mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/proof-aware-crypto-tooling-agent.git
synced 2026-09-04 20:03:40 +00:00
paper v0.3: anonymize the external-consumer study (operator review)
Naming a specific third-party system on the strength of a family-level dependency observation, with no engagement and no receipt code, reads as arbitrary and could imply a relationship that does not exist. The sentence's actual content — attestations are version-exact; a family-level match confers nothing — needs no name and keeps it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e716c24698
commit
2f24a0b96c
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
BIN
paper/ltl.pdf
BIN
paper/ltl.pdf
Binary file not shown.
|
|
@ -766,10 +766,10 @@ mechanized in the present corpus.
|
|||
The deployed internal consumer is a quorum-custody signing service: its
|
||||
inbound boundary accepts a log-derived statement only when independently
|
||||
attested verifier backends agree, and its policy consumes recorded
|
||||
observations, never operator labels. A prospective external case study
|
||||
examined the Swiss Post e-voting system, whose vendored Ed25519 dependency
|
||||
matches an attested subject at family level but not at the attested version.
|
||||
The model treats that as a useful negative: attestations are version-exact by
|
||||
observations, never operator labels. A prospective external study
|
||||
examined a production codebase whose vendored Ed25519 dependency matches an
|
||||
attested subject at family level but not at the attested version. The model
|
||||
treats that as a useful negative: attestations are version-exact by
|
||||
construction, and a family-level match confers nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Proof portability across forks}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue