ltl-accumulator-verified/README.md
mrwulf cfde9b2cd7 S5 stage 2: extractConsNode extractor defined (consistency, Theorem 3 steps 1-2)
The consistency collision extractor: walks the ConsRec new-root fold in
parallel with the honest size-n tree of D₁ and returns the concrete
colliding node preimage pair at the first level where the fold's hnode
argument pair diverges from the honest node — or none if the fold is
genuine all the way down (binding holds). Both branches verified faithful
to ConsRec's hnode argument order (n₀≤k: y' left / s right; n₀>k: s left
/ y' right). Termination via kbelow bounds.

Deliberate honest checkpoint: the DEFINITION compiles and is cone-audited
[propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound]; the binding CORRECTNESS proof — the
single hardest object in the corpus — is stage 3, kept for a fresh
session rather than a rushed long turn. 22 certs green. LTL untouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-11 17:55:51 +02:00

36 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown

# ltl-accumulator-verified
Lean 4 mechanization of the security analysis (§6) of the paper
"The Lean Transparency Log" (https://ltl.zkdefi.org/paper): the Merkle
accumulator's own correctness and soundness theorems, kernel-checked, in
the same discipline as the four `*-ed25519-verified` subject corpora.
## Status: layer scaffold (work in progress — honest ledger below)
| layer | content | status |
|---|---|---|
| L1 | bytes, hleaf/hnode, domain separation (Lemma 1) | **done** (domsep: axiom-free) |
| L2 | MTH, Root, ConsRec definitions + termination | **done** (cones: propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound) |
| L3 | inclusion completeness (Theorem 1) | **done** (incl_complete: propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound) |
| L4 | frontier binding content (Lemma 2) | **inlined in the extractor walk** (extractIncl); standalone receipt-uniqueness theorem queued for S4 restoration in extractor form |
| L5 | inclusion soundness = EXPLICIT extractor `extractIncl` (Theorem 2) **done, non-vacuous** |
| L6a | descent extractor `extractMTH` (Theorem 3 step 3 = Lemma 2, WHOLE-TREE instance) **done, non-vacuous** |
| — | Lemma 2, PATH instance (receipt-uniqueness of `Root`): deleted with the vacuous `root_binding` in S3.5 and **not yet restored**; optional, not needed for Theorem 3 |
| L6b | ConsRec binding + Theorem 3 assembly (extractCons) | in progress (S5): stage-1 arithmetic/list infrastructure done (kbelow_prefix_eq, take surgery); stage-1 infra + extractConsNode extractor DEFINED; binding proof (steps 1-2) + extractCons assembly = stage 3 |
| L6 | pin-store state machine safety (Proposition 1) | pending |
## Discipline (identical to the subject corpora)
- `verification/Proofs/` contains ZERO `axiom` declarations; the single
sanctioned axiom site is `verification/gen/` — here, one opaque
function: SHA-256. The theorems are constructive collision extractors,
so collision resistance is never assumed, only interpreted.
- `verification/check.sh` is THE button: compiles every file through
`lean-guard` (memory cap, core pinning, timeout, single-flight lock)
and axiom-audits every certificate against its documented exact cone.
- Expected boundary: `propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound` plus
`LTLAcc.sha256` for hash-touching certificates — documented per
certificate in `check.sh`, audited both directions.
The finished certificates are destined for the LTL itself as attestation
leaves: the log carrying kernel-checked proofs of its own machinery.