# Recorded clean run — check.sh + independent cone dump External review round 2 asked for a recorded clean run at the current pin by a party with the toolchain, so a reviewer who cannot run Lean has current evidence. Captured 2026-07-24. Pins are in [PROVENANCE.json](PROVENANCE.json). The cone dump below is an *independent* `collectAxioms` read (not the asserted table in Proofs/Audit.lean); it matches each certificate's expected boundary. ``` RECORDED CLEAN RUN — fips205-slhdsa-verified date(UTC): 20260724T171145Z host lean: Lean (version 4.30.0-rc2, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, commit 3dc1a088b6d2d8eafe25a7cd7ec7b58d731bd7cc, Release) source pin: 797b4ef26338e27363683656f93cb065a77daa0e ============================================== fips205-slhdsa-verified — check =============================== === Phase 1: compile the extracted model === · gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal · gen/SlhVerify/Types · gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal · gen/SlhVerify/Funs === Phase 2: compile the proofs === · ChainSpec · WotsSpec · XmssSpec · HtSpec · ForsInnerSpec · ForsOuterSpec · InputPrepSpec · ApexSpec === Phase 3: axiom audit (exact cone per certificate — inside Lean) === ✓ exact-cone audit PASSED: each of the 11 certificate cones == its expected boundary set ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles. Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff === INDEPENDENT cone dump (collectAxioms, 20260724T171253Z) === fips205.chain_free_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f fips205.wots_loop1_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f fips205.xmss_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.h fips205.ht_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h, verify_mono.oracle.t_l fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.h fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h fips205.to_int_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound fips205.to_byte_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h, verify_mono.oracle.h_msg, verify_mono.oracle.t_l, verify_mono.oracle.t_len ``` ## Locked cargo run under the pinned nightly (round-3 reviewer recommendation) The differential test `mono_matches_deployed_verify` is the sole verify_mono→deployed bridge; recorded here under `--locked` on the toolchain pinned by `rust-toolchain.toml` (nightly-2026-06-01, the transpiler's own channel). Note: the upstream integration-test files hardcode all twelve parameter sets, so they only build with default features — the single-feature run therefore uses `--lib` (which contains the differential test), and the full suite runs with default features. This explains the round-1 GPT observation that single-feature `cargo test` fails to compile: an upstream test-layout property, not a defect of the snapshot. ``` === LOCKED CARGO RUN — fips205-source @ 797b4ef26338e27363683656f93cb065a77daa0e === date(UTC): 20260724T192246Z toolchain: nightly-2026-06-01-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (overridden by '/home/oho/GitClone/FormalVerification/sources/fips205-source/rust-toolchain.toml') --- (1) differential test (verify_mono vs deployed generic verifier), lib tests, SHA2-128s feature --- running 2 tests test verify_mono::tests::mono_matches_deployed_verify ... ok test slh_dsa_sha2_128s::tests::simple_round_trips ... ok test result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 10.82s --- (2) full upstream suite, default features (all parameter sets), --locked --- test src/traits.rs - traits::Signer::try_sign_with_rng (line 284) ... ok test src/traits.rs - traits::Verifier::hash_verify (line 455) ... ok test src/traits.rs - traits::Verifier::verify (line 415) ... ok test result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 28.20s --- (2b) full-suite summary lines (all test binaries + doctests) --- running 13 tests test result: ok. 13 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 39.25s running 3 tests test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 143.21s running 1 test test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s running 12 tests test result: ok. 12 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 6.39s running 37 tests test result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 27.89s ``` ## INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator (the round-3 blocker) Round 3's single remaining blocker was a recorded toolchain session executed by a party other than the author agent. The operator ran the block below personally on 2026-07-27 (a first attempt on 2026-07-24 failed with a memory-clamped lean abort on a loaded desktop — an environment condition, diagnosed from ~/.lean-guard.log and addressed by the lean-guard stderr-diagnostics commit 62d7ed1; the proofs were never implicated). Result: check.sh ALL GREEN at 62d7ed1 (11 certificates, exact-cone audit passed) and extract.sh regeneration byte-identical against fips205-source @ 797b4ef — both sha256 values match PROVENANCE.json. Transcript verbatim from the operator's shell: ``` INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator, 20260727T125816Z proof repo @ 62d7ed12091bb9bd267724b698f663c00ddc3210 fips205-slhdsa-verified — check =============================== === Phase 1: compile the extracted model === · gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal · gen/SlhVerify/Types · gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal · gen/SlhVerify/Funs === Phase 2: compile the proofs === · ChainSpec · WotsSpec · XmssSpec · HtSpec · ForsInnerSpec · ForsOuterSpec · InputPrepSpec · ApexSpec === Phase 3: axiom audit (exact cone per certificate — inside Lean) === ✓ exact-cone audit PASSED: each of the 11 certificate cones == its expected boundary set ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles. Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff --- extract.sh byte-identity --- [0/2] provenance OK: fips205-source @ 797b4ef26338 (clean) [1/2] charon: Rust -> LLBC (monomorphic SHA2-128s verify cone; crate::verify_mono::oracle is the opaque SHA-2 boundary) Compiling fips205 v0.4.1 (/home/oho/GitClone/FormalVerification/sources/fips205-source) Finished `dev` profile [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.54s [2/2] aeneas: LLBC -> Lean (split files, SlhVerify.* modules; hand-maintained TypesExternal.lean / FunsExternal.lean are NOT overwritten once they exist) [Info ] Imported: SlhVerify.llbc [?25lApplied prepasses: [------------------------------------------------] 0/142 ⠋ Applied prepasses: [------------------------------------------------] 1/142 ⠋ Applied prepasses: [###---------------------------------------------] 11/142 ⠋ Applied prepasses: [#################-------------------------------] 52/142 ⠙ Applied prepasses: [########################################--------] 120/142 ⠙ Applied prepasses: [################################################] 142/142 ✔️ [?25h[?25lTranslated globals: [-------------------------------------------------] 0/10 ⠋ Translated globals: [#################################################] 10/10 ✔️ [?25h[?25lTranslated opaque functions: [----------------------------------------] 0/76 ⠋ Translated opaque functions: [########################################] 76/76 ✔️ [?25h[?25lTranslated transparent functions: [-----------------------------------] 0/42 ⠋ Translated transparent functions: [-----------------------------------] 1/42 ⠙ Translated transparent functions: [#######----------------------------] 9/42 ⠹ Translated transparent functions: [########---------------------------] 10/42 ⠹ Translated transparent functions: [##########-------------------------] 12/42 ⠹ Translated transparent functions: [##########-------------------------] 13/42 ⠹ Translated transparent functions: [###########------------------------] 14/42 ⠸ Translated transparent functions: [############-----------------------] 15/42 ⠸ Translated transparent functions: [##############---------------------] 17/42 ⠸ Translated transparent functions: [###############--------------------] 19/42 ⠸ Translated transparent functions: [################-------------------] 20/42 ⠼ Translated transparent functions: [##################-----------------] 22/42 ⠼ Translated transparent functions: [####################---------------] 24/42 ⠼ Translated transparent functions: [#####################--------------] 26/42 ⠴ Translated transparent functions: [######################-------------] 27/42 ⠴ Translated transparent functions: [#######################------------] 28/42 ⠦ Translated transparent functions: [########################-----------] 29/42 ⠦ Translated transparent functions: [#########################----------] 30/42 ⠦ Translated transparent functions: [#########################----------] 31/42 ⠧ Translated transparent functions: [###########################--------] 33/42 ⠇ Translated transparent functions: [#############################------] 35/42 ⠏ Translated transparent functions: [##############################-----] 36/42 ⠏ Translated transparent functions: [##############################-----] 37/42 ⠋ Translated transparent functions: [###############################----] 38/42 ⠙ Translated transparent functions: [################################---] 39/42 ⠹ Translated transparent functions: [#################################--] 40/42 ⠸ Translated transparent functions: [##################################-] 41/42 ⠸ Translated transparent functions: [###################################] 42/42 ⠼ Translated transparent functions: [###################################] 42/42 ✔️ [?25h[?25lTranslated trait declarations: [--------------------------------------] 0/33 ⠋ Translated trait declarations: [##############------------------------] 13/33 ✔️ [?25h[?25lTranslated trait impls: [---------------------------------------------] 0/50 ⠋ Translated trait impls: [######################-----------------------] 25/50 ✔️ [?25h[?25lPost-processed translated opaque functions: [-------------------------] 0/76 ⠋ Post-processed translated opaque functions: [-------------------------] 1/76 ⠙ Post-processed translated opaque functions: [#########################] 76/76 ✔️ [?25h[?25lPost-processed translated transparent functions: [--------------------] 0/42 ⠋ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [--------------------] 1/42 ⠙ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###-----------------] 7/42 ⠙ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####----------------] 9/42 ⠙ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####----------------] 10/42 ⠹ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#####---------------] 11/42 ⠹ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#####---------------] 12/42 ⠸ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [######--------------] 13/42 ⠸ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [######--------------] 14/42 ⠸ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#######-------------] 15/42 ⠼ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#######-------------] 16/42 ⠼ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [########------------] 17/42 ⠼ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#########-----------] 19/42 ⠴ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#########-----------] 20/42 ⠴ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 21/42 ⠴ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 22/42 ⠦ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 23/42 ⠦ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###########---------] 25/42 ⠦ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [############--------] 26/42 ⠧ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [############--------] 27/42 ⠧ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#############-------] 28/42 ⠧ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##############------] 30/42 ⠇ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###############-----] 32/42 ⠇ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###############-----] 33/42 ⠏ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [################----] 34/42 ⠏ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#################---] 37/42 ⠋ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##################--] 38/42 ⠋ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##################--] 39/42 ⠙ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###################-] 40/42 ⠹ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###################-] 41/42 ⠸ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####################] 42/42 ⠼ Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####################] 42/42 ✔️ [?25h[Info ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean [Info ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal_Template.lean [Info ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean [Info ] Total execution time: 8.980301 seconds Done. Now run ./check.sh (Phase 1: the regenerated model must type-check). db720b4a30f512e6048212a472e6853b24931a8121cb94c4cf7e6489754d6384 gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean 7b7de55fd0206142f2678a079a6ed4462292356bc7de08ecd55cac0c76a1da9f gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean ``` ## Round-4 hardening (third reviewer, 2026-07-27) The third reviewer demonstrated three fail-opens OUTSIDE the cone check (F1 unbound cert set / un-manifested theorem; F2 statements unbound; F3 model bytes unbound). All fixed. check.sh green with the hardened gate, and the adversarial self-test then rejected eight attacks including the two the reviewer used to make the button green over a repo proving False. **CORRECTION (2026-07-27, found by an independent audit of this file).** The three lines that stood here inside the fence below were **not** console output: they were a hand-written summary of the run, fenced as if captured. `check.sh` never printed them. The author wrote them; that is fabricated evidence in the one document whose stated purpose is to carry machine evidence to reviewers who cannot run the toolchain, and it is exactly the failure this project exists to prevent. They have been removed. The selftest transcript that follows in the same fence **is** verbatim. Two further corrections to this file's framing: * the "INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator" block above is at proof repo `62d7ed1`, which **predates the round-4 gate** (its transcript has no Phase 0). It is genuine and operator-executed, but it is *not* a run of the gate that now ships; * consequently, at the time of writing there was **no recorded run of the current gate by an independent party**. Any transcript below this line that is not explicitly attributed to a named party was produced by the author agent. Rule adopted going forward: no text is placed inside a fence in this file unless it was captured with `tee`/`cat` from the real command, and every evidence block states its date, its pin, and who ran it. ``` check-selftest: attacking the gates ==================================== ✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate) ✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named) ✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset) ✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom) ✓ attack 5 rejected (module enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass) ✓ attack 6 rejected (statement fingerprint — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass) ✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity — a hand-edited model cannot compile) ✓ attack 8 rejected (manifest fingerprint — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass) SELFTEST GREEN: the gate rejects dead files, extra axioms, dropped oracles, vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems, gutted statements, hand-edited models, and deleted manifest rows. ``` ## Round-5 hardening — author-agent run, 20260727T205716Z, proof repo @ (this commit) Captured with `tee` from the real commands; nothing below was typed by hand. Not independently executed — an independent run of this gate is still outstanding. ### check.sh ``` fips205-slhdsa-verified — check =============================== === Phase 0: build hygiene + model/harness integrity === ✓ gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean ✓ gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal.lean ✓ gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean ✓ gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal.lean ✓ lean-guard === Phase 1: compile the extracted model === · gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal · gen/SlhVerify/Types · gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal · gen/SlhVerify/Funs === Phase 2: compile the proofs === · ChainSpec · WotsSpec · XmssSpec · HtSpec · ForsInnerSpec · ForsOuterSpec · InputPrepSpec · ApexSpec === Phase 3: in-Lean audit (cones + statement fingerprints + enumeration) === ✓ exact-cone audit PASSED ✓ audit-manifest digest matches (sha256 d83e297a49094c97…) ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles. Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff ``` ### check-selftest.sh (14 attacks + digest-coverage check) ``` check-selftest: attacking the gates ==================================== ✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate) ✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named) ✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset) ✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — a vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom) ✓ attack 5 rejected (enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass) ✓ attack 6 rejected (statement check — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass) ✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity) ✓ attack 8 rejected (audit-manifest digest — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass) ✓ attack 9 rejected (digest covers allowedBoundary — the policy cannot be widened silently) ✓ attack 10 rejected (a specification fold cannot be silently redefined to the loop) ✓ attack 11 rejected (enumeration covers every declaration kind, not just theorems) ✓ attack 12 rejected (the auditor audits itself — no exemption) ✓ attack 13 rejected (Phase 0 pins lean-guard — the harness is in the TCB and bound) ✓ attack 14 rejected (no .lean may sit outside gen/ and Proofs/) ✓ check 15 passed (the hashed block carries all 12 reference-fold bodies, ./check-selftest.sh: line 270: _f: command not found including the recursive companions and their extracted-primitive calls) SELFTEST GREEN: 14 attacks rejected + digest-coverage check — dead files, extra axioms, dropped oracles, vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems AND defs, gutted statements, hand-edited models, dropped manifest rows, widened policy, specification folds redefined to the loop, a False-proof in the auditor, a stubbed harness, and stray modules. ``` Note: the `_f: command not found` line in the selftest transcript above is a cosmetic shell-quoting bug in the script's own success message (backticks inside a double-quoted echo), fixed in this same commit. It did not affect any gate.