mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/fips205-slhdsa-verified.git
synced 2026-09-03 19:53:49 +00:00
mrwulf
c80c2bba5b
Round-8 review (GPT-5.6, register key `slh-provenance-contradictory`, HIGH),
raised in round 7 and unfixed since.
The machine-enforced subject is unambiguous and appears in PROVENANCE.json and
extract.sh:
fips205-source @ a3ce8e8644fe302019ed7ae271912333f1476de4
It appeared in ZERO markdown files. The prose instead named three other
revisions across four documents — README `797b4ef`, TRUSTED-BASE `3153988`,
ATTESTATION-BASIS `c945821` — so a reader could not tell which Rust the proofs
are about. Subject identity is part of the attestation object: a proof about a
model is not evidence for an unspecified source revision.
README.md current snapshot head -> a3ce8e8, with the lineage
bea1051 -> 797b4ef -> a3ce8e8 stated explicitly and
matching PROVENANCE.json's own upstream_deviation text
TRUSTED-BASE.md current snapshot head -> a3ce8e8
ATTESTATION-BASIS.md subject -> a3ce8e8, AND the "four model_integrity_sha256
hashes" claim corrected: only TWO (Types.lean,
Funs.lean) are regenerated by extract.sh; the two
*External.lean files are hand-maintained and separately
byte-pinned. Stating four invites a reproducer to expect
extraction to produce files it never touches.
RECORDED-RUN.md IS DELIBERATELY NOT REWRITTEN. It records a run that really
happened on 2026-07-24 against `797b4ef`. Editing the identity of a past run to
match today's pin would falsify the record rather than correct it. It now
carries a header saying so and naming the current pin.
Independent extraction remains UNVERIFIED — no third party has regenerated the
Lean from the Rust. That is unchanged by this commit and is stated where a
reader will meet it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
34 KiB
34 KiB
Recorded clean run — check.sh + independent cone dump
HISTORICAL RECORD — read the pin below, not as the current one. This captures a run that really happened on 2026-07-24 against fips205-source
797b4ef. The CURRENT machine-enforced source pin isa3ce8e8(see PROVENANCE.json). The revision named throughout this file is deliberately left as it was: this is a record of what ran, and editing the identity of a past run to match today's pin would be falsifying the record rather than correcting it. Round-8 review (GPT-5.6) flagged that the pin appeared in no markdown file; the fix is to name it here and correct the CLAIMS elsewhere.
External review round 2 asked for a recorded clean run at the current pin
by a party with the toolchain, so a reviewer who cannot run Lean has current
evidence. Captured 2026-07-24. Pins are in PROVENANCE.json.
The cone dump below is an independent collectAxioms read (not the asserted
table in Proofs/Audit.lean); it matches each certificate's expected boundary.
RECORDED CLEAN RUN — fips205-slhdsa-verified
date(UTC): 20260724T171145Z
host lean: Lean (version 4.30.0-rc2, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, commit 3dc1a088b6d2d8eafe25a7cd7ec7b58d731bd7cc, Release)
source pin: 797b4ef26338e27363683656f93cb065a77daa0e
==============================================
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: axiom audit (exact cone per certificate — inside Lean) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED: each of the 11 certificate cones == its expected boundary set
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
=== INDEPENDENT cone dump (collectAxioms, 20260724T171253Z) ===
fips205.chain_free_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f
fips205.wots_loop1_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f
fips205.xmss_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.h
fips205.ht_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h, verify_mono.oracle.t_l
fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.h
fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h
fips205.to_int_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
fips205.to_byte_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff :: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound, verify_mono.oracle.f, verify_mono.oracle.h, verify_mono.oracle.h_msg, verify_mono.oracle.t_l, verify_mono.oracle.t_len
Locked cargo run under the pinned nightly (round-3 reviewer recommendation)
The differential test mono_matches_deployed_verify is the sole
verify_mono→deployed bridge; recorded here under --locked on the
toolchain pinned by rust-toolchain.toml (nightly-2026-06-01, the
transpiler's own channel). Note: the upstream integration-test files
hardcode all twelve parameter sets, so they only build with default
features — the single-feature run therefore uses --lib (which contains
the differential test), and the full suite runs with default features.
This explains the round-1 GPT observation that single-feature
cargo test fails to compile: an upstream test-layout property, not a
defect of the snapshot.
