Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
71c670527c REAL EVIDENCE: guarded replay of all four repos, attested, logged, dogfooded
The provider ran its full honest replay against the four verified
repositories on this machine - every Lean compile and axiom audit routed
through lean-guard (memory-capped, core-pinned, single-flight, ~30 min
per fork) - and the results are now shipped under evidence/:

- 16/16 certificates proven per fork, every axiom cone boundary-exact
  (the four apex tiers carry their fork's documented SHA-512/wire
  boundary axiom-for-axiom), each attestation pinned to the exact repo
  commit (dalek 8ded7bc, anza 673c15e, risc0 98a13a6, betrusted
  81f614a) and Ed25519-signed.
- All four appended to the persistent transparency log. The log holds
  EIGHT leaves: the first four are the initial run's attestations,
  which honestly recorded an AUDIT FAILURE (the two pacta bugs fixed in
  e87f0e8) - an append-only trust ledger keeps its bad day, and the
  fixed run's leaves sit beside it.
- Every receipt re-verified through the FULL stack: dogfood verifier
  (backend verified-dalek-serial recorded), STH pin store, freshness
  policy. Receipts are freshly issued against the final tree (a stale
  mid-run receipt tripped the pin store's rollback defense exactly as
  designed; the rollback diagnostic now hints at idempotent re-issue).
- The capstone consequence ran for real: pacta agent with trusted
  provider + signature via the proven path + required receipt + pin
  store + --require-verified-verifier built the R4-gated library
  capsule from ATTESTED evidence (no local Lean replay needed by the
  consuming agent).

Docs and teaching updated against the real artifacts: evidence/README
(inventory + re-verify instructions), README "Real Evidence" section,
lecture 5 now re-derives 16/16 verdicts from the REAL dalek attestation
(signature checked on the proven path, provider labels ignored), and
lecture 6 verifies all four REAL receipts and walks a fresh pin store
over them. Every changed notebook cell executed before commit. 49/49
tests green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-06 14:54:48 +02:00
4a37da8fd9 Curriculum: the ratchet rule, the four-tier reality, and lecture 9 (dogfood)
The notebooks now carry the same didactic contract as the companion book
(the "ratchet rule", stated in the course map): every load-bearing idea
runs twice - napkin scale, then real scale - and every pair is EXECUTABLE
in the notebook, not narrated.

- Lecture 1: the truth boundary updated to the proven four-tier apex,
  with the what-is-still-NOT-proven list (SHA-512, parsers, signing,
  wallets) given equal weight.
- Lecture 2: napkin/real scoring pair - a two-certificate toy card
  scored in your head, then the shipped sixteen-certificate R4 fixture
  through the same function, residual blockers and per-tier boundary
  axioms printed.
- Lecture 6: new split-view section. A runnable equivocation drill:
  pin a two-leaf view, grow it honestly with a consistency proof, then
  present a forged same-size root and watch the pin store name the
  attack. Real-scale pointers to --sth-store, log-consistency,
  log-audit, and the freshness policy; a new exercise asks students to
  construct the lie a size-only anchor check would miss.
- Lecture 7: the wallet gate now swings BOTH ways on real evidence -
  a partial card denied at R3, the shipped R4 card allowed - both
  runnable.
- Lecture 8 capstone: "design R4" became "audit R4": read the shipped
  card like an auditor, then design the R5 discharge plan (parser
  specs, verified SHA-512, signing-side, per-fork production-path
  mapping).
- NEW Lecture 9, "Eat Your Own Dogfood": the honest coverage ledger of
  the proven-path verifier; a napkin PEM decode (the fixed 12-byte
  Ed25519 SPKI prefix, read with your eyes) paired with the mechanical
  extraction; live backend dispatch; the fail-closed
  --require-verified-verifier policy; and the hybrid-PQC section -
  proven-classical Ed25519 plus a required-but-honest ML-DSA slot
  ("blockers get fixed; placeholders get trusted").

Every code cell of the changed notebooks was executed end-to-end before
committing (outputs stripped per house rules). 49/49 tests green with
the notebook inventory updated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-06 10:18:06 +02:00
caa864a749 Estate sync: boundary-axiom vocabulary + the four-tier apex reality (R4)
The verified corpus completed its phase 2 on 2026-07-06: every ed25519
fork now carries FOUR button-enforced apex tiers up to the full lift
(accept <=> decompress(R) = [k](-A)+[s]B as points), the complete scalar
layer, and the constructive encoding/decoding chain. pacta was calibrated
to the pre-apex corpus and - worse - had no vocabulary for
boundary-audited certificates: its axiom audit knew only "clean = exactly
the three standard axioms", so the apex tiers would have scored dirty.

New vocabulary:
- Profile.certificate_axioms: per-certificate ALLOWED axiom sets;
  expected_axioms_for(cert) resolves each certificate's own boundary.
- RepoConfig.apex_boundary: a simple per-fork key (dalek-wrappers /
  hash3 / anza) expanded by the ed25519 profile into the exact
  per-tier allowed sets. AUTHORITY NOTE in profiles/ed25519.py: each
  repo's check.sh Phase 3b is the enforcement point; if the button and
  this table disagree, the button wins.
- run_axiom_audit compares each certificate against ITS allowed set;
  deviation in EITHER direction (extra axiom or missing boundary
  axiom) is dirty.

New risk reality:
- R4 is now reachable: full four-tier apex + constructive chain +
  scalar arithmetic, all proven with cones pinned to their documented
  boundaries. R4 always carries explicit residual blockers (SHA-512
  oracle, hypothesis-parametric wire parses, translation faithfulness,
  no side-channel/build assurance - those gate R5).
- R3 unchanged (arithmetic pair) and now explains exactly which apex
  certificates are missing for R4.

Attestation trust model hardened:
- The provider is trusted for its OBSERVATION, never its VERDICT:
  axiom_status is re-derived locally from observed_axioms against the
  agent's own boundary policy. A provider that labels a dirty cone
  "clean" gains nothing; "proven" with no observed axioms is
  "unverifiable".
- Partial attestations degrade instead of being rejected: uncovered
  certificates stay unproven and the score caps accordingly (an
  arithmetic-only attestation still authorizes an R3 library capsule,
  never a wallet).

Also: scripts/mini_pytest.py - a dependency-free test runner (tmp_path,
raises, monkeypatch, capsys) for hosts without pytest; examples
regenerated FROM the tool (dalek/anza fixtures now R4, 16 certs; new
full four-tier attestation example); tests updated + new
tests/test_boundaries.py (lying-provider, missing-boundary-axiom,
partial-coverage cases). 40/40 tests green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-06 10:04:43 +02:00
5da353b31e add proof-aware crypto curriculum notebooks 2026-07-03 14:42:59 +02:00