proof-aware-crypto-tooling-.../WALLET.md
mrwulf 00be6a396e cockpit: UX law — the cockpit never leaves a human in the dark
Operator verdict on the first cockpit: unusable, jargon-walled. The
evidence layer was honest but the presentation assumed the reader
already lived inside warden's head. This rebuilds the presentation
layer around a testable UX contract, additive to the design law:

- every page: verdict IN WORDS first (CUSTODY HEALTHY / CUSTODY FROZEN
  (LATCHED) / CUSTODY EVIDENCE BROKEN), then evidence, then provenance
- every page: plain-language lead saying what the page answers
- every panel: 'How to read this panel' expander interpreting every
  column and pill; jargon carries a ? linking to the glossary
- new /guide view: what warden is, how to read any page, color code,
  five-minute tour, 12-term glossary, honest 'what this cockpit cannot
  tell you'
- navigation: two-line tabs stating the question each view answers,
  present on every page; /estate gets a back-to-cockpit chip
- explained empty states (incidents: 'empty is the good state')
- narrow-viewport fix: tables/pre scroll in their own containers
- estate fact chip updated 130->135 green (both renderings)

UX contract is test-enforced (guide terms, lead+nav+explainers on every
view, empty states); read-only byte-guarantee sweep now covers /guide.
Verified by looking: served --demo, walked all six views in a browser.
Suite 131 -> 135 green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 16:15:00 +02:00

13 KiB
Raw Blame History

warden — the verified-custody wallet

warden is the acting end of pacta. Where the rest of the project decides which cryptographic code is trustworthy, warden runs on that decision: it builds an Ed25519 custody boundary out of the four independently proven curve25519-dalek forks, and puts them to work guarding money- adjacent signatures — inbound and outbound.

It is agent-native first. The primary interface is an MCP server; a human CLI is provided for operation and inspection. The design research behind that choice is in docs/agent-native.md.


The one idea

Inbound acceptance requires a unanimous quorum of provably-equivalent verifiers. Outbound signatures must pass the same quorum before release.

Each quorum member is an Ed25519 verifier compiled from a source workspace whose correctness certificates are machine-checked in Lean 4 and replay- attested in the public Lean Transparency Log. The four members — dalek, anza, risc0, betrusted — are genuinely different codebases, but each is proven to decide the same predicate:

accept(A, m, R, s)  ⇔  decompress(R) = [k](A) + [s]B

Classic N-version programming hopes independent implementations won't share a bug. warden doesn't hope: on the proven domain the members cannot disagree about semantics, so a runtime disagreement is not a difference of opinion — it is evidence of build corruption, a memory fault, or tampering. That turns "the verifiers disagreed" from a shrug into an alarm with a machine-checked guarantee behind it.


Trust posture (read this before trusting it)

surface assurance
inbound verification custody-grade — quorum of certificate-covered verify paths
outbound firewall (verify-after-sign) custody-grade — same quorum
outbound signing itself trusted base — the attested artifact, not a third implementation; not covered by any theorem
SHA-512 opaque oracle inside the theorems
wire parsers outcomes are hypotheses
reproducible builds, side channels not claimed (that is R5)
ML-DSA / PQC fail-closed: no proven implementation exists

The asymmetry is the point: warden is strongest exactly where it matters most for custody — deciding whether an inbound authorization is real — and honest about the weaker outbound edge, which it fences with the firewall.


Anatomy of a wallet

A wallet is a directory of evidence, not a database of secrets:

capsule.json     the sealed custody capsule: quorum members, their attested
                 source commits, the transparency-log receipts that
                 authorized them (the R4 gate), and the policy in force
ledger.jsonl     append-only, SHA-256 hash-chained event log
keys/            wallet identities (local signer keys are 0600; the airgap
                 identity has no private key on this host)
incidents/       quorum divergences and firewall quarantines, full trails
receipts/        refusal receipts — signed, machine-actionable
quarantine/      signatures the firewall refused to release
airgap/          outbox/inbox for the Precursor-style gap signer
latch.json       present and latched=true when custody is frozen

Every state change — inbound verify, outbound sign, refusal, incident, latch, unlatch — is a hash-chained ledger entry. pacta wallet verify-ledger recomputes the chain; a single altered byte anywhere in the history is caught.


The R4 gate, in executable form

pacta wallet init refuses to create a wallet unless, for every member:

  1. the built binary's provenance names an attested source commit;
  2. the evidence dir holds that component's attestation + inclusion receipt;
  3. the attestation re-validates locally — verdicts are re-derived from observed axiom cones, never taken from the provider's label;
  4. the local score reaches the required tier (default R4);
  5. the receipt's inclusion proof verifies against its signed tree head, under the log public key you pass;
  6. the source commit the binary was compiled from matches the attested one.

Miss any of these and wallet creation fails with the reasons listed. A custody wallet that cannot show its evidence has no business existing.

--trusted-provider is required: you must name whose observations you are consuming. You are never asked to trust their verdicts.

You hold the ruler

The allowed-axioms lists the gate checks against are a requirements card that ships in your tooling (the ed25519 profile) — small enough to read over coffee, re-derivable from the attested repos' own docs and check scripts, and replaceable with a card you write yourself from first principles. Verdicts are re-derived against your copy, name by name; the provider's labels are ignored. If your card is stricter than today's supply (e.g. "SHA-512 itself proven"), the gap is itemized and your options are honest: accept a named line item, walk away, or prove the missing piece and enter it into the log — if your ruler is stricter than our supply, your ruler is our roadmap. The full walk-through is lecture 11.


Quickstart

# 0. one-time: build the dogfood signer + the four quorum members
pacta dogfood-build --source <…>/curve25519-dalek-source
pacta wallet build-quorum --sources-root <…>/sources     # dalek anza risc0 betrusted

# 1. fetch fresh evidence for each fork from the live log
for c in dalek anza risc0 betrusted; do
  pacta log-fetch --url https://ltl.zkdefi.org \
    --component ${c}-ed25519-verified --out-dir ./evidence
done

# 2. create the wallet (R4 gate)
pacta wallet init --wallet ./my-warden --evidence ./evidence \
  --log-public-key ./log.pub --trusted-provider local-pacta-provider

# 3. inspect
pacta wallet status --wallet ./my-warden
pacta wallet card   --wallet ./my-warden          # the self-proving custody card

# 4. serve the agent-native surface
pacta wallet mcp --wallet ./my-warden             # stdio JSON-RPC MCP server

The custody cockpit (human surface, read-only)

pacta wallet cockpit --wallet <dir> (or --demo for a throwaway, custody-inert wallet to explore from zero) serves a local web UI for the operator: posture (verdict banner, latch, ledger chain re-verified, pinned quorum), the airgap signature queue (observed, never operated), the incident and refusal browser, a receipt inspector driven by the deployed verifier, the estate map, and a plain-language guide with a full glossary. Design law: it renders recomputed evidence with provenance lines, never cached status; it cannot approve, sign, unlatch, or modify custody state (byte-level read-only guarantee in tests/test_walletui.py). UX law: every page explains itself — verdict in words, per-panel "how to read this" expanders, jargon linked to the /guide glossary (also test-enforced). Details: docs/cockpit.md.

Agent-native surface (MCP)

pacta wallet mcp speaks MCP over stdio JSON-RPC. Eight outcome-first tools with read-only/destructive annotations; strict input schemas; results carry evidence; errors are structured objects that include the signed refusal receipt, never prose. Tool classes are rate-limited (custody 30/min, verify 120/min, liveness 240/min).

tool does
wallet_status custody posture: members/tiers, latch, ledger head + chain integrity, counts
verify_inbound run the quorum on (payload, signature, public_key); unanimity or a classified incident
request_signature intent-bound outbound signing through the firewall; refusal object on any gate
custody_card the self-proving card (embedded inclusion proofs; recompute, don't believe)
posture_challenge nonce → firewalled, signed posture attestation with the quorum trail
list_incidents divergences and quarantines, newest-first
explain_refusal fetch a refusal receipt by index (or latest)
airgap_pending parked gap-signing requests and whether the device answered

Refusal codes (every refusal names one): EVIDENCE_REQUIRED, POLICY_DENIED, CUSTODY_LATCHED, EVIDENCE_STALE, MALFORMED_INTENT, SIGNER_UNAVAILABLE, FIREWALL_QUARANTINE, PENDING_AIRGAP, RATE_LIMITED.

The custody card is self-proving

Unlike an A2A agent card that you take on the operator's signature, the warden card embeds, per member, the transparency-log inclusion proof and signed tree head. A counterparty recomputes the Merkle roots and checks the STH signature against the log key it already pins — trust by recomputation, not by assertion. See verify_posture_attestation and the log's own verify.py for the ~40-line client side.


The spending policy (POLICY_DENIED)

Optional policy.json in the wallet directory - the rules you would give a teenager with a debit card, checked before the signer ever runs:

{
  "outbound": {
    "max_amount_per_request": 100.0,
    "max_amount_per_day": 500.0,
    "counterparty_allowlist": ["alice"],
    "counterparty_denylist": ["mallory"]
  },
  "identities": { "warden": { "max_amount_per_request": 10.0 } },
  "ledger": { "rotate_at": 100000 }
}

Amount rules bind on intent.amount; list rules bind on intent.counterparty - policy makes those fields mandatory, so a request that omits them is refused, never waved past. Daily ceilings sum the released amounts in the ledger's last 24 hours per identity. Per-identity overrides win over outbound defaults. No policy.json means unrestricted (and wallet_status says so). pacta wallet policy --wallet <dir> --init-template writes a starter file.

Surface controls and the ledger's diet

The MCP layer rate-limits by tool class (custody 30/min, verify 120/min, liveness 240/min) so a hostile counterparty cannot grind the signer or bloat the audit trail; rate refusals are surface events, not custody events, and are not ledgered. The ledger itself appends in O(1) (only the tail is read, under a dedicated lock file, fsynced) and rotates into hash-chained archive segments at ledger.rotate_at entries - verify-ledger walks the whole chain across segments back to genesis.

warden-treasury (Solana)

pacta wallet treasury-verify takes a wire-format Solana transaction (from a file, or fetched by signature via --rpc-url), parses it locally (stdlib; legacy and v0), and quorum-verifies every required signature over the exact message bytes - including through the anza member, the certificate-covered verify path of the code Solana validators run. The RPC is demoted from oracle to bandwidth: it can withhold transactions (the verdict names this completeness gap explicitly), but it cannot manufacture one the quorum will accept. Every check lands in the ledger with a treasury context.

The signing firewall (verify-after-sign)

Outbound is: intent → sign → firewall → release.

  1. intent — a structured envelope whose purpose is recorded (the ledger stores why, not only what) and whose payload_sha256 binds the request to exact bytes.
  2. sign — either the local dogfood signer or the airgap/Precursor signer (seed never on this host; request parked in airgap/outbox, response read from airgap/inbox).
  3. firewall — the fresh signature faces the full quorum. This is the textbook fault-injection countermeasure: a glitched or tampered signer is caught before anything leaves the building.
  4. release — only unanimity releases. A rejected self-signature is quarantined, never returned, and custody latches.

A latched wallet refuses all outbound with CUSTODY_LATCHED, and — by design — its refusals arrive unsigned: a wallet that no longer trusts its own boundary does not certify its apologies. pacta wallet unlatch --note "<why>" is a deliberate operator act; the note is recorded permanently in the ledger next to the latch it releases.


Divergence taxonomy

The forks' accept() predicates are allowed to differ only on documented degenerate inputs (anza rejects A = 0 and a legacy excluded-small-order- R list). warden fails closed regardless; the taxonomy only grades the alarm:

classification when verdict incident
unanimous-accept all accept accept
unanimous-reject all reject reject
semantic-edge disagree AND a documented edge flag applies reject note
unexplained disagree with no explanation (or a member errored) reject tamper → latch

Product lineup

warden ships as one core with four production-ready deployment profiles — see docs/products.md. Operational docs: the attacker matrix in docs/threat-model.md and the latch-recovery runbook. In one line each:

  • warden-solo — a single agent's custody sidecar (local signer).
  • warden-airgap — signing behind a Precursor/Betrusted hardware gap.
  • warden-treasury — trust-minimized chain watching (re-verify with the chain's own proven verifier; the RPC is demoted to bandwidth).
  • warden-choir — N wardens cross-witnessing each other's ledgers.