=== LOCKED CARGO RUN — fips205-source @ 797b4ef26338e27363683656f93cb065a77daa0e ===
date(UTC): 20260724T192246Z
toolchain: nightly-2026-06-01-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (overridden by '/home/oho/GitClone/FormalVerification/sources/fips205-source/rust-toolchain.toml')
--- (1) differential test (verify_mono vs deployed generic verifier), lib tests, SHA2-128s feature ---
running 2 tests
test verify_mono::tests::mono_matches_deployed_verify ... ok
test slh_dsa_sha2_128s::tests::simple_round_trips ... ok
test result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 10.82s
--- (2) full upstream suite, default features (all parameter sets), --locked ---
test src/traits.rs - traits::Signer::try_sign_with_rng (line 284) ... ok
test src/traits.rs - traits::Verifier::hash_verify (line 455) ... ok
test src/traits.rs - traits::Verifier::verify (line 415) ... ok
test result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 28.20s
--- (2b) full-suite summary lines (all test binaries + doctests) ---
running 13 tests
test result: ok. 13 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 39.25s
running 3 tests
test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 143.21s
running 1 test
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
running 12 tests
test result: ok. 12 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 6.39s
running 37 tests
test result: ok. 37 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 27.89s
INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator (the round-3 blocker)
Round 3's single remaining blocker was a recorded toolchain session
executed by a party other than the author agent. The operator ran the
block below personally on 2026-07-27 (a first attempt on 2026-07-24
failed with a memory-clamped lean abort on a loaded desktop — an
environment condition, diagnosed from ~/.lean-guard.log and addressed
by the lean-guard stderr-diagnostics commit 62d7ed1; the proofs were
never implicated). Result: check.sh ALL GREEN at 62d7ed1 (11
certificates, exact-cone audit passed) and extract.sh regeneration
byte-identical against fips205-source @ 797b4ef — both sha256 values
match PROVENANCE.json. Transcript verbatim from the operator's shell:
INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator, 20260727T125816Z
proof repo @ 62d7ed12091bb9bd267724b698f663c00ddc3210
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: axiom audit (exact cone per certificate — inside Lean) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED: each of the 11 certificate cones == its expected boundary set
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
--- extract.sh byte-identity ---
[0/2] provenance OK: fips205-source @ 797b4ef26338 (clean)
[1/2] charon: Rust -> LLBC (monomorphic SHA2-128s verify cone;
crate::verify_mono::oracle is the opaque SHA-2 boundary)
Compiling fips205 v0.4.1 (/home/oho/GitClone/FormalVerification/sources/fips205-source)
Finished `dev` profile [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.54s
[2/2] aeneas: LLBC -> Lean (split files, SlhVerify.* modules;
hand-maintained TypesExternal.lean / FunsExternal.lean are
NOT overwritten once they exist)
[[92mInfo[39m ] Imported: SlhVerify.llbc
[?25lApplied prepasses: [------------------------------------------------] 0/142 ⠋
Applied prepasses: [------------------------------------------------] 1/142 ⠋
Applied prepasses: [###---------------------------------------------] 11/142 ⠋
Applied prepasses: [#################-------------------------------] 52/142 ⠙
Applied prepasses: [########################################--------] 120/142 ⠙
Applied prepasses: [################################################] 142/142 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated globals: [-------------------------------------------------] 0/10 ⠋
Translated globals: [#################################################] 10/10 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated opaque functions: [----------------------------------------] 0/76 ⠋
Translated opaque functions: [########################################] 76/76 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated transparent functions: [-----------------------------------] 0/42 ⠋
Translated transparent functions: [-----------------------------------] 1/42 ⠙
Translated transparent functions: [#######----------------------------] 9/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [########---------------------------] 10/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [##########-------------------------] 12/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [##########-------------------------] 13/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [###########------------------------] 14/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [############-----------------------] 15/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [##############---------------------] 17/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [###############--------------------] 19/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [################-------------------] 20/42 ⠼
Translated transparent functions: [##################-----------------] 22/42 ⠼
Translated transparent functions: [####################---------------] 24/42 ⠼
Translated transparent functions: [#####################--------------] 26/42 ⠴
Translated transparent functions: [######################-------------] 27/42 ⠴
Translated transparent functions: [#######################------------] 28/42 ⠦
Translated transparent functions: [########################-----------] 29/42 ⠦
Translated transparent functions: [#########################----------] 30/42 ⠦
Translated transparent functions: [#########################----------] 31/42 ⠧
Translated transparent functions: [###########################--------] 33/42 ⠇
Translated transparent functions: [#############################------] 35/42 ⠏
