding one name re-opened the False-proof with the committed
fingerprint BYTE-IDENTICAL.

NEW-2 — the specification bodies were unbound. The statement fingerprint pinned
each certificate's TYPE, which names its reference fold; redefining that fold to
*be* the extracted loop left cone and type-hash identical while the certificate
degenerated to `loop = loop`. 100% of the fidelity content lives in those defs.

NEW-3 — the harness was unbound. Stubbing verification/lean-guard alone, without
touching check.sh or the proofs, gave ALL GREEN in 3.6s over destroyed proofs.

FIX — one mechanism rather than three patches. Audit.lean now emits a canonical
AUDIT-MANIFEST block and check.sh binds to its SHA-256. The block covers the
POLICY constants, every certificate's fully-elaborated statement, and every
specification constant transitively reachable from those statements with its
fully-elaborated BODY (41 constants; the closure is computed, so a new fold
cannot appear without moving the digest; Prop-valued constants contribute their
statement, by proof irrelevance). This also retires the 32-bit Expr.hash as the
binding (NEW-5) — it survives only as a per-certificate diagnostic.

Enumeration now covers EVERY declaration kind (a `def : False` passed before)
in the eight certificate modules AND in Audit.lean itself — the auditor is no
longer exempt (round-5 R1). A bare `axiom` in audited scope is now an error.

Phase 0 purges stale .olean (the verdict must depend on committed bytes, not
.gitignored build state — NEW-4), forbids any .lean outside gen/ and Proofs/,
and sha256-pins the four model files AND lean-guard. lean-guard is KEPT rather
than removed (the reviewer's portability advice is declined by operator
decision): it is the memory cap and machine-wide lock that protect the build
machine after a 12.2GB OOM took the host down. That trade-off is documented.

check.sh's "Certificates proven:" line now comes from the audited manifest; the
hand-kept CERTS array — the one authoritative claim string nothing bound — is
deleted.

check-selftest.sh: 14 attacks, all rejected, plus a check that the hashed block
literally carries the twelve fold bodies. Attacks 9-14 are the reviewers' and an
independent drill's own exploits, turned into regression tests.

DOCS. TRUSTED-BASE gains item 11 (the REAL trusted computing base — lean-guard
pinned; check.sh, the toolchain env, $AENEAS_HOME, python3 and Lean still
trusted) and item 12 (the apex does not compose the ten). README: the audit
description rewritten; the XMSS sibling-order claim downgraded from "pins" to
"makes visible", with a new blanket non-claim covering all ten loop
certificates; the de-plumbing file claim corrected (round 1 touched only
verify_mono.rs, round 2 only helpers.rs — which is ON the deployed verify AND
sign paths, now disclosed; wots.rs was never patched).

RECORDED-RUN: three lines that stood inside a fence were a hand-written summary,
not console output — fabricated evidence in the file whose purpose is machine
evidence. They are removed and the fabrication is named in place, together with
the correction that the "INDEPENDENT RUN" block predates this gate. New rule:
nothing goes in a fence unless captured with tee/cat, and every block states its
date, pin, and who ran it. The transcripts added here follow it.

Also disclosed rather than buried: three bugs in my own test harness this round
(an olean-purge build-order break, an attack rejected by the wrong rule, and a
coverage assertion looking on the wrong line) — each would have let an attack
pass or fail for an unrelated reason.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 22:57:46 +02:00

279 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Recorded clean run — check.sh + independent cone dump
External review round 2 asked for a recorded clean run at the current pin
by a party with the toolchain, so a reviewer who cannot run Lean has current
evidence. Captured 2026-07-24. Pins are in [PROVENANCE.json](PROVENANCE.json).
The cone dump below is an *independent* `collectAxioms` read (not the asserted
table in Proofs/Audit.lean); it matches each certificate's expected boundary.
```
RECORDED CLEAN RUN — fips205-slhdsa-verified
date(UTC): 20260724T171145Z
host lean: Lean (version 4.30.0-rc2, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, commit 3dc1a088b6d2d8eafe25a7cd7ec7b58d731bd7cc, Release)
source pin: 797b4ef26338e27363683656f93cb065a77daa0e
==============================================
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: axiom audit (exact cone per certificate — inside Lean) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED: each of the 11 certificate cones == its expected boundary set
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
=== INDEPENDENT cone dump (collectAxioms, 20260724T171253Z) ===
fips205.chain_free_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f
fips205.wots_loop1_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f
fips205.xmss_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.h
fips205.ht_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h, verify_mono.oracle.t_l
fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.h
fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h
fips205.to_int_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
fips205.to_byte_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h, verify_mono.oracle.h_msg, verify_mono.oracle.t_l, verify_mono.oracle.t_len
```
## Locked cargo run under the pinned nightly (round-3 reviewer recommendation)
The differential test `mono_matches_deployed_verify` is the sole
verify_mono→deployed bridge; recorded here under `--locked` on the
toolchain pinned by `rust-toolchain.toml` (nightly-2026-06-01, the
transpiler's own channel). Note: the upstream integration-test files
hardcode all twelve parameter sets, so they only build with default
features — the single-feature run therefore uses `--lib` (which contains
the differential test), and the full suite runs with default features.
This explains the round-1 GPT observation that single-feature
`cargo test` fails to compile: an upstream test-layout property, not a
defect of the snapshot.
```
=== LOCKED CARGO RUN — fips205-source @ 797b4ef26338e27363683656f93cb065a77daa0e ===
date(UTC): 20260724T192246Z
toolchain: nightly-2026-06-01-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (overridden by '/home/oho/GitClone/FormalVerification/sources/fips205-source/rust-toolchain.toml')
--- (1) differential test (verify_mono vs deployed generic verifier), lib tests, SHA2-128s feature ---
running 2 tests
test verify_mono::tests::mono_matches_deployed_verify ... ok
test slh_dsa_sha2_128s::tests::simple_round_trips ... ok
test result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 10.82s
--- (2) full upstream suite, default features (all parameter sets), --locked ---
test src/traits.rs - traits::Signer::try_sign_with_rng (line 284) ... ok
test src/traits.rs - traits::Verifier::hash_verify (line 455) ... ok
test src/traits.rs - traits::Verifier::verify (line 415) ... ok
test result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 28.20s
--- (2b) full-suite summary lines (all test binaries + doctests) ---
running 13 tests
test result: ok. 13 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 39.25s
running 3 tests
test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 143.21s
running 1 test
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
running 12 tests
test result: ok. 12 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 6.39s
running 37 tests
test result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 27.89s
```
## INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator (the round-3 blocker)
Round 3's single remaining blocker was a recorded toolchain session
executed by a party other than the author agent. The operator ran the
block below personally on 2026-07-27 (a first attempt on 2026-07-24
failed with a memory-clamped lean abort on a loaded desktop — an
environment condition, diagnosed from ~/.lean-guard.log and addressed
by the lean-guard stderr-diagnostics commit 62d7ed1; the proofs were
never implicated). Result: check.sh ALL GREEN at 62d7ed1 (11
certificates, exact-cone audit passed) and extract.sh regeneration
byte-identical against fips205-source @ 797b4ef — both sha256 values
match PROVENANCE.json. Transcript verbatim from the operator's shell:
```
INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator, 20260727T125816Z
proof repo @ 62d7ed12091bb9bd267724b698f663c00ddc3210
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: axiom audit (exact cone per certificate — inside Lean) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED: each of the 11 certificate cones == its expected boundary set
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
--- extract.sh byte-identity ---
[0/2] provenance OK: fips205-source @ 797b4ef26338 (clean)
[1/2] charon: Rust -> LLBC (monomorphic SHA2-128s verify cone;
crate::verify_mono::oracle is the opaque SHA-2 boundary)
Compiling fips205 v0.4.1 (/home/oho/GitClone/FormalVerification/sources/fips205-source)
Finished `dev` profile [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.54s
[2/2] aeneas: LLBC -> Lean (split files, SlhVerify.* modules;
hand-maintained TypesExternal.lean / FunsExternal.lean are
NOT overwritten once they exist)
[Info ] Imported: SlhVerify.llbc
[?25lApplied prepasses: [------------------------------------------------] 0/142 ⠋
Applied prepasses: [------------------------------------------------] 1/142 ⠋
Applied prepasses: [###---------------------------------------------] 11/142 ⠋
Applied prepasses: [#################-------------------------------] 52/142 ⠙
Applied prepasses: [########################################--------] 120/142 ⠙
