onnxruntime/orttraining/tools/ci_test/compare_huggingface.py
Justin Chu d834ec895a
Adopt linrtunner as the linting tool - take 2 (#15085)
### Description

`lintrunner` is a linter runner successfully used by pytorch, onnx and
onnx-script. It provides a uniform experience running linters locally
and in CI. It supports all major dev systems: Windows, Linux and MacOs.
The checks are enforced by the `Python format` workflow.

This PR adopts `lintrunner` to onnxruntime and fixed ~2000 flake8 errors
in Python code. `lintrunner` now runs all required python lints
including `ruff`(replacing `flake8`), `black` and `isort`. Future lints
like `clang-format` can be added.

Most errors are auto-fixed by `ruff` and the fixes should be considered
robust.

Lints that are more complicated to fix are applied `# noqa` for now and
should be fixed in follow up PRs.

### Notable changes

1. This PR **removed some suboptimal patterns**:

	- `not xxx in` -> `xxx not in` membership checks
	- bare excepts (`except:` -> `except Exception`)
	- unused imports
	
	The follow up PR will remove:
	
	- `import *`
	- mutable values as default in function definitions (`def func(a=[])`)
	- more unused imports
	- unused local variables

2. Use `ruff` to replace `flake8`. `ruff` is much (40x) faster than
flake8 and is more robust. We are using it successfully in onnx and
onnx-script. It also supports auto-fixing many flake8 errors.

3. Removed the legacy flake8 ci flow and updated docs.

4. The added workflow supports SARIF code scanning reports on github,
example snapshot:
	

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11205048/212598953-d60ce8a9-f242-4fa8-8674-8696b704604a.png)

5. Removed `onnxruntime-python-checks-ci-pipeline` as redundant

### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->

Unified linting experience in CI and local.

Replacing https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/pull/14306

---------

Signed-off-by: Justin Chu <justinchu@microsoft.com>
2023-03-24 15:29:03 -07:00

52 lines
1.4 KiB
Python
Executable file

import collections
import json
import sys
actual = sys.argv[1]
expect = sys.argv[2]
with open(actual) as file_actual:
json_actual = json.loads(file_actual.read())
with open(expect) as file_expect:
json_expect = json.loads(file_expect.read())
def almost_equal(x, y, threshold=0.05):
return abs(x - y) < threshold
# loss curve tail match
loss_tail_length = 4
loss_tail_matches = collections.deque(maxlen=loss_tail_length)
logged_steps = len(json_actual["steps"])
for i in range(logged_steps):
step_actual = json_actual["steps"][i]
step_expect = json_expect["steps"][i]
is_match = step_actual["step"] == step_expect["step"]
is_match = is_match if almost_equal(step_actual["loss"], step_expect["loss"]) else False
loss_tail_matches.append(is_match)
print(
"step {} loss actual {:.6f} expected {:.6f} match {}".format(
step_actual["step"],
step_actual["loss"],
step_expect["loss"],
is_match if logged_steps - i <= loss_tail_length else "n/a",
)
)
success = all(loss_tail_matches)
# performance match
threshold = 0.95
is_performant = json_actual["samples_per_second"] >= threshold * json_expect["samples_per_second"]
success = success if is_performant else False
print(
"samples_per_second actual {:.3f} expected {:.3f} in-range {}".format(
json_actual["samples_per_second"], json_expect["samples_per_second"], is_performant
)
)
assert success