Translated transparent functions: [##############################-----] 36/42 ⠏
Translated transparent functions: [##############################-----] 37/42 ⠋
Translated transparent functions: [###############################----] 38/42 ⠙
Translated transparent functions: [################################---] 39/42 ⠹
Translated transparent functions: [#################################--] 40/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [##################################-] 41/42 ⠸
Translated transparent functions: [###################################] 42/42 ⠼
Translated transparent functions: [###################################] 42/42 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated trait declarations: [--------------------------------------] 0/33 ⠋
Translated trait declarations: [##############------------------------] 13/33 ✔️
[?25h[?25lTranslated trait impls: [---------------------------------------------] 0/50 ⠋
Translated trait impls: [######################-----------------------] 25/50 ✔️
[?25h[?25lPost-processed translated opaque functions: [-------------------------] 0/76 ⠋
Post-processed translated opaque functions: [-------------------------] 1/76 ⠙
Post-processed translated opaque functions: [#########################] 76/76 ✔️
[?25h[?25lPost-processed translated transparent functions: [--------------------] 0/42 ⠋
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [--------------------] 1/42 ⠙
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###-----------------] 7/42 ⠙
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####----------------] 9/42 ⠙
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####----------------] 10/42 ⠹
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#####---------------] 11/42 ⠹
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#####---------------] 12/42 ⠸
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [######--------------] 13/42 ⠸
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [######--------------] 14/42 ⠸
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#######-------------] 15/42 ⠼
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#######-------------] 16/42 ⠼
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [########------------] 17/42 ⠼
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#########-----------] 19/42 ⠴
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#########-----------] 20/42 ⠴
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 21/42 ⠴
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 22/42 ⠦
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##########----------] 23/42 ⠦
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###########---------] 25/42 ⠦
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [############--------] 26/42 ⠧
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [############--------] 27/42 ⠧
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#############-------] 28/42 ⠧
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##############------] 30/42 ⠇
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###############-----] 32/42 ⠇
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###############-----] 33/42 ⠏
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [################----] 34/42 ⠏
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [#################---] 37/42 ⠋
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##################--] 38/42 ⠋
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [##################--] 39/42 ⠙
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###################-] 40/42 ⠹
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [###################-] 41/42 ⠸
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####################] 42/42 ⠼
Post-processed translated transparent functions: [####################] 42/42 ✔️
[?25h[[92mInfo[39m ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
[[92mInfo[39m ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal_Template.lean
[[92mInfo[39m ] Generated: gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
[[92mInfo[39m ] Total execution time: 8.980301 seconds
Done. Now run ./check.sh (Phase 1: the regenerated model must type-check).
db720b4a30f512e6048212a472e6853b24931a8121cb94c4cf7e6489754d6384 gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
7b7de55fd0206142f2678a079a6ed4462292356bc7de08ecd55cac0c76a1da9f gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
Round-4 hardening (third reviewer, 2026-07-27)
The third reviewer demonstrated three fail-opens OUTSIDE the cone check (F1 unbound cert set / un-manifested theorem; F2 statements unbound; F3 model bytes unbound). All fixed. check.sh green with the hardened gate, and the adversarial self-test then rejected eight attacks including the two the reviewer used to make the button green over a repo proving False.
CORRECTION (2026-07-27, found by an independent audit of this file). The
three lines that stood here inside the fence below were not console output:
they were a hand-written summary of the run, fenced as if captured. check.sh
never printed them. The author wrote them; that is fabricated evidence in the
one document whose stated purpose is to carry machine evidence to reviewers who
cannot run the toolchain, and it is exactly the failure this project exists to
prevent. They have been removed. The selftest transcript that follows in the
same fence is verbatim.
Two further corrections to this file's framing:
- the "INDEPENDENT RUN — executed by the operator" block above is at proof repo
62d7ed1, which predates the round-4 gate (its transcript has no Phase 0). It is genuine and operator-executed, but it is not a run of the gate that now ships; - consequently, at the time of writing there was no recorded run of the current gate by an independent party. Any transcript below this line that is not explicitly attributed to a named party was produced by the author agent.
