onnxruntime/onnxruntime/test/testdata/ep_dynamic_graph_input_test.py
Justin Chu d834ec895a
Adopt linrtunner as the linting tool - take 2 (#15085)
### Description

`lintrunner` is a linter runner successfully used by pytorch, onnx and
onnx-script. It provides a uniform experience running linters locally
and in CI. It supports all major dev systems: Windows, Linux and MacOs.
The checks are enforced by the `Python format` workflow.

This PR adopts `lintrunner` to onnxruntime and fixed ~2000 flake8 errors
in Python code. `lintrunner` now runs all required python lints
including `ruff`(replacing `flake8`), `black` and `isort`. Future lints
like `clang-format` can be added.

Most errors are auto-fixed by `ruff` and the fixes should be considered
robust.

Lints that are more complicated to fix are applied `# noqa` for now and
should be fixed in follow up PRs.

### Notable changes

1. This PR **removed some suboptimal patterns**:

	- `not xxx in` -> `xxx not in` membership checks
	- bare excepts (`except:` -> `except Exception`)
	- unused imports
	
	The follow up PR will remove:
	
	- `import *`
	- mutable values as default in function definitions (`def func(a=[])`)
	- more unused imports
	- unused local variables

2. Use `ruff` to replace `flake8`. `ruff` is much (40x) faster than
flake8 and is more robust. We are using it successfully in onnx and
onnx-script. It also supports auto-fixing many flake8 errors.

3. Removed the legacy flake8 ci flow and updated docs.

4. The added workflow supports SARIF code scanning reports on github,
example snapshot:
	

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11205048/212598953-d60ce8a9-f242-4fa8-8674-8696b704604a.png)

5. Removed `onnxruntime-python-checks-ci-pipeline` as redundant

### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->

Unified linting experience in CI and local.

Replacing https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/pull/14306

---------

Signed-off-by: Justin Chu <justinchu@microsoft.com>
2023-03-24 15:29:03 -07:00

46 lines
1.6 KiB
Python

import onnx
from onnx import TensorProto, helper
# Since NNAPI EP does not support dynamic shape input and we now switch from the approach of immediately rejecting
# the whole graph in NNAPI EP if it has a dynamic input to checking the dynamic shape at individual operator support check level,
# We have a separated test here using a graph with dynamic input that becomes fixed after a Resize
# Please see BaseOpBuilder::HasSupportedInputs in <repo_root>/onnxruntime/core/providers/nnapi/nnapi_builtin/builders/op_support_checker.cc
def GenerateModel(model_name): # noqa: N802
nodes = [
helper.make_node(
"Resize",
["X", "", "", "Resize_1_sizes"],
["Resize_1_output"],
"resize_1",
mode="cubic",
),
helper.make_node("Add", ["Resize_1_output", "Add_2_input"], ["Y"], "add"),
]
initializers = [
helper.make_tensor("Resize_1_sizes", TensorProto.INT64, [4], [1, 1, 3, 3]),
helper.make_tensor(
"Add_2_input",
TensorProto.FLOAT,
[1, 1, 3, 3],
[1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0],
),
]
inputs = [
helper.make_tensor_value_info("X", TensorProto.FLOAT, ["1", "1", "N", "N"]), # used dim_param here
]
outputs = [
helper.make_tensor_value_info("Y", TensorProto.FLOAT, [1, 1, 3, 3]),
]
graph = helper.make_graph(nodes, "EP_Dynamic_Graph_Input_Test", inputs, outputs, initializers)
model = helper.make_model(graph)
onnx.save(model, model_name)
if __name__ == "__main__":
GenerateModel("ep_dynamic_graph_input_test.onnx")