mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/proof-aware-crypto-tooling-agent.git
synced 2026-09-04 20:03:40 +00:00
mrwulf
ea80c99244
Consolidates the consumer-side trust framing that was scattered across notebooks 05/06b and WALLET.md into one on-ramp: the allowed-axioms list as a requirements card you own and can write yourself; measurement vs publication vs judgment (operator/log/you); the three honest outcomes when your card is stricter than the supply (relax itemized / walk away / grow the supply). Executable: a self-written card is shown to equal the real APEX_BOUNDARIES cone exactly (supply == wish: True), and a strict no-oracle card is REFUSED with the real SHA-512/wire gap itemized. Registered in course map + notebook test; 101 tests green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
23 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
23 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# PACTA Curriculum Notebooks
|
|
|
|
This directory contains a zero-to-hero teaching sequence for proof-aware cryptographic tooling.
|
|
|
|
Start with `00_course_map.ipynb`, then proceed in order. The notebooks are intentionally output-free in git. Run them from the repository root or from this directory; each notebook locates the repo root and imports `pacta` from `src/`.
|
|
|
|
The course teaches:
|
|
|
|
- theorem-boundary thinking,
|
|
- claim cards and residual risk,
|
|
- Lean replay and axiom audit concepts,
|
|
- proof hygiene,
|
|
- third-party proof-check provider trust,
|
|
- RFC 9162-style Merkle transparency logs,
|
|
- the mirrored provider/agent domain split (6a: one provider builds and dogfood-signs the log; 6b: many agents verify inclusion in ~25 lines, no Lean),
|
|
- receipt-gated agent consequences (including the R4 wallet gate, now reachable),
|
|
- split-view defense: STH pinning, consistency enforcement, freshness, monitoring,
|
|
- dogfood verified cryptography and the honest hybrid post-quantum posture,
|
|
- the verified-custody wallet (warden): a quorum boundary of four proven forks, the signing firewall, and the agent-native MCP surface,
|
|
- the customer's-eye view: the allowed-axioms list as a requirements card you own and could write yourself, and what happens when your card is stricter than the supply,
|
|
- research roadmaps from R4 evidence toward R5 assurance.
|
|
|
|
This curriculum is not financial advice, not a trading bot, and not a wallet-building guide. It is a training path for engineers and researchers who need to evaluate formal-verification-enhanced cryptographic tooling without overclaiming.
|