Rule adopted going forward: no text is placed inside a fence in this file unless
it was captured with tee/cat from the real command, and every evidence block
states its date, its pin, and who ran it.
check-selftest: attacking the gates
====================================
✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate)
✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named)
✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset)
✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom)
✓ attack 5 rejected (module enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass)
✓ attack 6 rejected (statement fingerprint — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass)
✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity — a hand-edited model cannot compile)
✓ attack 8 rejected (manifest fingerprint — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass)
SELFTEST GREEN: the gate rejects dead files, extra axioms, dropped oracles,
vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems, gutted statements, hand-edited
models, and deleted manifest rows.
Round-5 hardening — author-agent run, 20260727T205716Z, proof repo @ (this commit)
Captured with tee from the real commands; nothing below was typed by hand.
Not independently executed — an independent run of this gate is still outstanding.
check.sh
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 0: build hygiene + model/harness integrity ===
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal.lean
✓ lean-guard
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: in-Lean audit (cones + statement fingerprints + enumeration) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED
✓ audit-manifest digest matches (sha256 d83e297a49094c97…)
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
check-selftest.sh (14 attacks + digest-coverage check)
check-selftest: attacking the gates
====================================
✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate)
✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named)
✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset)
✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — a vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom)
✓ attack 5 rejected (enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass)
✓ attack 6 rejected (statement check — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass)
✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity)
✓ attack 8 rejected (audit-manifest digest — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass)
✓ attack 9 rejected (digest covers allowedBoundary — the policy cannot be widened silently)
✓ attack 10 rejected (a specification fold cannot be silently redefined to the loop)
✓ attack 11 rejected (enumeration covers every declaration kind, not just theorems)
✓ attack 12 rejected (the auditor audits itself — no exemption)
✓ attack 13 rejected (Phase 0 pins lean-guard — the harness is in the TCB and bound)
✓ attack 14 rejected (no .lean may sit outside gen/ and Proofs/)
✓ check 15 passed (the hashed block carries all 12 reference-fold bodies,
./check-selftest.sh: line 270: _f: command not found
including the recursive companions and their extracted-primitive calls)
SELFTEST GREEN: 14 attacks rejected + digest-coverage check — dead files, extra axioms, dropped
oracles, vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems AND defs, gutted
statements, hand-edited models, dropped manifest rows, widened policy,
specification folds redefined to the loop, a False-proof in the auditor,
a stubbed harness, and stray modules.
Note: the _f: command not found line in the selftest transcript above is a
cosmetic shell-quoting bug in the script's own success message (backticks inside
a double-quoted echo), fixed in this same commit. It did not affect any gate.
Round-6 hardening — author-agent run, 20260728T072212Z, proof repo @ (this commit)
Captured with tee from the real commands. Not independently executed.
PIN ROTATIONS IN THIS COMMIT (stated explicitly — round-6 NEW-11):
· harness_integrity_sha256 GAINS Proofs/Audit.lean (6108b97d…) — new pin, NEW-7.
· no model pin rotated; gen/ bytes unchanged.
check.sh
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 0: build hygiene + model/harness integrity ===
✓ Proofs/Audit.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal.lean
✓ lean-guard
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: in-Lean audit (cones + statement fingerprints + enumeration) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED
✓ audit-manifest digest matches (sha256 d83e297a49094c97…)
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
check-selftest.sh (16 attacks + digest-coverage check)
check-selftest: attacking the gates
====================================
✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate)
✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named)
✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset)
✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — a vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom)
✓ attack 5 rejected (enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass)
✓ attack 6 rejected (statement check — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass)
✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity)
✓ attack 8 rejected (audit-manifest digest — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass)
✓ attack 9 rejected (digest covers allowedBoundary — the policy cannot be widened silently)
✓ attack 10 rejected (a specification fold cannot be silently redefined to the loop)
✓ attack 11 rejected (enumeration covers every declaration kind, not just theorems)
✓ attack 12 rejected (the auditor audits itself — no exemption)
✓ attack 13 rejected (Phase 0 pins lean-guard — the harness is in the TCB and bound)
✓ attack 14 rejected (no .lean may sit outside gen/ and Proofs/)
✓ attack 16 rejected (Phase 0 purges every .olean under verification/, so an
orphan compiled module with no source cannot satisfy an import)
✓ attack 17 rejected (Phase 0 pins Audit.lean — its LOGIC cannot be silently switched off)
✓ check 15 passed (the hashed block carries all 12 reference-fold bodies,
including the recursive _f companions and their extracted-primitive calls)
SELFTEST GREEN: 16 attacks rejected + digest-coverage check — dead files, extra axioms, dropped
oracles, vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems AND defs, gutted
statements, hand-edited models, dropped manifest rows, widened policy,
specification folds redefined to the loop, a False-proof in the auditor,
a stubbed harness, and stray modules.
Round-7 fixes — author-agent run, 20260728T110335Z, proof repo @ (this commit)
Captured with tee. NOT independently executed — but note that the third
reviewer DID independently run check.sh and check-selftest.sh to green at
dce0473 and 1e50295 on its own hardware and toolchain build, and recomputed
the audit digest outside check.sh. What remains author-attested-only is
extract.sh's byte-identical regeneration, which no reviewer has observed.
PIN ROTATIONS: source 3153988 -> c945821 (test/vector only; all four model files verified byte-identical across it). No model or harness pin rotated.
NOTE (round-7 NEW-16): the entire empirical bridge runs on STABLE Rust —
no Charon, Aeneas, OCaml or pinned nightly required. The nightly pin exists
only to align charon cargo. A third party can reproduce all 137 bridge
cases with cargo alone.
check.sh
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 0: build hygiene + model/harness integrity ===
✓ Proofs/Audit.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal.lean
✓ lean-guard
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: in-Lean audit (cones + statement fingerprints + enumeration) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED
✓ audit-manifest digest matches (sha256 d83e297a49094c97…)
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
cargo test on STABLE rust (rustc 1.95)
running 6 tests
deployed vs NIST ACVP 128s (prehash): 3 executed, 4 wrong-length, 7 skipped (hash function not implemented by this crate)
test verify_mono::tests::deployed_matches_nist_acvp_128s_prehash ... ok
mono vs NIST ACVP 128s (internal): 10 executed against the PROVED path, 4 rejected at deserialization (above the extraction root)
test verify_mono::tests::mono_matches_nist_acvp_128s_internal ... ok
mono+deployed vs NIST ACVP 128s (external pure): 10 executed (9 with a NON-EMPTY context), 4 rejected at deserialization
test verify_mono::tests::mono_matches_nist_acvp_128s_external_pure ... ok
test verify_mono::tests::mono_matches_deployed_verify ... ok
test slh_dsa_sha2_128s::tests::simple_round_trips ... ok
randomized differential bridge: 108 assertion points
test verify_mono::tests::mono_matches_deployed_randomized ... ok
test result: ok. 6 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 25.59s
check-selftest.sh (17 attacks + digest-coverage check)
check-selftest: attacking the gates
====================================
✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate)
✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named)
✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset)
✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — a vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom)
✓ attack 5 rejected (enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass)
✓ attack 6 rejected (statement check — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass)
✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity)
✓ attack 8 rejected (audit-manifest digest — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass)
✓ attack 9 rejected (digest covers allowedBoundary — the policy cannot be widened silently)
✓ attack 10 rejected (a specification fold cannot be silently redefined to the loop)
✓ attack 11 rejected (enumeration covers every declaration kind, not just theorems)
✓ attack 12 rejected (the auditor audits itself — no exemption)
✓ attack 13 rejected (Phase 0 pins lean-guard — the harness is in the TCB and bound)
✓ attack 14 rejected (no .lean may sit outside gen/ and Proofs/)
✓ attack 16 rejected (Phase 0 purges every .olean under verification/, so an
orphan compiled module with no source cannot satisfy an import)
✓ attack 17 rejected (Phase 0 pins Audit.lean — its LOGIC cannot be silently switched off)
✓ attack 18 rejected (the pin map cannot be silently shortened — required names are in check.sh)
✓ check 15 passed (the hashed block carries all 12 reference-fold bodies,
including the recursive _f companions and their extracted-primitive calls)
SELFTEST GREEN: 17 attacks rejected + digest-coverage check — dead files, extra axioms, dropped
oracles, vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems AND defs, gutted
statements, hand-edited models, dropped manifest rows, widened policy,
specification folds redefined to the loop, a False-proof in the auditor,
a stubbed harness, stray modules, and a shortened pin map.
