mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/ltl-accumulator-verified.git
synced 2026-09-04 20:03:44 +00:00
mrwulf
be232507cc
The 'descend' step of the paper's Theorem 3, built extractor-first per the S3.5 lesson (never a bare '∨ collision'): - extractMTH (D D'): total function that, given two equal-length leaf lists sharing a Merkle root, walks the common-shape tree to the first divergence and returns the concrete colliding preimage pair (a node pair, or a leaf pair at the bottom). - extractMTH_correct: |D|=|D'| ∧ D≠D' ∧ MTH D = MTH D' → IsCollision (extractMTH D D'). Proven by functional induction on extractMTH; composite case uses MTH_split + append_inj (fixed-width Hash) to split node preimages or exhibit the node collision. - extractMTH_nonvacuous: equal lists → output NOT a collision (pinned), so the conclusion is false for some inputs ⇒ choice-proof. This also RESTORES, in explicit non-vacuous form, the receipt-uniqueness content of Lemma 2 deleted in the S3.5 cleanup (re-audit F2): the honest Merkle fold is injective up to a collision. 18 certs green. Fable statement-audit passed (matches paper Thm 3 step 3 verbatim). LTL untouched (12 leaves, bcd15f9d). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
35 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
# ltl-accumulator-verified
|
|
|
|
Lean 4 mechanization of the security analysis (§6) of the paper
|
|
"The Lean Transparency Log" (https://ltl.zkdefi.org/paper): the Merkle
|
|
accumulator's own correctness and soundness theorems, kernel-checked, in
|
|
the same discipline as the four `*-ed25519-verified` subject corpora.
|
|
|
|
## Status: layer scaffold (work in progress — honest ledger below)
|
|
|
|
| layer | content | status |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| L1 | bytes, hleaf/hnode, domain separation (Lemma 1) | **done** (domsep: axiom-free) |
|
|
| L2 | MTH, Root, ConsRec definitions + termination | **done** (cones: propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound) |
|
|
| L3 | inclusion completeness (Theorem 1) | **done** (incl_complete: propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound) |
|
|
| L4 | frontier binding content (Lemma 2) | **inlined in the extractor walk** (extractIncl); standalone receipt-uniqueness theorem queued for S4 restoration in extractor form |
|
|
| L5 | inclusion soundness = EXPLICIT extractor `extractIncl` (Theorem 2) **done, non-vacuous** |
|
|
| L6a | descent extractor `extractMTH` (Theorem 3 step 3; restored receipt-uniqueness of Lemma 2) **done, non-vacuous** |
|
|
| L6b | ConsRec binding + Theorem 3 assembly (extractCons) | pending (S5) |
|
|
| L6 | pin-store state machine safety (Proposition 1) | pending |
|
|
|
|
## Discipline (identical to the subject corpora)
|
|
|
|
- `verification/Proofs/` contains ZERO `axiom` declarations; the single
|
|
sanctioned axiom site is `verification/gen/` — here, one opaque
|
|
function: SHA-256. The theorems are constructive collision extractors,
|
|
so collision resistance is never assumed, only interpreted.
|
|
- `verification/check.sh` is THE button: compiles every file through
|
|
`lean-guard` (memory cap, core pinning, timeout, single-flight lock)
|
|
and axiom-audits every certificate against its documented exact cone.
|
|
- Expected boundary: `propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound` plus
|
|
`LTLAcc.sha256` for hash-touching certificates — documented per
|
|
certificate in `check.sh`, audited both directions.
|
|
|
|
The finished certificates are destined for the LTL itself as attestation
|
|
leaves: the log carrying kernel-checked proofs of its own machinery.
|