proof-aware-crypto-tooling-.../paper
mrwulf f8de7d9e6f paper v0.9: round-15 final patch — the frozen submission candidate
Round-15 reconciliation: both reviewers ran the mandated rendered-PDF
gate (all 22 pages each, acts stated). They CONFLICTED on one checkable
fact: GPT found the transport figure's s label on the wrong node (the
computed [4,8) parent instead of the consumed [6,8) proof value); the
Fable reviewer certified 'dashed consumed s over [6,8)'. Adjudicated
against the tikz source: GPT RIGHT — my drawing contradicted its own
caption; Fable's script verified the instance's mathematics but misread
the label placement. Fixed (s -> p67 dashed; q47 -> plain computed
node) and CONFIRMED BY RE-RENDER.

GPT's second blocker also real and fixed: Definition 2(i) claimed
'unique accepted opening' (witness uniqueness) where Game PB proves
leaf-value binding — clause (i) now 'an authentic signed view and a
uniquely determined leaf value at its claimed position'; Appendix A row
aligned ('authentic opening with a position-bound leaf value').

Layout (all confirmed by rendered inspection): figure relocated after
the transport introduction (no longer floats between Theorem 4's
statement and proof); Lemma 4's full statement held together
(samepage); Appendix C given its own page — heading + scope warning +
complete code + Appendix D on p23 (clearpage; 22 -> 23 pages).

GPT optionals adopted: abstract 'one project-specific uninterpreted
SHA-256 boundary axiom'; adaptive-oracle sentence defining Q; corollary
overhead phrasing; PB-vs-mirror bridge sentence in the mapping
paragraph; 'bespoke bar' lead-in dropped; Table 1 ragged-right columns.
Declined with reasons recorded: Lemma-4 sub-case itemization and
renaming the composition theorem (both reviewers' optional-only notes;
churn risk at the frozen gate outweighs gain).

Gate status by the reviewers' own words: Fable round 15 'nothing
blocks' x3 with full evidence discipline; GPT 'after the two
correctness fixes and the three layout fixes ... nothing blocks
submission on correctness or readability grounds' — all five applied
and render-verified. 0 overfull, suite 115 green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-17 22:20:42 +02:00
..
.gitignore The LTL paper: 4-page arXiv draft, claim-disciplined 2026-07-06 18:14:38 +02:00
ltl-v0.1.pdf paper v2 canonical + versioned hosting; pin-store proposition now true 2026-07-09 18:02:59 +02:00
ltl-v0.1.tex paper v2 canonical + versioned hosting; pin-store proposition now true 2026-07-09 18:02:59 +02:00
ltl-v0.2.pdf paper v0.3: the reinvention — accountable distribution of machine-checked evidence 2026-07-17 09:39:04 +02:00
ltl-v0.2.tex paper v0.3: the reinvention — accountable distribution of machine-checked evidence 2026-07-17 09:39:04 +02:00
ltl.pdf paper v0.9: round-15 final patch — the frozen submission candidate 2026-07-17 22:20:42 +02:00
ltl.tex paper v0.9: round-15 final patch — the frozen submission candidate 2026-07-17 22:20:42 +02:00
reinvention-outline.md paper: reinvention outline (post second ePrint rejection) 2026-07-16 19:09:29 +02:00