The review process concluded 2026-08 (operator released the hold). Folds
in exactly the staged erratum-queue + v0.10 items, nothing else:
- corpus count sentence made historical (sixteen at the studied leaves;
forty-four per fork since — the log records both generations)
- the 3,867/73,573 divergence finding gains its closure everywhere it
appears: root cause = deployed verifier omitted RFC 9162 S2.1.4.2
Step 7's terminal sn=0 condition (fixed in ddbb5a4); zero divergences
post-fix, three-way regression
- new limitations paragraph 'Replay-harness integrity' (a wrong
observation needs no malice)
- adversary model: defective-harness clause
- claim matrix: 'recorded cone was produced by an audit that performed
its checks — not established' row
- title page carries 'Revised: August 2026'; submitted v0.9 (7f140356)
preserved in git history; paper/README signpost updated
paper/README.md tells a visitor that ltl.pdf is the submitted version
frozen during review, that v0.1/v0.2 are superseded history, and that
v0.3-v0.9 live in git history. Also corrects the stale web.py comment
that labeled the live pdf 'v0.3 reinvention' (it is the v0.9 submitted
version). No served bytes change; the comment fix reaches the droplet
with the next routine app update.
