mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/proof-aware-crypto-tooling-agent.git
synced 2026-09-03 19:53:43 +00:00
Re-auditing the prior (Opus-produced) depth pass adversarially found and fixed three genuine issues: 1. OVERCLAIM (serious): §5.3 said the consistency verifier was differential-tested 'on all (n0,n1) with n1<=256' but the script only SAMPLED sizes (5,508 cases). Ran the genuinely exhaustive test — all 1<=n0<=n1<=256, honest + 4 mutations — 164,224 invocations, and the inclusion verifier likewise (164,479). Paper now states the true scope and counts; both are pinned in a new CI test (test_paper_verifiers.py, 104 tests) so the numbers cannot rot. 2. PROOF IMPRECISION: Lemma 2 (Root binding) was applied to ConsRec's first component, which PASSES THROUGH (no hnode) at some levels and so is not the hash-fold the lemma needs. Reworked: Lemma 2 now defined over 'hash-folds' only; Theorem 3 restructured into 3 clean steps that put only the full-hashing second component through the lemma, then argue algebraically + one honest-tree collision. Also hoisted Lemma 2 above Theorem 2 and made Theorem 2 invoke it (was inlined), so the 'two theorems share the lemma' remark is now true; deduped the remark. 3. MISLABELED TABLE: Table 1's 'files vs upstream' column actually held line-diffs against different baselines. Dropped it for clean comparable columns (files / apex axioms / SHA-512 shape); the diff story stays in the portability paragraph where each baseline is named. 17 pages, all refs resolve, 104 tests green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
142 lines
4.2 KiB
Python
142 lines
4.2 KiB
Python
"""The paper (ltl.tex, §5.3, App. B) claims the *recursive* inclusion and
|
|
consistency verifiers it defines and proves about are equivalent to the
|
|
deployed iterative RFC 9162 verifiers, and cites exhaustive
|
|
differential-testing counts. This test IS that verification, so the paper's
|
|
numbers cannot silently rot: it reproduces the exact recursive forms
|
|
written in the paper and asserts full agreement with the deployed code over
|
|
all sizes up to 256, honest inputs plus adversarial mutations, and pins the
|
|
cited case counts (164,479 inclusion; 164,224 consistency).
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
import hashlib
|
|
|
|
from pacta.transparency import (
|
|
consistency_proof,
|
|
inclusion_proof,
|
|
merkle_root,
|
|
verify_consistency,
|
|
verify_inclusion,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
NMAX = 256
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _h(b: bytes) -> bytes:
|
|
return hashlib.sha256(b).digest()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _hleaf(d: bytes) -> bytes:
|
|
return _h(b"\x00" + d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _hnode(x: bytes, y: bytes) -> bytes:
|
|
return _h(b"\x01" + x + y)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _k_below(n: int) -> int:
|
|
k = 1
|
|
while 2 * k < n:
|
|
k *= 2
|
|
return k
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the paper's recursive inclusion verifier (App. B) ---------------------
|
|
def _root(v, m, n, path):
|
|
if n == 1:
|
|
if path:
|
|
raise ValueError
|
|
return v
|
|
if not path:
|
|
raise ValueError
|
|
*rest, s = path
|
|
k = _k_below(n)
|
|
return _hnode(_root(v, m, k, rest), s) if m < k else _hnode(s, _root(v, m - k, n - k, rest))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _paper_incl(d, m, n, path, root):
|
|
if not (0 <= m < n):
|
|
return False
|
|
try:
|
|
return _root(_hleaf(d), m, n, path) == root
|
|
except ValueError:
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the paper's recursive consistency verifier (§5.3, ConsRec) ------------
|
|
def _consrec(m, n, P, b, r0):
|
|
if m == n:
|
|
if b:
|
|
if P:
|
|
raise ValueError
|
|
return (r0, r0)
|
|
if len(P) != 1:
|
|
raise ValueError
|
|
return (P[0], P[0])
|
|
if not P:
|
|
raise ValueError
|
|
*rest, s = P
|
|
k = _k_below(n)
|
|
if m <= k:
|
|
x, y = _consrec(m, k, rest, b, r0)
|
|
return (x, _hnode(y, s))
|
|
xr, yr = _consrec(m - k, n - k, rest, False, r0)
|
|
return (_hnode(s, xr), _hnode(s, yr))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _paper_cons(m, n, r0, r1, P):
|
|
if m == 0:
|
|
return True
|
|
if m > n:
|
|
return False
|
|
try:
|
|
x, y = _consrec(m, n, P, True, r0)
|
|
except ValueError:
|
|
return False
|
|
return x == r0 and y == r1
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_recursive_inclusion_equals_deployed_exhaustive():
|
|
total = 0
|
|
for n in range(1, NMAX + 1):
|
|
data = [bytes([i % 251]) + bytes([(i * 5) % 256]) * (i % 3) for i in range(n)]
|
|
root = merkle_root(data)
|
|
for m in range(n):
|
|
P = inclusion_proof(data, m)
|
|
cases = [
|
|
(data[m], m, n, P, root),
|
|
(data[m] + b"!", m, n, P, root),
|
|
(data[m], (m + 1) % n, n, P, root),
|
|
(data[m], m, n, P, _h(b"q")),
|
|
]
|
|
if P:
|
|
cases.append((data[m], m, n, P[:-1], root))
|
|
for d2, m2, n2, P2, r2 in cases:
|
|
total += 1
|
|
assert verify_inclusion(d2, m2, n2, P2, r2) == _paper_incl(d2, m2, n2, P2, r2), (n, m)
|
|
assert verify_inclusion(data[m], m, n, P, root)
|
|
assert _paper_incl(data[m], m, n, P, root)
|
|
assert total == 164_479, total # the count cited in the paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_recursive_consistency_equals_deployed_exhaustive():
|
|
total = 0
|
|
for n in range(1, NMAX + 1):
|
|
data = [bytes([i % 251]) + bytes([(i * 7) % 256]) * (i % 4) for i in range(n)]
|
|
r1 = merkle_root(data)
|
|
for m in range(1, n + 1):
|
|
P = consistency_proof(data, m)
|
|
r0 = merkle_root(data[:m])
|
|
cases = [
|
|
(m, n, r0, r1, P),
|
|
(m, n, _h(b"x"), r1, P),
|
|
(m, n, r0, _h(b"y"), P),
|
|
(m, n, r0, r1, P + [_h(b"z")]),
|
|
]
|
|
if P:
|
|
cases.append((m, n, r0, r1, P[:-1]))
|
|
for mm, nn, a, bb, pp in cases:
|
|
total += 1
|
|
assert verify_consistency(mm, nn, a, bb, pp) == _paper_cons(mm, nn, a, bb, pp), (n, m)
|
|
assert verify_consistency(m, n, r0, r1, P)
|
|
assert _paper_cons(m, n, r0, r1, P)
|
|
assert total == 164_224, total # the count cited in the paper
|