mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/proof-aware-crypto-tooling-agent.git
synced 2026-09-03 19:53:43 +00:00
- WALLET.md: the product manual (one idea, trust posture table, R4 gate, quickstart, MCP surface, self-proving card, firewall, taxonomy) - docs/products.md: four production-ready deployment profiles (solo/airgap/treasury/choir) with honest built-vs-wired boundaries - llms.txt: agent-native discovery manifest at repo root - README: warden intro + lecture 10 pointer - notebooks/10_verified_custody_wallet.ipynb: ratchet-rule lecture (toy 3-of-3 -> real four proven forks -> counterparty recomputes a card's inclusion proof); course README + notebook test updated - 83 tests green Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
PACTA Curriculum Notebooks
This directory contains a zero-to-hero teaching sequence for proof-aware cryptographic tooling.
Start with 00_course_map.ipynb, then proceed in order. The notebooks are intentionally output-free in git. Run them from the repository root or from this directory; each notebook locates the repo root and imports pacta from src/.
The course teaches:
- theorem-boundary thinking,
- claim cards and residual risk,
- Lean replay and axiom audit concepts,
- proof hygiene,
- third-party proof-check provider trust,
- RFC 9162-style Merkle transparency logs,
- the mirrored provider/agent domain split (6a: one provider builds and dogfood-signs the log; 6b: many agents verify inclusion in ~25 lines, no Lean),
- receipt-gated agent consequences (including the R4 wallet gate, now reachable),
- split-view defense: STH pinning, consistency enforcement, freshness, monitoring,
- dogfood verified cryptography and the honest hybrid post-quantum posture,
- the verified-custody wallet (warden): a quorum boundary of four proven forks, the signing firewall, and the agent-native MCP surface,
- research roadmaps from R4 evidence toward R5 assurance.
This curriculum is not financial advice, not a trading bot, and not a wallet-building guide. It is a training path for engineers and researchers who need to evaluate formal-verification-enhanced cryptographic tooling without overclaiming.