saymrwulf/proof-aware-crypto-tooling-agent
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/saymrwulf/proof-aware-crypto-tooling-agent.git synced 2026-09-03 19:53:43 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
proof-aware-crypto-tooling-.../paper/README.md

32 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

paper folder: signpost which file is current (operator decision 2026-08-08: keep drafts + note) paper/README.md tells a visitor that ltl.pdf is the submitted version frozen during review, that v0.1/v0.2 are superseded history, and that v0.3-v0.9 live in git history. Also corrects the stale web.py comment that labeled the live pdf 'v0.3 reinvention' (it is the v0.9 submitted version). No served bytes change; the comment fix reaches the droplet with the next routine app update.
2026-08-08 16:44:13 +00:00
# Which file is current?
paper v0.15: the dichotomy named, the question aligned Two edits. (1) The alternatives paragraph of section 1 now states the frame the site opens with, in paper register: each alternative fails on one of two sides — checking cost stays with the consumer, or it disappears because belief in a label is demanded — and the primitive studied occupies the point between. (2) The introduction's italic question said 'opaque provider verdict' where the abstract says 'label'; aligned to label, consistent with the v0.13 verdict/label separation. Gate green, 25pp, page 2 eye-checked.
2026-08-17 11:40:39 +00:00
**`ltl.pdf` / `ltl.tex` — the current paper (v0.15, revised August 2026).**
paper v0.11: the paper catches up to the system it built The freeze rationale is gone (review concluded); v0.11 describes the LIVE deployment instead of the July snapshot: - abstract + contributions: nineteen leaves, four Ed25519 corpora at 44 certs, the accumulator's two attestations, leaf 18 = the SLH-DSA verify path; heads dual-signed since size 14 with the parameter set the log itself attests - signed-tree-heads section: the additive deterministic SLH-DSA co-signature, ABSENT-not-failed history honesty, determinism as an audit primitive, the closed loop to leaf 18 - new instantiation subsection 'The SLH-DSA verify path: the method on second terrain': 11 certificates, acceptance characterization, the no-second-semantics honesty (visible-not-correct), exact cone enforcement, scope (mono facade + 137-case bridge, base_2b, no signing) - deployment/public state: 15 August 2026, root 7ee23940, twelve heads 8-19, per-leaf narrative through 18 - NEW Appendix E: the eleven SLH-DSA certificates with their exact oracle cones — the mirror of Appendix D's Ed25519 tiers - title: v0.11; site card + snapshot note + paper/README updated 25pp, zero unresolved refs, Appendix E render-inspected by eye; full test suite green
2026-08-16 11:14:57 +00:00
The review process concluded in August 2026. v0.10 folded in the
corrections queued during the freeze (the closed consistency-verifier
divergence with its `sn = 0` root cause, replay-harness-integrity
paper v0.12 + estate: one numbering, everywhere — 0-based leaf indices Operator order: the leaf-index convention adopted this morning must be global. Paper1 now says leaf 12 in every place that said entry 13 (intro, contributions, section 7.2, related work, conclusion, artifact availability, Appendix B retitled 'Deployed leaf-12 scope'); the ordinal 'thirteenth entry' survives only as a gloss. v0.12, 25pp, gate green, Appendix B page eye-checked. Site card follows (v0.12; revision prose de-versioned so it cannot churn), paper/README history extended, top README says leaf 12/17/18. reinvention-outline moved to the private control repo earlier this commit-series (moat doctrine).
2026-08-16 18:04:44 +00:00
limitation, claim-matrix row); v0.11 brought the paper up to the live
paper v0.11: the paper catches up to the system it built The freeze rationale is gone (review concluded); v0.11 describes the LIVE deployment instead of the July snapshot: - abstract + contributions: nineteen leaves, four Ed25519 corpora at 44 certs, the accumulator's two attestations, leaf 18 = the SLH-DSA verify path; heads dual-signed since size 14 with the parameter set the log itself attests - signed-tree-heads section: the additive deterministic SLH-DSA co-signature, ABSENT-not-failed history honesty, determinism as an audit primitive, the closed loop to leaf 18 - new instantiation subsection 'The SLH-DSA verify path: the method on second terrain': 11 certificates, acceptance characterization, the no-second-semantics honesty (visible-not-correct), exact cone enforcement, scope (mono facade + 137-case bridge, base_2b, no signing) - deployment/public state: 15 August 2026, root 7ee23940, twelve heads 8-19, per-leaf narrative through 18 - NEW Appendix E: the eleven SLH-DSA certificates with their exact oracle cones — the mirror of Appendix D's Ed25519 tiers - title: v0.11; site card + snapshot note + paper/README updated 25pp, zero unresolved refs, Appendix E render-inspected by eye; full test suite green
2026-08-16 11:14:57 +00:00
system: the nineteen-leaf dual-signed deployment, the SLH-DSA (FIPS 205)
paper v0.13: the Green-persona approachability revision A referee persona (deep crypto, shallow Lean, no prior drafts) read the whole paper; all findings applied, ~40 edits, none touching technical content: - house terms defined at first use: certificate (in contributions), accumulator (= the log's Merkle tree + verifiers), signed view (4.2), pin rule/pin-store (named at their definition, 4.3), axiom cone as the one canonical synonym, loop-fidelity glossed, facade tied to its entry point, scope block named in 3.1, oracles marked 'uninterpreted function symbols, not random oracles' - operator 'verdict' renamed label everywhere (Verdict stays the consumer algorithm); fork disambiguated (codebases vs fork evidence) - notation: declarations T_i -> Theta_i (tier collision), HIST chain k kept but challenge scalar -> c and signature bytes -> R-bar (k/r_1 overloads resolved); tiers T1-T4 introduced in 6.1 body - theorem-statement sensitivity: Thm 8 scoped to the recursive verifiers in the STATEMENT; Prop 1's 'exhibited' made conditional with pointer; Thm 3 carries its honest-pin note; Def 2(iii) gets the forgery caveat; Lemma 5 declared a restatement of Prop 2 - ghost references resolved (whole-tree root binding stated in place, twice); revision residue purged (Post-submission -> Subsequently closed; tense unified; hardened state, guarded replay, KNOWN-GAPS explained); 6.2 retitled 'A second instantiation' - six triple-read sentences rewritten per referee (them-sentence, vacuous->trivially-by-counting with real non-vacuity guard wording, pin supplier, physical-execution antecedent, bridges-land, App E factorization) - appendices A-D now each cited from the body; App D states its shared opaque boundary; FIPS 205 added to the bibliography [23] and cited - abstract divergence sentence rewritten (divergence not 'boundary', past tense, closure named, 'the corresponding log entry') Gate green: v0.13, 25pp; pages 1/16/25 eye-checked; suite 156.
2026-08-17 09:53:40 +00:00
verify-path instantiation, and its certificate appendix; v0.12 unified
entry numbering on 0-based leaf indices; v0.13 is the approachability
revision from an external-persona referee pass (house terms defined at
first use, theorem statements carry their own scoping, notation
paper v0.14: the full-document eye pass completes the referee round Operator order: every page of the PUBLISHED PDF inspected by eye, all 25. The flip surfaced two referee items the v0.13 batch had missed: (1) the notation summary lacked rows for the consistency proof C and the flag b (both load-bearing from Theorem 3 through Lemma 4) — added, with Ext pointing at its defining subsection; the gate rejected the first, too-wide row (130pt overfull) and the shortened one passed; (2) the HIST chain length still shared the letter k with the Merkle split point on facing pages — renamed to ell through the game, Theorem 5, its proof, and Theorem 8's cost term. Gate green: v0.14, 25pp; pages 8 and 13 re-eyed; suite 156.
2026-08-17 10:54:08 +00:00
collisions resolved, FIPS 205 reference added); v0.14 completes that pass after a
full-document eye inspection of the published PDF (notation-table rows
paper v0.15: the dichotomy named, the question aligned Two edits. (1) The alternatives paragraph of section 1 now states the frame the site opens with, in paper register: each alternative fails on one of two sides — checking cost stays with the consumer, or it disappears because belief in a label is demanded — and the primitive studied occupies the point between. (2) The introduction's italic question said 'opaque provider verdict' where the abstract says 'label'; aligned to label, consistent with the v0.13 verdict/label separation. Gate green, 25pp, page 2 eye-checked.
