### Description
The CI is extremely slow on downloading source code (~1MB/sec) so the
web CI went timeout. This is blocking the PR/checks.
Increase the timeout temporarily.
### Description
this is for ort 1.15 release to work with onnx 1.14
It shall be merged after onnx 1.14 release and before ort 1.15 release.
### Motivation and Context
---------
Signed-off-by: Liqun Fu <liqfu@microsoft.com>
### Description
- Update DML version to 1.11.0
- Disable Gemm+Softmax fusion
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
**Description**:
This PR intends to enable WebNN EP in ONNX Runtime Web. It translates
the ONNX nodes by [WebNN
API](https://webmachinelearning.github.io/webnn/), which is implemented
in C++ and uses Emscripten [Embind
API](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/connecting_cpp_and_javascript/embind.html#).
Temporarily using preferred layout **NHWC** for WebNN graph partitions
since the restriction in WebNN XNNPack backend implementation and the
ongoing
[discussion](https://github.com/webmachinelearning/webnn/issues/324) in
WebNN spec that whether WebNN should support both 'NHWC' and 'NCHW'
layouts. No WebNN native EP, only for Web.
**Motivation and Context**:
Allow ONNXRuntime Web developers to access WebNN API to benefit from
hardware acceleration.
**WebNN API Implementation Status in Chromium**:
- Tracked in Chromium issue:
[#1273291](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1273291)
- **CPU device**: based on XNNPack backend, and had been available on
Chrome Canary M112 behind "#enable-experimental-web-platform-features"
flag for Windows and Linux platforms. Further implementation for more
ops is ongoing.
- **GPU device**: based on DML, implementation is ongoing.
**Open**:
- GitHub CI: WebNN currently is only available on Chrome Canary/Dev with
XNNPack backend for Linux and Windows. This is an open to reviewers to
help identify which GitHub CI should involved the WebNN EP and guide me
to enable it. Thanks!
### Description
Fix the bug in #15693
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
### Description
- Updates the default QNN SDK for CI pipelines to version 2.10.0.
- Disables convolution op tests that run on the QNN CPU backend due to a
potential bug with QNN SDK 2.10.0.
### Motivation and Context
Allows us to test the latest QNN SDK in default CI pipeline runs.
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->
Various fixes to the CSharp setup
- fix warnings
- fix invalid tests
- update test sdk nuget package
- enables testing on linux
- fixes issue with some unit tests not running in CI
- run unit tests in linux pipeline using dotnet
### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
Unit tests weren't breaking in CIs for both Windows and Linux builds and
should have been.
### Description
add target ort.webgpu.min.js
WebGPU is experimental feature, so I don't want to put webgpu into the
ort.min.js file. This change adds 2 ways for users to access ort-web
with webgpu:
- using script tag: by URL
`https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/onnxruntime-web@1.15.0/dist/ort.webgpu.min.js`
( this URL is not ready yet )
- using `import()`: use `import { Tensor, InferenceSession } from
'onnxruntime-web/webgpu';` - 'onnxruntime-web/webgpu' instead of
'onnxruntime-web'
### Description
latest emsdk generated multi-thread version sometimes crash with unknown
reason ( error: memory access out of bounds ).
we don't want to break existing ort-web users, so revert emsdk back to
3.1.19 (same to what ort v1.14.0 uses)
### Description
1. Update VERSION_NUMBER for preparing the upcoming release. This PR's
commit will not be included in the 1.15 release branch
2. Delete package/rpm/onnxruntime.spec since it was not used in past
years.
### Motivation and Context
Preparing the release.
Fixed
[AB#15311](https://aiinfra.visualstudio.com/6a833879-cd9b-44a4-a9de-adc2d818f13c/_workitems/edit/15311)
### Description
They were missed in #15707 , because they are not in common places for Dockerfiles.
Though this commit updated tools/ci_build/github/pai/rocm-ci-pipeline-env.Dockerfile, it won't automatically take effect. The image needs to be manually generated and pushed to a place, and before doing that our CMakeLists.txt also needs to be tweaked a little bit.
### Description
This is the first part to create a webassembly artifacts for ort-web
webgpu EP (wasm build).
there will be following steps to consume the artifacts in web build
### Description
Download protoc from Github Release instead of Nuget to avoid having
dependency on nuget.exe on Linux
### Motivation and Context
To avoid having dependency on nuget.exe on Linux. Many users' build
environment do not have nuget or dotnet.
### Description
This change will allow us building CUDA EP without installing CUDA SDK
on Windows.
### Motivation and Context
Nvidia's CUDA installer comes with a VS extension. In the past, we
require installing the extension. It is a little bit inconvenient since:
1. Visual Studio must be installed before CUDA SDK. CUDA's installer
will not install the extension if your machine doesn't have Visual
Studio.
2. We need to install CUDA SDK on our build machines, instead of just
downloading it and using it.
After this change, we will not need to install CUDA SDK on our build
machines. So it will be easier to add a support for a different CUDA
version.
Also, fix two PreFast warnings.
### Description
This PR creates Nuget and Android for Training.
### Motivation and Context
These packages are intended to be released in ORT 1.15 to enable
On-Device Training Scenarios.
## Packaging Story for Learning On The Edge Release
### Nuget Packages:
1. New Native package -> **Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Training** (Native
package will contain binaries for: win-x86, win-x64, win-arm, win-arm64,
linux-x64, linux-arm64, android)
2. C# bindings will be added to existing package ->
**Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Managed**
### Android Package published to Maven:
1. New package for training (full build) ->
**onnxruntime-training-android-full-aar**
### Python Package published to PyPi:
1. Python bindings and offline tooling will be added to the existing ort
training package -> **onnxruntime-training**
### Description
Originally VitisAI EP only works with old version of VitisAI release.
### Motivation and Context
Update VitisAI EP so that it works together with the current VitisiAI
3.5 and further version of VitisAI. We try our best to make it forward
compatible.
---------
Co-authored-by: Wang Chunye <chunywan@xilinx.com>
Co-authored-by: mingyue <mingyue@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: mingyueliuh <131847423+mingyueliuh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: liumingyue <mingyue@xilinx.com>
Co-authored-by: moore-ch <129165652+moore-ch@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: shoucair <shoucai.ren@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: zz002 <zhenze.wang@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: BoarQing <yuz75@Pitt.edu>
Co-authored-by: Yueqing Zhang <yueqingz@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <Scott.McKay@microsoft.com>
### Description
All our Windows build pipelines already uses cmake 3.26 except one
pipeline: QNN ARM64.
This PR does the same for Linux build pipelines.
### Motivation and Context
This change is related to #15704 .
### Description
- Update to QNN SDK 2.9.0 for QNN pipelines
- Temporarily disable warnings as errors for QNN Windows x64 pipeline
- Note that this pipeline did not previously run to completion. It also
currently does not run for pull requests.
### Motivation and Context
Need to update and test the latest available version of the QNN SDK.
Rename onnxruntime-Linux-CPU-2019 machine pool to
"onnxruntime-Ubuntu2004-AMD-CPU". The old one has an internal error and
stuck there. I cannot make any change to it. It has been like this for
more than 1 week. So I created a new pool with the same setting except
the name is different.
Also, move some android pipelines to
"onnxruntime-Linux-CPU-For-Android-CI" which uses a standard image from
https://github.com/actions/runner-images
### Description
* Update TensorRT 8.6 lib dependencies in dockerfile of TRT EP Perf
pipeline
* Avoid using `--allow_running_as_root` and build ORT with non-root user
### Motivation and Context
To fix the build issue on EP perf pipeline
Fixed
[AB#14615]
### Description
Add parameters to make some stages could use other run's intermediate
output.
### Motivation and Context
nuget workflow has 38 stages of 4 layers.
We had to run the whole workflow from begining to test one stage.
It could make life easier to run only one stage for testing.
like
### N.B.
In this PR, Nuget_Test_Linux_CPU, Nuget_Test_LinuxGPU and
Jar_Packaging_GPU are enabled as the first step.
So I can start to move tests from Linux host to container
### Description
In 2021 we restricted onnx node test CI execution in range of opset
14-15 for ORT-TRT, which was the latest opset that TRT EP could support
Update this range to opset 14-17 to improve the ORT-TRT unit test
coverage, as [Nvidia announced that TRT 8.6 supported
opset17](https://github.com/onnx/onnx-tensorrt/blob/main/docs/operators.md)
### Description
* Reverting default TensorRT version to 8.5 as temporary fix
* Apart from that, this PR temporarily leaves this CI as a place to
validate user behavior that uses TRT 8.5 with latest ORT
### Context
* This CI pool equips 2xTesla M60 GPUs, which are no longer supported by
TensorRT 8.6.
* Currently, other CIs are using single-T4 VM but there's no VM with
2xT4 or other suitable dualGPU in the range.
* Once we decide which VM instance for this CI to migrate to, TRT8.6 can
be enabled on this CI
* According to
[Nvidia](https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/tensorrt/release-notes/index.html):
* TensorRT 8.5.3 was the last release supporting NVIDIA Kepler (SM 3.x)
and NVIDIA Maxwell (SM 5.x) devices. *These devices are no longer
supported in TensorRT 8.6*. NVIDIA Pascal (SM 6.x) devices are
deprecated in TensorRT 8.6.
### Description
This PR resolves a part of non-critical comments from code review
comments in #14579.
- use `USE_JSEP` instead of `USE_JS` in build definition to make it less
ambiguous
- remove unused util functions from util.ts
- fix transpose.h
- other misc fixes
### Description
The PR adds VPU support to OpenVINO Execution Provider
Bug fixes for GPU, CPU.
Changes to OpenVINO Backend in Serialized Model API for faster First
Inference Latency.
Deprecation to HDDL-VADM and MYRIAD, removed code
Support OpenVINO 2023.0
Dynamic Shapes Support for iGPU
### Motivation and Context
- VPU is an upcoming hardware that can provide AI Acceleration for
Client Systems through OpenVINO
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
---------
Signed-off-by: MaajidKhan <n.maajid.khan@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Suryaprakash Shanmugam <suryaprakash.shanmugam@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: MaajidKhan <n.maajid.khan@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Preetha Veeramalai <preetha.veeramalai@intel.com>
### Description
Update cuda 11.6 to 11.8 for Windows pipelines
This PR is just for Windows CUDA pipelines. It does include any change
for Linux pipelines or TensorRT pipelines
### Motivation and Context
It is a planned feature for the upcoming ONNX Runtime release.
### Description
Adding the fp16 onnx operator implementations:
maxpool, averagepool, global average pool, relu, leaky relu
### Motivation and Context
Continue with support for fp16. Standard onnx operator implementations are needed as a basis for the graph optimizers to work.
### Description
This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime
Web:
- JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP)
- Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify
- WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript
- initial implementation of kernels:
- elementwise operators (22)
- binary operators (5)
- tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm
- nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool
Code need to be polished. still working on it.
## Q&A
What is JSEP?
> JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime
execution provider that specifically works on Web environment
(browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places
when ONNX Runtime inferences a model.
Why JSEP?
> JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and
TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we
introduces JSEP:
> 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities
as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the
capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to
develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel
implementation.
> 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg.
`buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a
synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done
by using Emscripten's Asyncify.
What is WebGPU?
> WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the
only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the
other is WebGL).
> WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing
to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance
for model inferencing that currently available.
What is the async problem and why we have the problem?
> The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async
function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code:
> ```c
> // C-style declarations (API)
> typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data);
> void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete);
>
> // implementation
> DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) {
> // how to implement?
> }
> ```
> The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we
try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async
function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser
environment, neither is possible.
>
> WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU
to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()`
will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU,
and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal
way.
What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem?
> Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to
compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on
browsers.
>
> Asyncify is a [compiler
feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows
calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it
generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async
execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function
inside `OrtRun()` call.
## Design Overview
**Inter-op**
JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an
interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in
onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js:
```js
// init JSEP
Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) {
Module.jsepBackend = backend;
Module.jsepAlloc = alloc;
Module.jsepFree = free;
Module.jsepCopy = copy;
Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync;
Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel;
Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel;
Module.jsepRun = run;
};
```
This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level
functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data
transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime:
- `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module
- `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc()
and Free()
- `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU)
- `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU)
- `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object
that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT
- `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this
The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections
and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript.
**Resource Management**
Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the
implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible
to implement the callbacks correctly.
For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map
(tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton.
Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program),
while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including
attributes) and input shapes.
**about data transfer**
`js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized
or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or
not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function
to be called in the synchronized context.
**run kernel in JS**
Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an
optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into
JavaScript.
`Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is
performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using
the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`.
**disabled features**
memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not
presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by
offset + size).
concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has
async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly
increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it.
**prefer channels last**
JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method
`GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to
preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized
WebGPU shader can be used.
**Testing code**
It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not
contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel
registration which need to work together with the corresponding
JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from
JavaScript API.
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