Round-8 — author-agent run, 20260728T124039Z, proof repo @ (this commit)
Captured with tee. The third reviewer independently ran check.sh and
check-selftest.sh to green at 1bc4f39 on its own hardware and toolchain, and
recomputed the audit digest outside check.sh — see ATTESTATION-BASIS.md.
PIN ROTATIONS: harness_integrity_sha256 GAINS check-selftest.sh, drill.sh and
extract.sh (the harness set is now self-derived from the executable bit);
check-selftest.sh re-pinned twice during this round as it was edited. No model
pin rotated; the audit digest is unchanged at d83e297a….
check.sh
fips205-slhdsa-verified — check
===============================
=== Phase 0: build hygiene + model/harness integrity ===
✓ Proofs/Audit.lean
✓ check-selftest.sh
✓ drill.sh
✓ extract.sh
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Funs.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/Types.lean
✓ gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal.lean
✓ lean-guard
=== Phase 1: compile the extracted model ===
· gen/SlhVerify/TypesExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Types
· gen/SlhVerify/FunsExternal
· gen/SlhVerify/Funs
=== Phase 2: compile the proofs ===
· ChainSpec
· WotsSpec
· XmssSpec
· HtSpec
· ForsInnerSpec
· ForsOuterSpec
· InputPrepSpec
· ApexSpec
=== Phase 3: in-Lean audit (cones + statement fingerprints + enumeration) ===
✓ exact-cone audit PASSED
✓ audit-manifest digest matches (sha256 d83e297a49094c97…)
ALL GREEN — model compiles, proofs compile, and every certificate cone
equals EXACTLY the three kernel axioms plus its documented SHA-2 oracles.
Certificates proven: fips205.chain_free_loop_eq fips205.wots_loop1_eq fips205.xmss_loop_eq fips205.ht_loop_eq fips205.fors_inner_loop_eq fips205.fors_outer_loop_eq fips205.to_int_loop_eq fips205.to_byte_loop_eq fips205.wots_csum_loop_eq fips205.base2b_outer_loop_eq fips205.slh_verify_128s_accepts_iff
check-selftest.sh (17 attacks + digest-coverage check)
check-selftest: attacking the gates
====================================
✓ attack 1 rejected (dead-file gate)
✓ attack 2 rejected (extra-axiom detection — evil_ax named)
✓ attack 3 rejected (missing-oracle detection — exact cone, not subset)
✓ attack 4 rejected (existence check — a vanished cert cannot pass as 0-axiom)
✓ attack 5 rejected (enumeration — an un-manifested False theorem cannot pass)
✓ attack 6 rejected (statement check — a gutted statement of the same cone cannot pass)
✓ attack 7 rejected (Phase 0 model-byte integrity)
✓ attack 8 rejected (audit-manifest digest — a silently-dropped cert cannot pass)
✓ attack 9 rejected (digest covers allowedBoundary — the policy cannot be widened silently)
✓ attack 10 rejected (a specification fold cannot be silently redefined to the loop)
✓ attack 11 rejected (enumeration covers every declaration kind, not just theorems)
✓ attack 12 rejected (the auditor audits itself — no exemption)
✓ attack 13 rejected (Phase 0 pins lean-guard — the harness is in the TCB and bound)
✓ attack 14 rejected (no .lean may sit outside gen/ and Proofs/)
✓ attack 16 rejected (Phase 0 purges every .olean under verification/, so an
orphan compiled module with no source cannot satisfy an import)
✓ attack 17 rejected (Phase 0 pins Audit.lean — its LOGIC cannot be silently switched off)
✓ attack 18 rejected (the pin map cannot be silently shortened — required names are in check.sh)
✓ check 15 passed (the hashed block carries all 12 reference-fold bodies,
including the recursive _f companions and their extracted-primitive calls)
SELFTEST GREEN: 17 attacks rejected + digest-coverage check — dead files, extra axioms, dropped
oracles, vanished certs, un-manifested False theorems AND defs, gutted
statements, hand-edited models, dropped manifest rows, widened policy,
specification folds redefined to the loop, a False-proof in the auditor,
a stubbed harness, stray modules, and a shortened pin map.