Edit curve model description to use KaTeX

This commit is contained in:
Henry de Valence 2017-11-29 12:07:55 -08:00
parent 8cf03b673c
commit b2a85da09d

View file

@ -15,59 +15,112 @@
//!
//! Internally, we use several different models for the curve. Here
//! is a sketch of the relationship between the models, following [a
//! post](https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/curves/2016/000807.html)
//! by Ben Smith on the moderncrypto mailing list.
//! post][smith-moderncrypto]
//! by Ben Smith on the `moderncrypto` mailing list. This is also briefly
//! discussed in section 2.5 of [_Montgomery curves and their
//! arithmetic_][costello-smith-2017] by Costello and Smith.
//!
//! Begin with the affine equation for the curve,
//! $$
//! -x\^2 + y\^2 = 1 + dx\^2y\^2.
//! $$
//! Next, pass to the projective closure \\(\mathbb P\^1 \times \mathbb
//! P\^1 \\) by setting \\(x=X/Z\\), \\(y=Y/T.\\) Clearing denominators
//! gives the model
//! $$
//! -X\^2T\^2 + Y\^2Z\^2 = Z\^2T\^2 + dX\^2Y\^2.
//! $$
//! In `curve25519-dalek`, this is represented as the `CompletedPoint`
//! struct.
//! To map from \\(\mathbb P\^1 \times \mathbb P\^1 \\), a product of
//! two lines, to \\(\mathbb P\^3\\), we use the [Segre
//! embedding](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segre_embedding)
//! $$
//! \sigma : ((X:Z),(Y:T)) \mapsto (XY:XT:ZY:ZT).
//! $$
//! Using coordinates \\( (W_0:W_1:W_2:W_3) \\) for \\(\mathbb P\^3\\),
//! the image \\(\sigma (\mathbb P\^1 \times \mathbb P\^1) \\) is the
//! surface defined by \\( W_0 W_3 = W_1 W_2 \\), and under \\(
//! \sigma\\), the equation above becomes
//! $$
//! -W\_1\^2 + W\_2\^2 = W\_3\^2 + dW\_0\^2,
//! $$
//! so that the curve is given by the pair of equations
//! $$
//! \begin{aligned}
//! -W\_1\^2 + W\_2\^2 &= W\_3\^2 + dW\_0\^2, \\\\
//! W_0 W_3 &= W_1 W_2.
//! \end{aligned}
//! $$
//! Up to variable naming, this is exactly the "extended" curve model
//! introduced in [_Twisted Edwards Curves
//! Revisited_][hisil-wong-carter-dawson-2008] by Hisil, Wong, Carter,
//! and Dawson. In `curve25519-dalek`, it is represented as the
//! `ExtendedPoint` struct. We can map from \\(\mathbb P\^3 \\) to
//! \\(\mathbb P\^2 \\) by sending \\( (W\_0:W\_1:W\_2:W\_3) \\) to \\(
//! (W\_1:W\_2:W\_3) \\). Notice that
//! $$
//! \frac {W\_1} {W\_3} = \frac {XT} {ZT} = \frac X Z = x,
//! $$
//! and
//! $$
//! \frac {W\_2} {W\_3} = \frac {YZ} {ZT} = \frac Y T = y,
//! $$
//! so this is the same as if we had started with the affine model
//! and passed to \\( \mathbb P\^2 \\) by setting \\( x = W\_1 / W\_3
//! \\), \\(y = W\_2 / W\_3 \\).
//! Up to variable naming, this is the projective representation
//! introduced in in [_Twisted Edwards
//! Curves_][bernstein-birkner-joye-lange-peters-2008] by Bernstein,
//! Birkner, Joye, Lange, and Peters. In `curve25519-dalek`, it is
//! represented by the `ProjectivePoint` struct.
//!
//! -x² + y² = 1 + dx²y². <span style="float: right">(1)</span>
//! # Passing between curve models
//!
//! Next, pass to the projective closure 𝗣^1 x 𝗣^1 by setting x=X/Z,
//! y=Y/T. Clearing denominators gives the model
//! Although the \\( \mathbb P\^3 \\) model provides faster addition
//! formulas, the \\( \mathbb P\^2 \\) model provides faster doubling
//! formulas. Hisil, Wong, Carter, and Dawson therefore suggest mixing
//! coordinate systems for scalar multiplication, attributing the idea
//! to [a 1998 paper][cohen-miyaji-ono-1998] of Cohen, Miyagi, and Ono.
//!
//! -X²T² + Y²Z² = Z²T² + dX²Y².<span style="float: right">(2)<span>
//! Their suggestion is to vary the formulas used by context, using a
//! \\( \mathbb P\^2 \rightarrow \mathbb P\^2 \\) doubling formula when
//! a doubling is followed
//! by another doubling, a \\( \mathbb P\^2 \rightarrow \mathbb P\^3 \\)
//! doubling formula when a doubling is followed by an addition, and
//! computing point additions using a \\( \mathbb P\^3 \times \mathbb P\^3
//! \rightarrow \mathbb P\^2 \\) formula.
//!
//! To map from 𝗣^1 x 𝗣^1, a product of two lines, to 𝗣^3, we use the
//! Segre embedding,
//! The `ref10` reference implementation of [Ed25519][ed25519], by
//! Bernstein, Duif, Lange, Schwabe, and Yang, tweaks
//! this strategy, factoring the addition formulas through the
//! completion \\( \mathbb P\^1 \times \mathbb P\^1 \\), so that the
//! output of an addition or doubling always lies in \\( \mathbb P\^1 \times
//! \mathbb P\^1\\), and the choice of which formula to use is replaced
//! by a choice of whether to convert the result to \\( \mathbb P\^2 \\)
//! or \\(\mathbb P\^2 \\). However, this tweak is not described in
//! their paper, only in their software.
//!
//! σ : ((X:Z),(Y:T)) ↦ (XY:XT:ZY:ZT). <span style="float: right">(3)</span>
//! Our naming for the `CompletedPoint` (\\(\mathbb P\^1 \times \mathbb
//! P\^1 \\)), `ProjectivePoint` (\\(\mathbb P\^2 \\)), and
//! `ExtendedPoint` (\\(\mathbb P\^3 \\)) structs follows the naming in
//! Adam Langley's [Golang ed25519][agl-ed25519] implementation, which
//! `curve25519-dalek` was originally derived from.
//!
//! Using coordinates (W₀:W₁:W₂:W₃) for 𝗣^3, the image of σ(𝗣^1 x 𝗣^1)
//! is the surface defined by W₀W₃=W₁W₂, and under σ, equation (2)
//! becomes
//! Finally, to accelerate readditions, we use two cached point formats
//! in "Niels coordinates", named for Niels Duif,
//! one for the affine model and one for the \\( \mathbb P\^3 \\) model:
//!
//! -W₁² + W₂² = W₃² + dW₀². <span style="float: right">(4)</span>
//! * `AffineNielsPoint`: \\( (y+x, y-x, 2dxy) \\)
//! * `ProjectiveNielsPoint`: \\( (Y+X, Y-X, Z, 2dXY) \\)
//!
//! Up to variable naming, this is exactly the curve model introduced
//! in ["Twisted Edwards Curves
//! Revisited"](https://www.iacr.org/archive/asiacrypt2008/53500329/53500329.pdf)
//! by Hisil, Wong, Carter, and Dawson. We can map from 𝗣^3 to 𝗣² by
//! sending (W₀:W₁:W₂:W₃) to (W₁:W₂:W₃). Notice that
//!
//! W₁/W₃ = XT/ZT = X/Z = x <span style="float: right">(5)</span>
//!
//! W₂/W₃ = ZY/ZT = Y/T = y, <span style="float: right">(6)</span>
//!
//! so this is the same as if we had started with the affine model (1)
//! and passed to 𝗣^2 by setting `x = W₁/W₃`, `y = W₂/W₃`. Up to
//! variable naming, this is the projective representation introduced
//! in ["Twisted Edwards Curves"](https://eprint.iacr.org/2008/013).
//!
//! Following the implementation strategy in the ref10 reference
//! implementation for [Ed25519](https://ed25519.cr.yp.to/ed25519-20110926.pdf),
//! we use several different models for curve points:
//!
//! * `CompletedPoint`: points in 𝗣^1 x 𝗣^1;
//! * `ExtendedPoint`: points in 𝗣^3;
//! * `ProjectivePoint`: points in 𝗣^2.
//!
//! Finally, to accelerate additions, we use two cached point formats,
//! one for the affine model and one for the 𝗣^3 model:
//!
//! * `AffineNielsPoint`: `(y+x, y-x, 2dxy)`
//! * `ProjectiveNielsPoint`: `(Y+X, Y-X, Z, 2dXY)`
//!
//! [1]: https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/curves/2016/000807.html
//! [smith-moderncrypto]: https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/curves/2016/000807.html
//! [costello-smith-2017]: https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/212
//! [hisil-wong-carter-dawson-2008]: https://www.iacr.org/archive/asiacrypt2008/53500329/53500329.pdf
//! [bernstein-birkner-joye-lange-peters-2008]: https://eprint.iacr.org/2008/013
//! [cohen-miyaji-ono-1998]: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-49649-1_6.pdf
//! [ed25519]: https://eprint.iacr.org/2011/368
//! [agl-ed25519]: https://github.com/agl/ed25519
#![allow(non_snake_case)]