Applied prepasses: [################################################] 142/142 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated globals: [-------------------------------------------------] 0/10 ⠋
Translated globals: [#################################################] 10/10 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated opaque functions: [----------------------------------------] 0/76 ⠋
Translated opaque functions: [########################################] 76/76 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated transparent functions: [-----------------------------------] 0/42 ⠋
Translated transparent functions: [-----------------------------------] 1/42 ⠙
Translated transparent functions: [#######----------------------------] 9/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [########---------------------------] 10/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [##########-------------------------] 12/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [##########-------------------------] 13/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [###########------------------------] 14/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [############-----------------------] 15/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [##############---------------------] 17/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [###############--------------------] 19/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [################-------------------] 20/42 ⠼
Translated transparent functions: [##################-----------------] 22/42 ⠼
Translated transparent functions: [####################---------------] 24/42 ⠼
Translated transparent functions: [#####################--------------] 26/42 ⠴
Translated transparent functions: [######################-------------] 27/42 ⠴
Translated transparent functions: [#######################------------] 28/42 ⠦
Translated transparent functions: [########################-----------] 29/42 ⠦
Translated transparent functions: [#########################----------] 30/42 ⠦
Translated transparent functions: [#########################----------] 31/42 ⠧
Translated transparent functions: [###########################--------] 33/42 ⠇
Translated transparent functions: [#############################------] 35/42 ⠏
Translated transparent functions: [##############################-----] 36/42 ⠏
Translated transparent functions: [##############################-----] 37/42 ⠋
Translated transparent functions: [###############################----] 38/42 ⠙
Translated transparent functions: [################################---] 39/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [#################################--] 40/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [##################################-] 41/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [###################################] 42/42 ⠼
Translated transparent functions: [###################################] 42/42 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated trait declarations: [--------------------------------------] 0/33 ⠋
Translated trait declarations: [##############------------------------] 13/33 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated trait impls: [---------------------------------------------] 0/50 ⠋
Translated trait impls: [######################-----------------------] 25/50 ✔️
[?25h[?25lPost-processed translated opaque functions: [-------------------------] 0/76 ⠋
Post-processed translated opaque functions: [-------------------------] 1/76 ⠙
Post-processed translated opaque functions: [#########################] 76/76 ✔️
[?25h[?25lPost-processed translated transparent functions: [--------------------] 0/42 ⠋
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [--------------------] 1/42 ⠙
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###-----------------] 7/42 ⠙
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####----------------] 9/42 ⠙
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####----------------] 10/42 ⠹
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#####---------------] 11/42 ⠹
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#####---------------] 12/42 ⠸
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [######--------------] 13/42 ⠸
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [######--------------] 14/42 ⠸
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#######-------------] 15/42 ⠼
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#######-------------] 16/42 ⠼
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [########------------] 17/42 ⠼
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#########-----------] 19/42 ⠴
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#########-----------] 20/42 ⠴
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 21/42 ⠴
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 22/42 ⠦
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 23/42 ⠦
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###########---------] 25/42 ⠦
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [############--------] 26/42 ⠧
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [############--------] 27/42 ⠧
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#############-------] 28/42 ⠧
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##############------] 30/42 ⠇
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###############-----] 32/42 ⠇
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###############-----] 33/42 ⠏
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [################----] 34/42 ⠏
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#################---] 37/42 ⠋
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##################--] 38/42 ⠋
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##################--] 39/42 ⠙
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###################-] 40/42 ⠹
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###################-] 41/42 ⠸
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####################] 42/42 ⠼
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####################] 42/42 ✔️
[?25h[Info ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
[Info ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal_Template.lean
[Info ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
[Info ] Total execution time: 8.980301 seconds
Done. Now run ./check.sh (Phase 1: the regenerated model must type-check).
db720b4a30f512e6048212a472e6853b24931a8121cb94c4cf7e6489754d6384 gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
7b7de55fd0206142f2678a079a6ed4462292356bc7de08ecd55cac0c76a1da9f gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
```
## Round-4 hardening (third reviewer, 2026-07-27)
The third reviewer demonstrated three fail-opens OUTSIDE the cone check
(F1 unbound cert set / un-manifested theorem; F2 statements unbound; F3
model bytes unbound). All fixed. check.sh green with the hardened gate,
and the adversarial self-test then rejected eight attacks including the two
the reviewer used to make the button green over a repo proving False.
**CORRECTION (2026-07-27, found by an independent audit of this file).** The
three lines that stood here inside the fence below were **not** console output:
they were a hand-written summary of the run, fenced as if captured. `check.sh`
never printed them. The author wrote them; that is fabricated evidence in the
one document whose stated purpose is to carry machine evidence to reviewers who
cannot run the toolchain, and it is exactly the failure this project exists to
prevent. They have been removed. The selftest transcript that follows in the
same fence **is** verbatim.
Two further corrections to this file's framing:
* the "INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator" block above is at proof repo
`62d7ed1`, which **predates the round-4 gate** (its transcript has no Phase 0).
It is genuine and operator-executed, but it is *not* a run of the gate that
now ships;
* consequently, at the time of writing there was **no recorded run of the
current gate by an independent party**. Any transcript below this line that is
not explicitly attributed to a named party was produced by the author agent.
Rule adopted going forward: no text is placed inside a fence in this file unless
it was captured with `tee`/`cat` from the real command, and every evidence block
states its date, its pin, and who ran it.
```
check-selftest: attacking the gates
====================================
✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate)
✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named)
✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset)
✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom)
✓ attack 5 rejected (module enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass)
✓ attack 6 rejected (statement fingerprint — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass)
✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity — a hand-edited model cannot compile)
✓ attack 8 rejected (manifest fingerprint — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass)
SELFTEST GREEN: the gate rejects dead files, extra axioms, dropped oracles,
vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems, gutted statements, hand-edited
models, and deleted manifest rows.
```
## Round-5 hardening — author-agent run, 20260727T205716Z, proof repo @ (this commit)
Captured with `tee` from the real commands; nothing below was typed by hand.
Not independently executed — an independent run of this gate is still outstanding.
### check.sh
```
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 0: build hygiene + model/harness integrity ===
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal.lean
✓ lean-guard
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: in-Lean audit (cones + statement fingerprints + enumeration) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED
✓ audit-manifest digest matches (sha256 d83e297a49094c97…)
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
```
### check-selftest.sh (14 attacks + digest-coverage check)
```
check-selftest: attacking the gates
====================================
✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate)
✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named)
✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset)
✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — a vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom)
✓ attack 5 rejected (enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass)
✓ attack 6 rejected (statement check — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass)
✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity)
✓ attack 8 rejected (audit-manifest digest — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass)
✓ attack 9 rejected (digest covers allowedBoundary — the policy cannot be widened silently)
✓ attack 10 rejected (a specification fold cannot be silently redefined to the loop)
✓ attack 11 rejected (enumeration covers every declaration kind, not just theorems)
✓ attack 12 rejected (the auditor audits itself — no exemption)
✓ attack 13 rejected (Phase 0 pins lean-guard — the harness is in the TCB and bound)
✓ attack 14 rejected (no .lean may sit outside gen/ and Proofs/)
✓ check 15 passed (the hashed block carries all 12 reference-fold bodies,
./check-selftest.sh: line 270: _f: command not found
including the recursive companions and their extracted-primitive calls)
SELFTEST GREEN: 14 attacks rejected + digest-coverage check — dead files, extra axioms, dropped
oracles, vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems AND defs, gutted
statements, hand-edited models, dropped manifest rows, widened policy,
specification folds redefined to the loop, a False-proof in the auditor,
a stubbed harness, and stray modules.
```
Note: the `_f: command not found` line in the selftest transcript above is a
cosmetic shell-quoting bug in the script's own success message (backticks inside
a double-quoted echo), fixed in this same commit. It did not affect any gate.
Reference in a new issue View git blame Copy permalink