2026-08-17 11:40:39 +00:00
for C and b, HIST chain length renamed to avoid the split-point k); v0.15 names the
two-sided dilemma explicitly in the introduction and aligns the
introduction's question with the abstract (label, not verdict). The
paper v0.10: post-review revision — the freeze is over, the queue ships The review process concluded 2026-08 (operator released the hold). Folds in exactly the staged erratum-queue + v0.10 items, nothing else: - corpus count sentence made historical (sixteen at the studied leaves; forty-four per fork since — the log records both generations) - the 3,867/73,573 divergence finding gains its closure everywhere it appears: root cause = deployed verifier omitted RFC 9162 S2.1.4.2 Step 7's terminal sn=0 condition (fixed in ddbb5a4); zero divergences post-fix, three-way regression - new limitations paragraph 'Replay-harness integrity' (a wrong observation needs no malice) - adversary model: defective-harness clause - claim matrix: 'recorded cone was produced by an audit that performed its checks — not established' row - title page carries 'Revised: August 2026'; submitted v0.9 (7f140356) preserved in git history; paper/README signpost updated
2026-08-15 12:17:03 +00:00
version submitted for review (July 17, 2026, sha256 `7f140356…`) is
preserved unchanged in this repository's git history. The live copy at
the paper has a DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22057482 (Zenodo, CC BY 4.0) — site card and paper README carry it
2026-08-22 12:51:55 +00:00
<https://ltl.zkdefi.org/paper> serves the current revision; the v0.15
revision is archived with DOI
[10.5281/zenodo.22057482](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22057482)
(CC BY 4.0).
paper folder: signpost which file is current (operator decision 2026-08-08: keep drafts + note) paper/README.md tells a visitor that ltl.pdf is the submitted version frozen during review, that v0.1/v0.2 are superseded history, and that v0.3-v0.9 live in git history. Also corrects the stale web.py comment that labeled the live pdf 'v0.3 reinvention' (it is the v0.9 submitted version). No served bytes change; the comment fix reaches the droplet with the next routine app update.
2026-08-08 16:44:13 +00:00
site QA sweep: the paper section tells today's truth, old drafts retired Operator finding 2026-08-15: the live site still said 'v0.9 — frozen while under journal review' and advertised the superseded v0.1/v0.2 drafts. Fixed at the source: - webdocs.py paper card: v0.10, revised August 2026 (version now also printed on the PDF title page); the divergence description gains its closure (the sn=0 conjunct, zero divergences, three-way regression); the freeze-era reconciliation card shrunk to a tight snapshot-vs-today paragraph; fragile '12 Jupyter lectures' count dropped - web.py: /paper serves the current paper only; all old-variant routes 404 (git history retains the drafts); ltl-v0.1/v0.2 files removed from the working tree, paper/README updated - ltl.tex: title page now reads 'Revised: August 2026 — v0.10' (the version travels IN the PDF, per operator order); rebuilt - tests updated to ENFORCE the retirement (all old variants must 404); full suite 152 passed
2026-08-15 19:43:08 +00:00
Superseded early drafts (v0.1, v0.2) were removed from the working tree
on 2026-08-15; like every prior state of this folder, they remain
retrievable from this repository's git history.
paper folder: signpost which file is current (operator decision 2026-08-08: keep drafts + note) paper/README.md tells a visitor that ltl.pdf is the submitted version frozen during review, that v0.1/v0.2 are superseded history, and that v0.3-v0.9 live in git history. Also corrects the stale web.py comment that labeled the live pdf 'v0.3 reinvention' (it is the v0.9 submitted version). No served bytes change; the comment fix reaches the droplet with the next routine app update.
2026-08-08 16:44:13 +00:00
Revisions v0.3–v0.9 were successive overwrites of `ltl.tex`; they live in
sweep the last v0.10 remnants out of comments and the paper README tail
2026-08-16 11:19:13 +00:00
this repository's git history. v0.9 is the version that was submitted
coherence sweep wave 1 (pacta): the v0.11 era leaves ESTATE/llms/comments Cross-repo audit findings 1-9,29: ESTATE snapshot to v0.15+DOI, suite count 157, mermaid paper node, retired /paper/v0.x routes dropped from the endpoint row, pasta row aligned to the subject repo's own claim (field foundation proven, completion pending), llms.txt to v0.15+DOI, paper/README supersession tail through v0.15, web.py route comment, ltl.tex header comment no longer names the private reinvention outline or the rejection (moat + zero-process in public files), litex-boards dropped from the sources row (not in the pinned pool). Paper PDF bytes untouched (comment-only tex change; v0.15 artifact stays byte-stable — the committed PDF is the version-of-record built at v0.15 release).
2026-08-22 16:40:11 +00:00
for review; v0.10 through v0.15 supersede it (history above).
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink