pytorch/test/cpp/jit/test_shape_analysis.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

498 lines
19 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Add Initial NNC Dynamic Shapes Flow (#66136) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66136 FOR REVIEWERS: this is ready to review, test failures comes from somewhere else in stack.. Takes in a TensorExprGraph of static shapes and generalizes the input shapes to symbolic dimensions. Dimensions of value 1 will be preserved, otherwise dimensions with the same value will be bucketed to the same symbolic shape. E.g. `Tensor(5, 3), Tensor(3, 1) -> Tensor(SS(-1), SS(-2)), Tensor(SS(-2), 1)` From there, runs symbolic shape inference on the graph, and creates a versioning if in the graph with prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard checking if the inputs at runtime match the Generalized Symbolic Shapes that are inputs to the TE Kernel. The computate to calculate all symbolic dimensions is inlined in to the if block with the TE Kernel. All Sym Dim Value* are appended to the end of the TE Kernel Graph/Node inputs, and the Node is augmented with a integer list attr `symbolic_shape_inputs` that gives the mapping from Value * -> Symbolic Shape int64_t value. For more lengthy IR examples and walkthrough look at ShapeAnalysisTest.DynamicShapesFusion in `test_shape_analysis` Returns True on Success, False on Failure, can fail if shape propagation fails to propagate # of dims or if complete shapes on inputs not set. Example transformation ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` -> ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) %5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4) block0(): %15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp) %16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp) %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]() %18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10 %elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10 %elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10 %cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29 %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3) -> (%3) block1(): %14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) -> (%14) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %SS_5 : int, %SS_4 : int, %SS_3 : int, %SS_2 : int): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar, anjali411 Differential Revision: D31797466 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: b508d2f5baef6e8e4020955ab1d4bc4b9c7bdfdd
2021-10-29 00:07:44 +00:00
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <ATen/core/interned_strings.h>
#include <c10/util/Exception.h>
#include <c10/util/Optional.h>
#include <test/cpp/jit/test_utils.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/ir/ir.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/ir/ir_views.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/ir/irparser.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/passes/constant_propagation.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/passes/symbolic_shape_analysis.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/passes/symbolic_shape_cache.h>
Add Initial NNC Dynamic Shapes Flow (#66136) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66136 FOR REVIEWERS: this is ready to review, test failures comes from somewhere else in stack.. Takes in a TensorExprGraph of static shapes and generalizes the input shapes to symbolic dimensions. Dimensions of value 1 will be preserved, otherwise dimensions with the same value will be bucketed to the same symbolic shape. E.g. `Tensor(5, 3), Tensor(3, 1) -> Tensor(SS(-1), SS(-2)), Tensor(SS(-2), 1)` From there, runs symbolic shape inference on the graph, and creates a versioning if in the graph with prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard checking if the inputs at runtime match the Generalized Symbolic Shapes that are inputs to the TE Kernel. The computate to calculate all symbolic dimensions is inlined in to the if block with the TE Kernel. All Sym Dim Value* are appended to the end of the TE Kernel Graph/Node inputs, and the Node is augmented with a integer list attr `symbolic_shape_inputs` that gives the mapping from Value * -> Symbolic Shape int64_t value. For more lengthy IR examples and walkthrough look at ShapeAnalysisTest.DynamicShapesFusion in `test_shape_analysis` Returns True on Success, False on Failure, can fail if shape propagation fails to propagate # of dims or if complete shapes on inputs not set. Example transformation ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` -> ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) %5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4) block0(): %15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp) %16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp) %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]() %18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10 %elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10 %elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10 %cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29 %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3) -> (%3) block1(): %14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) -> (%14) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %SS_5 : int, %SS_4 : int, %SS_3 : int, %SS_2 : int): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar, anjali411 Differential Revision: D31797466 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: b508d2f5baef6e8e4020955ab1d4bc4b9c7bdfdd
2021-10-29 00:07:44 +00:00
#include <torch/csrc/jit/passes/symbolic_shape_runtime_fusion.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/passes/utils/subgraph_utils.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/runtime/graph_iterator.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/runtime/interpreter.h>
#include <torch/csrc/jit/testing/file_check.h>
#include <torch/cuda.h>
#include <unordered_map>
namespace torch {
namespace jit {
namespace {
Node* findNode(std::shared_ptr<Graph>& g, Symbol k) {
DepthFirstGraphNodeIterator graph_it(g);
for (auto node = graph_it.next(); node != nullptr; node = graph_it.next()) {
if (node->kind() == k) {
return node;
}
}
TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT(false, "Couldn't find node");
}
} // namespace
TEST(ShapeAnalysisTest, DynamicShapesFusion) {
// Test Generalizing shapes to symbolic dimensions, guarding those symbolic
// dimensions and passing in runtime computed symbolic dimensions via inlined
// shape functions
std::shared_ptr<Graph> subgraph = std::make_shared<Graph>();
const auto graph_string = R"IR(
graph(%x.1 : Tensor, %y.1 : Tensor, %z: Tensor):
%11 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%3 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1)
%out1.1 : Tensor = aten::erf(%3)
%out2.1 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1)
%10 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%out1.1, %out2.1)
%25 : Tensor = aten::cat(%10, %11)
%28 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%25)
%29 : Tensor = aten::mul(%28, %z)
return (%28))IR";
torch::jit::parseIR(graph_string, subgraph.get());
/*
set up fused TensorExprGroup
*/
std::shared_ptr<Graph> g = std::make_shared<Graph>();
auto x_inp = g->addInput("x_inp");
auto y_inp = g->addInput("y_inp");
auto z_inp = g->addInput("z_inp");
auto x_type = TensorType::create(at::rand({10, 5}));
auto y_type = TensorType::create(at::rand({4, 5}));
auto z_type = TensorType::create(at::rand({1, 1}));
x_inp->setType(x_type);
y_inp->setType(y_type);
z_inp->setType(z_type);
subgraph->inputs().at(0)->setType(x_type);
subgraph->inputs().at(1)->setType(y_type);
subgraph->inputs().at(2)->setType(z_type);
subgraph->outputs().at(0)->setType(TensorType::create(at::rand({14, 5})));
Add Initial NNC Dynamic Shapes Flow (#66136) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66136 FOR REVIEWERS: this is ready to review, test failures comes from somewhere else in stack.. Takes in a TensorExprGraph of static shapes and generalizes the input shapes to symbolic dimensions. Dimensions of value 1 will be preserved, otherwise dimensions with the same value will be bucketed to the same symbolic shape. E.g. `Tensor(5, 3), Tensor(3, 1) -> Tensor(SS(-1), SS(-2)), Tensor(SS(-2), 1)` From there, runs symbolic shape inference on the graph, and creates a versioning if in the graph with prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard checking if the inputs at runtime match the Generalized Symbolic Shapes that are inputs to the TE Kernel. The computate to calculate all symbolic dimensions is inlined in to the if block with the TE Kernel. All Sym Dim Value* are appended to the end of the TE Kernel Graph/Node inputs, and the Node is augmented with a integer list attr `symbolic_shape_inputs` that gives the mapping from Value * -> Symbolic Shape int64_t value. For more lengthy IR examples and walkthrough look at ShapeAnalysisTest.DynamicShapesFusion in `test_shape_analysis` Returns True on Success, False on Failure, can fail if shape propagation fails to propagate # of dims or if complete shapes on inputs not set. Example transformation ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` -> ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) %5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4) block0(): %15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp) %16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp) %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]() %18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10 %elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10 %elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10 %cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29 %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3) -> (%3) block1(): %14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) -> (%14) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %SS_5 : int, %SS_4 : int, %SS_3 : int, %SS_2 : int): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar, anjali411 Differential Revision: D31797466 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: b508d2f5baef6e8e4020955ab1d4bc4b9c7bdfdd
2021-10-29 00:07:44 +00:00
auto output = g->insertNode(g->create(prim::TensorExprGroup))->output();
[JIT][NNC] Add handling of strides to dynamic shape support. (#70464) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/70464 Add handling of strided input tensors to dynamic fusion. This is done with the same set of input striding specializations as https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60684/: ``` S_ONE, // STRIDE_ONE: packed S_CONT, // STRIDE_CONTIGUOUS: stride[i + 1] * sizes[i + 1] S_TRAN_CONT, // STRIDE_TRANSPOSED_CONTIGUOUS: stride[i-1] * sizes[i-1] S_AS_ARG, // STRIDE_AS_ARG: stride passed in as runtime value ``` and then two additional specializations for a) contiguous tensor and b) channels-last tensor. channels-last is a common case and we should optimize for it. additionally, tensors natively store whether they are contiguous/channels-last contiguous, which makes it faster to check if tensors follow this pattern. Output striding will be done in a follow up. The striding is stored on both the TensorGroup node and on the guard node. The striding descriptors are stored as a vector of strings on the node for debugability and to make use of storing ivalues as attributes on nodes. As an example: ``` %8 : Double(10, 11, 12, 13, strides=[1716, 1, 143, 11], requires_grad=0, device=cpu) = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-37, -36, -35, -34], striding_inputs_desc=[["TENSOR_CONT_CHANNELS_LAST"]](%x, %24, %23, %22, %21)``` ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar Differential Revision: D33458649 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: c42616d3c683d70f6258180d23d3841a31a6030d
2022-01-12 17:08:04 +00:00
subgraph->outputs().at(0)->setType(TensorType::create(at::rand({14, 5})));
Add Initial NNC Dynamic Shapes Flow (#66136) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66136 FOR REVIEWERS: this is ready to review, test failures comes from somewhere else in stack.. Takes in a TensorExprGraph of static shapes and generalizes the input shapes to symbolic dimensions. Dimensions of value 1 will be preserved, otherwise dimensions with the same value will be bucketed to the same symbolic shape. E.g. `Tensor(5, 3), Tensor(3, 1) -> Tensor(SS(-1), SS(-2)), Tensor(SS(-2), 1)` From there, runs symbolic shape inference on the graph, and creates a versioning if in the graph with prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard checking if the inputs at runtime match the Generalized Symbolic Shapes that are inputs to the TE Kernel. The computate to calculate all symbolic dimensions is inlined in to the if block with the TE Kernel. All Sym Dim Value* are appended to the end of the TE Kernel Graph/Node inputs, and the Node is augmented with a integer list attr `symbolic_shape_inputs` that gives the mapping from Value * -> Symbolic Shape int64_t value. For more lengthy IR examples and walkthrough look at ShapeAnalysisTest.DynamicShapesFusion in `test_shape_analysis` Returns True on Success, False on Failure, can fail if shape propagation fails to propagate # of dims or if complete shapes on inputs not set. Example transformation ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` -> ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) %5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4) block0(): %15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp) %16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp) %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]() %18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10 %elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10 %elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10 %cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29 %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3) -> (%3) block1(): %14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) -> (%14) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %SS_5 : int, %SS_4 : int, %SS_3 : int, %SS_2 : int): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar, anjali411 Differential Revision: D31797466 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: b508d2f5baef6e8e4020955ab1d4bc4b9c7bdfdd
2021-10-29 00:07:44 +00:00
output->node()->addInput(x_inp);
output->node()->addInput(y_inp);
output->node()->addInput(z_inp);
output->node()->g_(attr::Subgraph, subgraph);
auto success = GenerateGuard(output->node());
TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT(success);
testing::FileCheck()
.check("TensorExprDynamicGuard")
->check_next("prim::If")
->check("aten::add")
->check("TensorExprGroup")
->check_same("symbolic_shape_inputs")
->check("block1")
->check("aten::cat")
Add Initial NNC Dynamic Shapes Flow (#66136) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66136 FOR REVIEWERS: this is ready to review, test failures comes from somewhere else in stack.. Takes in a TensorExprGraph of static shapes and generalizes the input shapes to symbolic dimensions. Dimensions of value 1 will be preserved, otherwise dimensions with the same value will be bucketed to the same symbolic shape. E.g. `Tensor(5, 3), Tensor(3, 1) -> Tensor(SS(-1), SS(-2)), Tensor(SS(-2), 1)` From there, runs symbolic shape inference on the graph, and creates a versioning if in the graph with prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard checking if the inputs at runtime match the Generalized Symbolic Shapes that are inputs to the TE Kernel. The computate to calculate all symbolic dimensions is inlined in to the if block with the TE Kernel. All Sym Dim Value* are appended to the end of the TE Kernel Graph/Node inputs, and the Node is augmented with a integer list attr `symbolic_shape_inputs` that gives the mapping from Value * -> Symbolic Shape int64_t value. For more lengthy IR examples and walkthrough look at ShapeAnalysisTest.DynamicShapesFusion in `test_shape_analysis` Returns True on Success, False on Failure, can fail if shape propagation fails to propagate # of dims or if complete shapes on inputs not set. Example transformation ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` -> ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) %5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4) block0(): %15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp) %16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp) %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]() %18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10 %elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10 %elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10 %cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29 %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3) -> (%3) block1(): %14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) -> (%14) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %SS_5 : int, %SS_4 : int, %SS_3 : int, %SS_2 : int): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar, anjali411 Differential Revision: D31797466 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: b508d2f5baef6e8e4020955ab1d4bc4b9c7bdfdd
2021-10-29 00:07:44 +00:00
->run(*g);
// clang-format off
/* Graph Should Look Something like: (note: strides not yet handled)
graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu),
%y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu),
%z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)):
%4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp)
%5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4)
block0():
%15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp)
%16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp)
%17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]()
%18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10
%elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10
%elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10
%cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29
%3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3)
-> (%3)
block1():
// FallbackGraph is inlined
Add Initial NNC Dynamic Shapes Flow (#66136) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66136 FOR REVIEWERS: this is ready to review, test failures comes from somewhere else in stack.. Takes in a TensorExprGraph of static shapes and generalizes the input shapes to symbolic dimensions. Dimensions of value 1 will be preserved, otherwise dimensions with the same value will be bucketed to the same symbolic shape. E.g. `Tensor(5, 3), Tensor(3, 1) -> Tensor(SS(-1), SS(-2)), Tensor(SS(-2), 1)` From there, runs symbolic shape inference on the graph, and creates a versioning if in the graph with prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard checking if the inputs at runtime match the Generalized Symbolic Shapes that are inputs to the TE Kernel. The computate to calculate all symbolic dimensions is inlined in to the if block with the TE Kernel. All Sym Dim Value* are appended to the end of the TE Kernel Graph/Node inputs, and the Node is augmented with a integer list attr `symbolic_shape_inputs` that gives the mapping from Value * -> Symbolic Shape int64_t value. For more lengthy IR examples and walkthrough look at ShapeAnalysisTest.DynamicShapesFusion in `test_shape_analysis` Returns True on Success, False on Failure, can fail if shape propagation fails to propagate # of dims or if complete shapes on inputs not set. Example transformation ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` -> ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) %5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4) block0(): %15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp) %16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp) %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]() %18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10 %elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10 %elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10 %cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29 %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3) -> (%3) block1(): %14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) -> (%14) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %SS_5 : int, %SS_4 : int, %SS_3 : int, %SS_2 : int): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar, anjali411 Differential Revision: D31797466 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: b508d2f5baef6e8e4020955ab1d4bc4b9c7bdfdd
2021-10-29 00:07:44 +00:00
%14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp)
-> (%14)
return ()
with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu),
%y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu),
%z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu),
%SS_5 : int,
%SS_4 : int,
%SS_3 : int,
%SS_2 : int):
%3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1)
%5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4)
%6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1)
%7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6)
%8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3)
%9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8)
%10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z)
return (%9)
*/
// clang-format on
DepthFirstGraphNodeIterator graph_it(g);
Node* te_group = findNode(g, prim::TensorExprGroup);
/*
Test that input to the kernel - (10, 5), (4, 5), (1, 1) - are correctly
generalized to sym dimensions, and that the output - (10 + 4, 5)
correctly preserves non-catted dim as sym shape and catted dim as new sym
shape
*/
auto tensorexpr_graph = te_group->g(attr::Subgraph);
auto inp1 = tensorexpr_graph->inputs().at(0)->type()->expect<TensorType>();
auto inp2 = tensorexpr_graph->inputs().at(1)->type()->expect<TensorType>();
auto inp3 = tensorexpr_graph->inputs().at(2)->type()->expect<TensorType>();
auto out = tensorexpr_graph->outputs().at(0)->type()->expect<TensorType>();
// 1 dims are preserved
auto inp3_sizes = inp3->sizes().concrete_sizes();
TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT(inp3_sizes);
TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT(
inp3_sizes->size() == 2 && inp3_sizes->at(0) == 1 &&
inp3_sizes->at(1) == 1);
// 5 made into sym shape
ASSERT_EQ(
inp1->symbolic_sizes()[1].value(), inp2->symbolic_sizes()[1].value());
ASSERT_EQ(
out->symbolic_sizes()[1].value(), inp2->symbolic_sizes()[1].value());
// 4, 10, 14 are different sym shapes
ASSERT_NE(
inp1->symbolic_sizes()[0].value(), inp2->symbolic_sizes()[0].value());
ASSERT_NE(
out->symbolic_sizes()[0].value(), inp1->symbolic_sizes()[0].value());
ASSERT_NE(
out->symbolic_sizes()[0].value(), inp2->symbolic_sizes()[0].value());
/*
Test guard behaves correctly at runtime and symbolic shapes are computed
correctly. As we don't have TE Kernel support for dynamic shapes we're
Add Initial NNC Dynamic Shapes Flow (#66136) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66136 FOR REVIEWERS: this is ready to review, test failures comes from somewhere else in stack.. Takes in a TensorExprGraph of static shapes and generalizes the input shapes to symbolic dimensions. Dimensions of value 1 will be preserved, otherwise dimensions with the same value will be bucketed to the same symbolic shape. E.g. `Tensor(5, 3), Tensor(3, 1) -> Tensor(SS(-1), SS(-2)), Tensor(SS(-2), 1)` From there, runs symbolic shape inference on the graph, and creates a versioning if in the graph with prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard checking if the inputs at runtime match the Generalized Symbolic Shapes that are inputs to the TE Kernel. The computate to calculate all symbolic dimensions is inlined in to the if block with the TE Kernel. All Sym Dim Value* are appended to the end of the TE Kernel Graph/Node inputs, and the Node is augmented with a integer list attr `symbolic_shape_inputs` that gives the mapping from Value * -> Symbolic Shape int64_t value. For more lengthy IR examples and walkthrough look at ShapeAnalysisTest.DynamicShapesFusion in `test_shape_analysis` Returns True on Success, False on Failure, can fail if shape propagation fails to propagate # of dims or if complete shapes on inputs not set. Example transformation ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` -> ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) %5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4) block0(): %15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp) %16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp) %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]() %18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10 %elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10 %elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10 %cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29 %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3) -> (%3) block1(): %14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) -> (%14) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %SS_5 : int, %SS_4 : int, %SS_3 : int, %SS_2 : int): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar, anjali411 Differential Revision: D31797466 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: b508d2f5baef6e8e4020955ab1d4bc4b9c7bdfdd
2021-10-29 00:07:44 +00:00
going to return all of the computed runtime symbolic dimensions as outputs
of the graph on guard success, and return None on guard failure
*/
// Setting up guard to return sym shapes on guard success and None on failure
Node* if_node = findNode(g, prim::If);
IfView if_v(if_node);
if_node->eraseOutput(0);
if_v.thenBlock()->eraseOutput(0);
if_v.elseBlock()->eraseOutput(0);
WithInsertPoint guard(if_node);
auto none_val = g->insertConstant(IValue());
auto sym_shapes = te_group->is(Symbol::attr("symbolic_shape_inputs"));
auto offset = te_group->inputs().size() - sym_shapes.size();
for (size_t i = 0; i < sym_shapes.size(); ++i) {
if_v.thenBlock()->insertOutput(i, te_group->inputs().at(offset + i));
if_v.elseBlock()->insertOutput(i, none_val);
if_node->insertOutput(i)->setType(OptionalType::create(IntType::get()));
}
auto new_outputs = g->createTuple(if_node->outputs())->insertAfter(if_node);
g->registerOutput(new_outputs->output());
te_group->destroy();
findNode(g, prim::FallbackGraph)->destroy();
// Testing bad inputs
auto first_inp = at::rand({2, 5});
std::vector<std::vector<at::Tensor>> second_inps = {
{at::rand({3, 4}), at::rand({1, 1})}, // sym shape mismatch
{at::rand({5, 2}).transpose(0, 1), at::rand({1, 1})}, // discontiguous
{at::zeros({2, 5}).to(at::ScalarType::Int),
at::rand({1, 1})}, // wrong dtype
{at::rand({2, 5, 1}), at::rand({1, 1})}, // wrong # dims
{at::rand({2, 5}).requires_grad_(true),
at::rand({1, 1})}, // requires grad
{at::rand({2, 5}), at::rand({1, 12})}, // concrete dim mismatch (1)
};
if (torch::cuda::is_available()) {
second_inps.push_back({at::rand({2, 5}).cuda(), at::rand({1, 1})});
}
for (const auto& last_inps : second_inps) {
// todo - reusing interpreter across iters gave error
Code code(g, "");
InterpreterState interp(code);
auto stack = createStack({at::rand({2, 5}), last_inps[0], last_inps[1]});
interp.run(stack);
TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT(pop(stack).toTuple()->elements().at(0).isNone());
}
// Test good inputs
Code code(g, "");
InterpreterState interp(code);
std::vector<at::Tensor> inps = {
at::rand({2, 5}), at::rand({4, 5}), at::rand({1, 1})};
Stack stack(inps.begin(), inps.end());
interp.run(stack);
auto tuple = pop(stack).toTuple();
TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT(tuple->elements().at(0).isInt());
// Testing that the sym shape calculation was correct
for (size_t i = 0; i < sym_shapes.size(); ++i) {
auto sym_shape = sym_shapes[i];
auto computed_value = tuple->elements().at(i).toInt();
if (sym_shape == inp1->symbolic_sizes().at(0).value()) {
ASSERT_EQ(computed_value, 2);
} else if (sym_shape == inp1->symbolic_sizes().at(1).value()) {
ASSERT_EQ(computed_value, 5);
} else if (sym_shape == inp2->symbolic_sizes().at(0).value()) {
ASSERT_EQ(computed_value, 4);
} else if (sym_shape == out->symbolic_sizes().at(0).value()) {
ASSERT_EQ(computed_value, 6);
} else {
TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT(false);
}
}
}
TEST(ShapeAnalysisTest, MovingConstantOutOfFusionGroups) {
std::shared_ptr<Graph> subgraph = std::make_shared<Graph>();
const auto graph_string = R"IR(
graph(%x.1 : Tensor):
%none : NoneType = prim::Constant()
%size1 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]()
%size10 : int = prim::Constant[value=10]()
%sizes : int[] = prim::ListConstruct(%size10, %size1)
%device : Device = prim::Constant[value="cpu"]()
%10 : Tensor = aten::ones(%sizes, %none, %none, %device, %none)
%3 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1)
%29 : Tensor = aten::mul(%3, %10)
return (%29))IR";
torch::jit::parseIR(graph_string, subgraph.get());
ConstantPropagation(subgraph);
std::shared_ptr<Graph> g = std::make_shared<Graph>();
auto x_inp = g->addInput("x_inp");
auto x_type = TensorType::create(at::rand({10, 5}));
x_inp->setType(x_type);
subgraph->inputs().at(0)->setType(x_type);
[JIT][NNC] Add handling of strides to dynamic shape support. (#70464) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/70464 Add handling of strided input tensors to dynamic fusion. This is done with the same set of input striding specializations as https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/60684/: ``` S_ONE, // STRIDE_ONE: packed S_CONT, // STRIDE_CONTIGUOUS: stride[i + 1] * sizes[i + 1] S_TRAN_CONT, // STRIDE_TRANSPOSED_CONTIGUOUS: stride[i-1] * sizes[i-1] S_AS_ARG, // STRIDE_AS_ARG: stride passed in as runtime value ``` and then two additional specializations for a) contiguous tensor and b) channels-last tensor. channels-last is a common case and we should optimize for it. additionally, tensors natively store whether they are contiguous/channels-last contiguous, which makes it faster to check if tensors follow this pattern. Output striding will be done in a follow up. The striding is stored on both the TensorGroup node and on the guard node. The striding descriptors are stored as a vector of strings on the node for debugability and to make use of storing ivalues as attributes on nodes. As an example: ``` %8 : Double(10, 11, 12, 13, strides=[1716, 1, 143, 11], requires_grad=0, device=cpu) = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-37, -36, -35, -34], striding_inputs_desc=[["TENSOR_CONT_CHANNELS_LAST"]](%x, %24, %23, %22, %21)``` ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar Differential Revision: D33458649 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: c42616d3c683d70f6258180d23d3841a31a6030d
2022-01-12 17:08:04 +00:00
subgraph->outputs().at(0)->setType(x_type);
auto output = g->insertNode(g->create(prim::TensorExprGroup))->output();
output->node()->addInput(x_inp);
output->node()->g_(attr::Subgraph, subgraph);
auto success = GenerateGuard(output->node());
TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT(success);
// Check that the constants have been moved out of the fused graph.
// This should result in not have any conditionals other than the one
// checking the result of TensorExprDynamicGuard.
testing::FileCheck()
.check("TensorExprDynamicGuard")
->check_next("prim::If")
->check_not("prim::If") // no other IFs due to constants.
->check("TensorExprGroup")
->check("block1")
->check("FallbackGraph")
->run(*g);
}
namespace {
c10::optional<int64_t> sym_dim = c10::nullopt;
// NOLINTNEXTLINE(bugprone-easily-swappable-parameters)
void assertShapeEqual(c10::SymbolicShape& a, c10::SymbolicShape& e) {
auto a_canonical = CanonicalizedSymbolicShape(a);
auto e_canonical = CanonicalizedSymbolicShape(e);
EXPECT_EQ(a_canonical, e_canonical);
}
void assertShapeEqual(
c10::optional<std::vector<c10::SymbolicShape>>& actual,
std::vector<c10::optional<int64_t>> expected) {
ASSERT_TRUE(actual.has_value());
ASSERT_EQ(actual->size(), 1);
auto symb_expected = c10::SymbolicShape(expected);
assertShapeEqual(actual->at(0), symb_expected);
}
const FunctionSchema* getSchema(const char* name) {
return &(getOperatorForLiteral(name)->schema());
}
} // namespace
TEST(ShapeAnalysisTest, SymbolicShapeAPI) {
// Figure out how to fetch a function schema
// Ask someone else how to create a function schema / operator in C++
auto schema = getSchema(
"aten::sub.Tensor(Tensor self, Tensor other, *, Scalar alpha=1) -> Tensor");
c10::IValue const_size_1 = std::vector<int64_t>{64, 56, 56};
c10::IValue const_size_2 = std::vector<int64_t>{1, 56, 56};
// Check vector initializer list syntax
c10::SymbolicShape ss_concrete =
std::vector<c10::optional<int64_t>>{1, 56, 56};
c10::SymbolicShape ss1 = std::vector<c10::optional<int64_t>>{sym_dim, 56, 56};
c10::SymbolicShape ss2 =
std::vector<c10::optional<int64_t>>{64, sym_dim, sym_dim};
c10::SymbolicShape ss3 =
std::vector<c10::optional<int64_t>>{sym_dim, sym_dim, sym_dim, sym_dim};
auto res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(
schema, std::vector<SSAInput>{const_size_1, const_size_1});
assertShapeEqual(res, {64, 56, 56});
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(
schema, std::vector<SSAInput>{const_size_1, const_size_2});
assertShapeEqual(res, {64, 56, 56});
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(
schema, std::vector<SSAInput>{const_size_1, ss1});
assertShapeEqual(res, {64, 56, 56});
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(
schema, std::vector<SSAInput>{const_size_2, ss1});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 56, 56});
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(
schema, std::vector<SSAInput>{ss_concrete, ss2});
assertShapeEqual(res, {64, 56, 56});
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, std::vector<SSAInput>{ss2, ss3});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 64, sym_dim, sym_dim});
}
TEST(ShapeAnalysisTest, BoundedSymbolicShapes) {
auto schema = getSchema("aten::nonzero(Tensor self) -> (Tensor)");
// Test that we generate symbolic shapes for the output of a nonzero op
c10::IValue const_size_1 = std::vector<int64_t>{5, 10};
auto res =
calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, std::vector<SSAInput>{const_size_1});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 2});
// Test that nonzero can also create concrete shapes
c10::IValue const_size_2 = std::vector<int64_t>({1, 0});
res =
calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, std::vector<SSAInput>{const_size_2});
assertShapeEqual(res, {0, 2});
}
TEST(ShapeAnalysisTest, SymbolicShapeCaching) {
clear_shape_cache();
auto schema = getSchema("aten::mm(Tensor self, Tensor mat2) -> Tensor");
c10::IValue const_size_1 = std::vector<int64_t>{64, 56};
c10::IValue const_size_2 = std::vector<int64_t>{64, 56};
c10::IValue const_size_3 = std::vector<int64_t>{64, 20};
c10::SymbolicShape ss1 = c10::SymbolicShape({sym_dim, 64});
c10::SymbolicShape ss2 = c10::SymbolicShape({sym_dim, 64});
c10::SymbolicShape ss3 = c10::SymbolicShape({sym_dim, sym_dim});
auto res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, {ss1, const_size_1});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 56});
auto res1_val = res->at(0);
// The exact same arguments should return the exact same result
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, {ss1, const_size_1});
auto res2_val = res->at(0);
EXPECT_EQ(res1_val, res2_val);
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 1);
// Same shape but different symbols should return same shape
// but different symbolic indicies
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, {ss2, const_size_2});
auto res3_val = res->at(0);
assertShapeEqual(res3_val, res2_val);
EXPECT_NE(res3_val, res2_val);
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 1);
// Different concrete shape should be cached separately
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, {ss1, const_size_3});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 20});
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 2);
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, {ss3, const_size_3});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 20});
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 3);
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(schema, {ss3, ss3});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, sym_dim});
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 4);
}
TEST(ShapeAnalysisTest, ShapeCacheMultipleFns) {
clear_shape_cache();
auto squeeze_op =
getSchema("aten::squeeze.dim(Tensor(a) self, int dim) -> Tensor(a)");
auto mul_tensor =
getSchema("aten::mul.Tensor(Tensor self, Tensor other) -> Tensor");
auto mul_scalar =
getSchema("aten::mul.Scalar(Tensor self, Scalar other) -> Tensor");
auto div_tensor =
getSchema("aten::div.Tensor(Tensor self, Tensor other) -> Tensor");
auto matmul = getSchema("aten::mm(Tensor self, Tensor mat2) -> Tensor");
c10::IValue const_int = 1;
c10::SymbolicShape ss1 = c10::SymbolicShape({sym_dim, 64});
auto res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(squeeze_op, {ss1, const_int});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 64});
// Show that cache can handle multiple functions
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(mul_scalar, {ss1, const_int});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 64});
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 2);
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(mul_tensor, {ss1, ss1});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 64});
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 3);
// Even when the expected outcome is the same, should not collide
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(div_tensor, {ss1, ss1});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 64});
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 4);
// Don't lose cached objects
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(mul_scalar, {ss1, const_int});
assertShapeEqual(res, {sym_dim, 64});
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 4);
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(matmul, {ss1, ss1});
// SSA can infer that sym_dim is 64 as both tensors
// use the same sym_dim
assertShapeEqual(res, {64, 64});
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 5);
}
TEST(ShapeAnalysisTest, TestShapeMultipleReturns) {
clear_shape_cache();
auto max_dim_op = getSchema(
"aten::max.dim(Tensor self, int dim, bool keepdim=False) -> (Tensor values, Tensor indices)");
c10::IValue const_int = 1;
c10::IValue false_ival = false;
c10::SymbolicShape ss1 = c10::SymbolicShape({sym_dim, 64});
c10::SymbolicShape ss2 = c10::SymbolicShape({sym_dim, 64});
auto res =
calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(max_dim_op, {ss1, const_int, false_ival});
c10::SymbolicShape expected_res = c10::SymbolicShape({sym_dim});
assertShapeEqual(res->at(0), expected_res);
// res0 and res1 should share the same symbolic symbol
EXPECT_EQ(res->at(0), res->at(1));
// Also test that the shape cache also returns consistent result shapes
res = calculateSymbolicShapesOnOp(max_dim_op, {ss2, const_int, false_ival});
assertShapeEqual(res->at(0), expected_res);
EXPECT_EQ(res->at(0), res->at(1));
EXPECT_EQ(get_shape_cache_size(), 1);
}
Add Initial NNC Dynamic Shapes Flow (#66136) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/66136 FOR REVIEWERS: this is ready to review, test failures comes from somewhere else in stack.. Takes in a TensorExprGraph of static shapes and generalizes the input shapes to symbolic dimensions. Dimensions of value 1 will be preserved, otherwise dimensions with the same value will be bucketed to the same symbolic shape. E.g. `Tensor(5, 3), Tensor(3, 1) -> Tensor(SS(-1), SS(-2)), Tensor(SS(-2), 1)` From there, runs symbolic shape inference on the graph, and creates a versioning if in the graph with prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard checking if the inputs at runtime match the Generalized Symbolic Shapes that are inputs to the TE Kernel. The computate to calculate all symbolic dimensions is inlined in to the if block with the TE Kernel. All Sym Dim Value* are appended to the end of the TE Kernel Graph/Node inputs, and the Node is augmented with a integer list attr `symbolic_shape_inputs` that gives the mapping from Value * -> Symbolic Shape int64_t value. For more lengthy IR examples and walkthrough look at ShapeAnalysisTest.DynamicShapesFusion in `test_shape_analysis` Returns True on Success, False on Failure, can fail if shape propagation fails to propagate # of dims or if complete shapes on inputs not set. Example transformation ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` -> ``` graph(%x_inp : Float(10, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y_inp : Float(4, 5, strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z_inp : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)): %4 : bool = prim::TensorExprDynamicGuard[types=[Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu)]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) %5 : Tensor = prim::If(%4) block0(): %15 : int[] = aten::size(%x_inp) %16 : int[] = aten::size(%y_inp) %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]() %18 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %elem.3 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %18) # <string>:40:10 %elem.5 : int = aten::__getitem__(%15, %17) # <string>:40:10 %elem.11 : int = aten::__getitem__(%16, %18) # <string>:40:10 %cat_dim_size.48 : int = aten::add(%elem.3, %elem.11) # <string>:321:29 %3 : Tensor = prim::TensorExprGroup_0[symbolic_shape_inputs=[-5, -4, -3, -2]](%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp, %cat_dim_size.48, %elem.11, %elem.5, %elem.3) -> (%3) block1(): %14 : Tensor = prim::FallbackGraph_1(%x_inp, %y_inp, %z_inp) -> (%14) return () with prim::TensorExprGroup_0 = graph(%x.1 : Float(SS(-2), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %y.1 : Float(SS(-4), SS(-3), strides=[5, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %z : Float(1, 1, strides=[1, 1], requires_grad=0, device=cpu), %SS_5 : int, %SS_4 : int, %SS_3 : int, %SS_2 : int): %3 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]() %4 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::tanh(%x.1) %5 : Tensor(SS(-2), SS(-3)) = aten::erf(%4) %6 : Tensor(SS(-4), SS(-3)) = aten::relu(%y.1) %7 : Tensor[] = prim::ListConstruct(%5, %6) %8 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::cat(%7, %3) %9 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::hardswish(%8) %10 : Tensor(SS(-5), SS(-3)) = aten::mul(%9, %z) return (%9) ``` Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: navahgar, anjali411 Differential Revision: D31797466 Pulled By: eellison fbshipit-source-id: b508d2f5baef6e8e4020955ab1d4bc4b9c7bdfdd
2021-10-29 00:07:44 +00:00
} // namespace jit
} // namespace torch