onnxruntime/js/web/test/test-runner.ts

976 lines
37 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
// Licensed under the MIT License.
import {expect} from 'chai';
import * as ort from 'onnxruntime-common';
import {extname} from 'path';
import {inspect} from 'util';
import {Attribute} from '../lib/onnxjs/attribute';
import {InferenceHandler, resolveBackend, SessionHandler} from '../lib/onnxjs/backend';
import {createWebGLContext} from '../lib/onnxjs/backends/webgl/webgl-context-factory';
import {Logger, Profiler} from '../lib/onnxjs/instrument';
import {Operator} from '../lib/onnxjs/operators';
import {onnx} from '../lib/onnxjs/ort-schema/protobuf/onnx';
import {Tensor} from '../lib/onnxjs/tensor';
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
import {ProtoUtil} from '../lib/onnxjs/util';
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
import {createView} from '../lib/wasm/jsep/tensor-view';
import {getTensorElementSize, isGpuBufferSupportedType, tensorDataTypeStringToEnum} from '../lib/wasm/wasm-common';
import {base64toBuffer, createMockGraph, readFile} from './test-shared';
import {Test} from './test-types';
// the threshold that used to compare 2 float numbers. See above for TensorResultValidator.floatEqual().
const CPU_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR = 1.0e-4;
const CPU_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR = 1.000001;
const WEBGL_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR = 1.0e-3;
const WEBGL_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR = 1.00001;
const WEBGL_HALF_FLOAT_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR = 0.1;
const WEBGL_HALF_FLOAT_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR = 1.02;
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
const WEBGPU_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR = 1.0e-3;
const WEBGPU_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR = 1.00001;
const WASM_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR = 1.0e-4;
const WASM_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR = 1.000001;
const ONNXRUNTIME_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR = 1.0e-3;
const ONNXRUNTIME_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR = 1.00001;
/**
* returns a number to represent the current timestamp in a resolution as high as possible.
*/
const now = (typeof performance !== 'undefined' && performance.now) ? () => performance.now() : Date.now;
function toInternalTensor(tensor: ort.Tensor): Tensor {
return new Tensor(
tensor.dims, tensor.type as Tensor.DataType, undefined, undefined, tensor.data as Tensor.NumberType);
}
function fromInternalTensor(tensor: Tensor): ort.Tensor {
return new ort.Tensor(tensor.type, tensor.data as ort.Tensor.DataType, tensor.dims);
}
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
async function loadTensorProto(uriOrData: string|Uint8Array, allowInt64 = false): Promise<Test.NamedTensor> {
const buf = (typeof uriOrData === 'string') ? await readFile(uriOrData) : uriOrData;
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
const tensorProto = onnx.TensorProto.decode(buf);
let tensor: ort.Tensor;
// by default, we don't allow (u)int64. this is for backward compatibility.
if (allowInt64 && tensorProto && tensorProto.dataType &&
((tensorProto.dataType === onnx.TensorProto.DataType.INT64 ||
tensorProto.dataType === onnx.TensorProto.DataType.UINT64))) {
const signed = tensorProto.dataType === onnx.TensorProto.DataType.INT64;
const dataConstructor = signed ? BigInt64Array : BigUint64Array;
const length = tensorProto.rawData.byteLength / 8;
const data = new dataConstructor(length);
if (tensorProto.rawData && typeof tensorProto.rawData.byteLength === 'number' &&
tensorProto.rawData.byteLength > 0) {
const dataSource =
new DataView(tensorProto.rawData.buffer, tensorProto.rawData.byteOffset, tensorProto.rawData.byteLength);
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
data[i] = signed ? dataSource.getBigInt64(i * 8, true) : dataSource.getBigUint64(i * 8, true);
}
} else {
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
data[i] = BigInt((signed ? tensorProto.int64Data : tensorProto.uint64Data)![i].toString());
}
}
tensor = new ort.Tensor(signed ? 'int64' : 'uint64', data, ProtoUtil.tensorDimsFromProto(tensorProto.dims));
} else {
const internalTensor = Tensor.fromProto(tensorProto);
tensor = fromInternalTensor(internalTensor);
}
// add property 'name' to the tensor object.
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
const namedTensor = tensor as unknown as Test.NamedTensor;
namedTensor.name = tensorProto.name;
return namedTensor;
}
async function loadMlProto(_uriOrData: string|Uint8Array): Promise<Test.NamedTensor> {
return Promise.reject('not supported');
}
async function loadTensors(
modelMetaData: {inputNames: readonly string[]; outputNames: readonly string[]}, testCase: Test.ModelTestCase,
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
backendName: string, fileCache?: FileCacheBuffer) {
const inputs: Test.NamedTensor[] = [];
const outputs: Test.NamedTensor[] = [];
let dataFileType: 'none'|'pb'|'npy' = 'none';
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
const allowInt64 = ['wasm', 'xnnpack', 'webgpu'].includes(backendName);
for (const dataFile of testCase.dataFiles) {
const ext = extname(dataFile);
if (ext.toLowerCase() === '.pb' || ext.toLowerCase() === '.tpb') {
if (dataFileType === 'none') {
dataFileType = 'pb';
}
if (dataFileType !== 'pb') {
throw new Error(`cannot load data from test case "${testCase.name}", multiple types of files detected`);
}
const uriOrData = fileCache && fileCache[dataFile] ? fileCache[dataFile] : dataFile;
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
const t = ext.toLowerCase() === '.pb' ? await loadTensorProto(uriOrData, allowInt64) : // onnx.TensorProto
await loadMlProto(uriOrData);
const dataFileBasename = dataFile.split(/[/\\]/).pop()!;
if (dataFileBasename.indexOf('input') !== -1) {
inputs.push(t);
} else if (dataFileBasename.indexOf('output') !== -1) {
outputs.push(t);
}
} else {
throw new Error(`${ext} file is not supported now`);
}
}
// if model has single input/output, and tensor name is empty, we assign model's input/output names to it.
if (modelMetaData.inputNames.length === 1 && inputs.length === 1 && !inputs[0].name) {
inputs[0].name = modelMetaData.inputNames[0];
}
if (modelMetaData.outputNames.length === 1 && outputs.length === 1 && !outputs[0].name) {
outputs[0].name = modelMetaData.outputNames[0];
}
testCase.inputs = inputs;
testCase.outputs = outputs;
}
async function initializeSession(
modelFilePath: string, backendHint: ort.InferenceSession.ExecutionProviderConfig, ioBindingMode: Test.IOBindingMode,
profile: boolean, sessionOptions: ort.InferenceSession.SessionOptions,
fileCache?: FileCacheBuffer): Promise<ort.InferenceSession> {
const preloadModelData: Uint8Array|undefined =
fileCache && fileCache[modelFilePath] ? fileCache[modelFilePath] : undefined;
Logger.verbose(
'TestRunner',
`Start to load model from file: ${modelFilePath}${
preloadModelData ? ` [preloaded(${preloadModelData.byteLength})]` : ''}`);
const profilerConfig = profile ? {maxNumberEvents: 65536} : undefined;
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
const sessionConfig = {
...sessionOptions,
executionProviders: [backendHint],
profiler: profilerConfig,
enableProfiling: profile,
preferredOutputLocation: ioBindingMode === 'gpu-location' ? ('gpu-buffer' as const) : undefined
};
let session: ort.InferenceSession;
try {
if (preloadModelData) {
session = await ort.InferenceSession.create(preloadModelData, sessionConfig);
} else {
session = await ort.InferenceSession.create(modelFilePath, sessionConfig);
}
} catch (e) {
Update XNNPACK to latest version (#18038) ### Description <!-- Describe your changes. --> Update XNNPACK to latest version - adds fp16 kernels and various other improvements - requires pthreadpool update as well Most code updates in the XNNPACK EP are to adjust to the new XNNPACK API - 'setup' is split into 'reshape' and 'setup' - some ops use a workspace buffer - copied workspace allocation from XNNPACK unit test code - some suffixes changed Added wrapper for XNNPACK caches to base XNNPACK EP kernel - simplifies usage - XNNPACK split out the code and weights caches, but the code cache isn't currently usable via the public API - we could use the internal types if we think it's required for performance reasons. non-trivial though as we'd need to propagate ifdef values from the XNNPACK build up to the ORT build. - using XNNPACK internals would also mean we would not be able to support using a pre-build XNNPACK package - not an issue currently Fixed opset registration for internal NHWC domain - was not being tied to the ONNX version, so nodes inserted by layout transformation had the incorrect opset - a number of other places needed updating once this issue was fixed Remove support for NCHW Resize from XNNPACK EP so it's NHWC only - we only supported NCHW for fp32, - doing so adds complexity in multiple places (XNNPACK EP kernel implementation, layout transformation and transpose optimization) - unclear if that complexity provides any benefit. can add back if required by production scenario ### Motivation and Context <!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? - If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> We're looking at enabling fp16 support for CoreML and NNAPI. If we do that we need a good fallback story if the CPU EP will be used. The XNNPACK fp16 kernels will hopefully provide that. NOTE: This PR doesn't add fp16 support to the XNNPACK EP kernels. That can be done as required in separate EPs and should be relatively simple to do.
2023-11-03 16:04:28 +00:00
Logger.error(
'TestRunner',
`Failed to load model from file: ${modelFilePath}. ` +
`Error: ${e.message} @ ${e.fileName}:${e.lineNumber}`);
throw e;
}
if (profile) {
session.startProfiling();
}
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', `Finished loading model from file: ${modelFilePath}`);
return session;
}
type FileCacheBuffer = {
[filePath: string]: Uint8Array;
};
/**
* a ModelTestContext object contains all states in a ModelTest
*/
export class ModelTestContext {
private constructor(
readonly session: ort.InferenceSession,
readonly backend: string,
readonly perfData: ModelTestContext.ModelTestPerfData,
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
readonly ioBinding: Test.IOBindingMode,
private readonly profile: boolean,
) {}
/**
* dump the current performance data
*/
private logPerfData() {
const data = this.perfData;
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', '***Perf Data Start');
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', ` * Init : ${data.init}`);
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', ` * Running times : ${data.count}`);
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', ` * FirstRun : ${data.firstRun.toFixed(2)}`);
const runs = data.runs;
if (runs.length > 0) {
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', ` * Runs : ${runs.map(r => r.toFixed(2)).join(', ')}`);
if (runs.length > 1) {
const sorted = runs.sort((a, b) => a - b);
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', ` * Runs P50 : ${sorted[Math.floor((runs.length - 1) / 2)].toFixed(2)}`);
const avg = runs.reduce((prev, current) => prev + current) / runs.length;
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', ` * Runs Avg : ${avg.toFixed(2)}`);
const variance = runs.reduce((prev, current) => prev + (current - avg) * (current - avg));
const sd = Math.sqrt(variance / (runs.length - 1));
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', ` * Runs SD : ${sd.toFixed(2)}`);
}
}
Logger.verbose('TestRunner.Perf', '***Perf Data End');
}
async release(): Promise<void> {
if (this.profile) {
this.session.endProfiling();
}
this.logPerfData();
await this.session.release();
}
/**
* create a ModelTestContext object that used in every test cases in the given ModelTest.
*/
static async create(modelTest: Test.ModelTest, profile: boolean, testOptions?: Test.Options):
Promise<ModelTestContext> {
if (this.initializing) {
throw new Error('cannot create a ModelTestContext object when the previous creation is not done');
}
try {
this.initializing = true;
const initStart = now();
const executionProviderConfig =
modelTest.backend === 'webnn' ? (testOptions?.webnnOptions || 'webnn') : modelTest.backend!;
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
const session = await initializeSession(
modelTest.modelUrl, executionProviderConfig, modelTest.ioBinding, profile, testOptions?.sessionOptions || {},
this.cache);
const initEnd = now();
for (const testCase of modelTest.cases) {
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
await loadTensors(session, testCase, modelTest.backend!, this.cache);
}
return new ModelTestContext(
session,
modelTest.backend!,
{init: initEnd - initStart, firstRun: -1, runs: [], count: 0},
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
modelTest.ioBinding,
profile,
);
} finally {
this.initializing = false;
}
}
/**
* set the global file cache for looking up model and tensor protobuf files.
*/
static setCache(cache: Test.FileCache): void {
const keys = Object.keys(cache);
Logger.info('TestRunner', `Setting up file cache... Entry count: ${keys.length}.`);
for (const key of keys) {
this.cache[key] = base64toBuffer(cache[key]);
}
}
private static initializing = false;
private static cache: FileCacheBuffer = {};
}
export declare namespace ModelTestContext {
export interface ModelTestPerfData {
init: number;
firstRun: number;
runs: number[];
count: number;
}
}
export class TensorResultValidator {
private readonly absoluteThreshold: number;
private readonly relativeThreshold: number;
private readonly maxFloatValue: number = 3.4028234663852886e+38;
private static isHalfFloat: boolean|undefined;
constructor(backend: string) {
if (backend === 'cpu') {
this.absoluteThreshold = CPU_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR;
this.relativeThreshold = CPU_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR;
} else if (backend === 'webgl') {
if (TensorResultValidator.isHalfFloat === undefined) {
TensorResultValidator.isHalfFloat = !createWebGLContext(ort.env.webgl.contextId).isRenderFloat32Supported;
}
if (TensorResultValidator.isHalfFloat) {
this.maxFloatValue = 65504;
this.absoluteThreshold = WEBGL_HALF_FLOAT_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR;
this.relativeThreshold = WEBGL_HALF_FLOAT_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR;
} else {
this.absoluteThreshold = WEBGL_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR;
this.relativeThreshold = WEBGL_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR;
}
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
} else if (backend === 'webgpu') {
this.absoluteThreshold = WEBGPU_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR;
this.relativeThreshold = WEBGPU_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR;
} else if (backend === 'wasm' || backend === 'xnnpack' || backend === 'webnn') {
this.absoluteThreshold = WASM_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR;
this.relativeThreshold = WASM_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR;
} else if (backend === 'onnxruntime') {
this.absoluteThreshold = ONNXRUNTIME_THRESHOLD_ABSOLUTE_ERROR;
this.relativeThreshold = ONNXRUNTIME_THRESHOLD_RELATIVE_ERROR;
} else {
throw new Error(`backend not supported: ${backend}`);
}
}
checkTensorResult(actual: Tensor[], expected: Tensor[]): void {
// check output size
expect(actual.length, 'size of output tensors').to.equal(expected.length);
// compare output one-by-one
for (let i = 0; i < actual.length; ++i) {
const match = this.areEqual(actual[i], expected[i]);
if (!match) {
Logger.error(
'TestRunner',
`Tensor mismatch: \nACTUAL: type=${actual[i].type}; dims=[${actual[i].dims}]; data=[${
actual[i].data}]\nEXPECT: type=${expected[i].type}; dims=[${expected[i].dims}]; data=[${
expected[i].data}]`);
}
expect(match, 'tensor data should match').to.be.true;
}
}
checkApiTensorResult(actual: ort.Tensor[], expected: ort.Tensor[]): void {
this.checkTensorResult(actual.map(toInternalTensor), expected.map(toInternalTensor));
}
checkNamedTensorResult(actual: Record<string, ort.Tensor>, expected: Test.NamedTensor[]): void {
// check output size
expect(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(actual).length, 'size of output tensors').to.equal(expected.length);
// check output mapping
for (const expectedOneOutput of expected) {
expect(actual, 'keys of output tensors').to.contain.keys(expectedOneOutput.name);
}
this.checkApiTensorResult(expected.map(i => actual[i.name]!), expected);
}
// This function check whether 2 tensors should be considered as 'match' or not
areEqual(actual: Tensor, expected: Tensor): boolean {
if (!actual || !expected) {
return false;
}
if (!actual.dims || !expected.dims) {
return false;
}
const actualDims = actual.dims;
const actualType = actual.type;
const expectedDims = expected.dims;
const expectedType = expected.type;
if (actualType !== expectedType) {
return false;
}
if (actualDims.length !== expectedDims.length) {
return false;
}
for (let i = 0; i < actualDims.length; i++) {
if (actualDims[i] !== expectedDims[i]) {
return false;
}
}
switch (actualType) {
case 'string':
return this.strictEqual(actual.stringData, expected.stringData);
case 'float32':
case 'float64':
return this.floatEqual(
actual.numberData as number[] | Float32Array | Float64Array,
expected.numberData as number[] | Float32Array | Float64Array);
case 'uint8':
case 'int8':
case 'uint16':
case 'int16':
case 'int32':
case 'uint32':
case 'int64':
case 'bool':
return TensorResultValidator.integerEqual(
actual.numberData as number[] | Uint8Array | Int8Array | Uint16Array | Int16Array | Uint32Array |
Int32Array,
expected.numberData as number[] | Uint8Array | Int8Array | Uint16Array | Int16Array | Uint32Array |
Int32Array);
default:
throw new Error('type not implemented or not supported');
}
}
strictEqual<T>(actual: T, expected: T): boolean {
try {
expect(actual).to.deep.equal(expected);
return true;
} catch {
return false;
}
}
floatEqual(actual: number[]|Float32Array|Float64Array, expected: number[]|Float32Array|Float64Array): boolean {
if (actual.length !== expected.length) {
return false;
}
for (let i = actual.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
const a = actual[i];
let b = expected[i];
if (a === b) {
continue; // exact the same value, treat as equal
}
// check for NaN
//
if (Number.isNaN(a) && Number.isNaN(b)) {
continue; // 2 numbers are NaN, treat as equal
}
if (Number.isNaN(a) || Number.isNaN(b)) {
Logger.error('Validator', `a or b isNan -- index:${i}: actual=${actual[i]},expected=${expected[i]}`);
return false; // one is NaN and the other is not
}
// check for Infinity
//
if (!Number.isFinite(a) || !Number.isFinite(b)) {
Logger.error('Validator', `a or b is Infinity -- index:${i}: actual=${actual[i]},expected=${expected[i]}`);
return false; // at least one is Infinity and the other is not or their sign is different
}
// normalize value of b
b = Math.max(Math.min(expected[i], this.maxFloatValue), -this.maxFloatValue);
// Comparing 2 float numbers: (Suppose a >= b)
//
// if ( a - b < ABSOLUTE_ERROR || 1.0 < a / b < RELATIVE_ERROR)
// test pass
// else
// test fail
// endif
//
if (Math.abs(actual[i] - expected[i]) < this.absoluteThreshold) {
continue; // absolute error check pass
}
if (a !== 0 && b !== 0 && a / b < this.relativeThreshold && b / a < this.relativeThreshold) {
continue; // relative error check pass
}
// if code goes here, it means both (abs/rel) check failed.
Logger.error('Validator', `abs/rel check failed-- index:${i}: actual=${actual[i]},expected=${expected[i]}`);
return false;
}
return true;
}
static integerEqual(
actual: number[]|Uint8Array|Int8Array|Uint16Array|Int16Array|Uint32Array|Int32Array,
expected: number[]|Uint8Array|Int8Array|Uint16Array|Int16Array|Uint32Array|Int32Array): boolean {
if (actual.length !== expected.length) {
return false;
}
for (let i = actual.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (actual[i] !== expected[i]) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
function createGpuTensorForInput(cpuTensor: ort.Tensor): ort.Tensor {
if (!isGpuBufferSupportedType(cpuTensor.type) || Array.isArray(cpuTensor.data)) {
throw new Error(`createGpuTensorForInput can not work with ${cpuTensor.type} tensor`);
}
const device = ort.env.webgpu.device as GPUDevice;
const gpuBuffer = device.createBuffer({
// eslint-disable-next-line no-bitwise
usage: GPUBufferUsage.COPY_SRC | GPUBufferUsage.COPY_DST | GPUBufferUsage.STORAGE,
size: Math.ceil(cpuTensor.data.byteLength / 16) * 16,
mappedAtCreation: true
});
const arrayBuffer = gpuBuffer.getMappedRange();
new Uint8Array(arrayBuffer)
.set(new Uint8Array(cpuTensor.data.buffer, cpuTensor.data.byteOffset, cpuTensor.data.byteLength));
gpuBuffer.unmap();
// TODO: how to "await" for the copy to finish, so that we can get more accurate performance data?
return ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(
gpuBuffer, {dataType: cpuTensor.type, dims: cpuTensor.dims, dispose: () => gpuBuffer.destroy()});
}
function createGpuTensorForOutput(type: ort.Tensor.Type, dims: readonly number[]) {
if (!isGpuBufferSupportedType(type)) {
throw new Error(`createGpuTensorForOutput can not work with ${type} tensor`);
}
const elementSizeInBytes = getTensorElementSize(tensorDataTypeStringToEnum(type))!;
const size = dims.reduce((a, b) => a * b, 1) * elementSizeInBytes;
const device = ort.env.webgpu.device as GPUDevice;
const gpuBuffer = device.createBuffer({
// eslint-disable-next-line no-bitwise
usage: GPUBufferUsage.COPY_SRC | GPUBufferUsage.COPY_DST | GPUBufferUsage.STORAGE,
size: Math.ceil(size / 16) * 16
});
return ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(gpuBuffer, {
dataType: type,
dims,
dispose: () => gpuBuffer.destroy(),
download: async () => {
const stagingBuffer = device.createBuffer({
// eslint-disable-next-line no-bitwise
usage: GPUBufferUsage.MAP_READ | GPUBufferUsage.COPY_DST,
size: gpuBuffer.size
});
const encoder = device.createCommandEncoder();
encoder.copyBufferToBuffer(gpuBuffer, 0, stagingBuffer, 0, gpuBuffer.size);
device.queue.submit([encoder.finish()]);
await stagingBuffer.mapAsync(GPUMapMode.READ);
const arrayBuffer = stagingBuffer.getMappedRange().slice(0, size);
stagingBuffer.destroy();
return createView(arrayBuffer, type) as ort.Tensor.DataTypeMap[ort.Tensor.GpuBufferDataTypes];
}
});
}
export async function sessionRun(options: {
session: ort.InferenceSession; feeds: Record<string, ort.Tensor>;
outputsMetaInfo: Record<string, Pick<ort.Tensor, 'dims'|'type'>>;
ioBinding: Test.IOBindingMode;
}): Promise<[number, number, ort.InferenceSession.OnnxValueMapType]> {
const session = options.session;
const feeds = options.feeds;
const fetches: Record<string, ort.Tensor> = {};
// currently we only support IO Binding for WebGPU
//
// For inputs, we create GPU tensors on both 'gpu-tensor' and 'gpu-location' binding testing mode.
// For outputs, we create GPU tensors on 'gpu-tensor' binding testing mode only.
// in 'gpu-device' binding mode, outputs are not pre-allocated.
const shouldUploadInput = options.ioBinding === 'gpu-tensor' || options.ioBinding === 'gpu-location';
const shouldUploadOutput = options.ioBinding === 'gpu-tensor';
try {
if (shouldUploadInput) {
// replace the CPU tensors in feeds into GPU tensors
for (const name in feeds) {
if (Object.hasOwnProperty.call(feeds, name)) {
feeds[name] = createGpuTensorForInput(feeds[name]);
}
}
}
if (shouldUploadOutput) {
for (const name in options.outputsMetaInfo) {
if (Object.hasOwnProperty.call(options.outputsMetaInfo, name)) {
const {type, dims} = options.outputsMetaInfo[name];
fetches[name] = createGpuTensorForOutput(type, dims);
}
}
}
const start = now();
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', `Timestamp before session run: ${start}`);
const outputs = await (
shouldUploadOutput ? session.run(feeds, fetches) :
session.run(feeds, Object.getOwnPropertyNames(options.outputsMetaInfo)));
const end = now();
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', `Timestamp after session run: ${end}`);
// download each output tensor if needed
for (const name in outputs) {
if (Object.hasOwnProperty.call(outputs, name)) {
const tensor = outputs[name];
// Tensor.getData(true) release the underlying resource
await tensor.getData(true);
}
}
return [start, end, outputs];
} finally {
// dispose the GPU tensors in feeds
for (const name in feeds) {
if (Object.hasOwnProperty.call(feeds, name)) {
const tensor = feeds[name];
tensor.dispose();
}
}
}
}
/**
* run a single model test case. the inputs/outputs tensors should already been prepared.
*/
export async function runModelTestSet(
context: ModelTestContext, testCase: Test.ModelTestCase, testName: string): Promise<void> {
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', `Start to run test data from folder: ${testName}/${testCase.name}`);
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', `Start to run test data from folder: ${testCase.name}`);
const validator = new TensorResultValidator(context.backend);
try {
const feeds: Record<string, ort.Tensor> = {};
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
const outputsMetaInfo: Record<string, ort.Tensor> = {};
testCase.inputs!.forEach((tensor, i) => feeds[context.session.inputNames[i]] = tensor);
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
testCase.outputs!.forEach((tensor, i) => outputsMetaInfo[context.session.outputNames[i]] = tensor);
const [start, end, outputs] =
await sessionRun({session: context.session, feeds, outputsMetaInfo, ioBinding: context.ioBinding});
if (context.perfData.count === 0) {
context.perfData.firstRun = end - start;
} else {
context.perfData.runs.push(end - start);
}
context.perfData.count++;
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', `Finished running model from file: ${testCase.name}`);
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', ' Stats:');
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', ` Input(s): ${testCase.inputs!.length}`);
testCase.inputs!.forEach(i => {
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', ` '${i.name}': ${i.type}[${i.dims.join(',')}]`);
});
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', ` Output(s): ${Object.keys(outputs).length}`);
for (const name in outputs) {
if (Object.hasOwnProperty.call(outputs, name)) {
const tensor = outputs[name];
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', ` '${name}': ${tensor.type}[${tensor.dims.join(',')}]`);
}
}
validator.checkNamedTensorResult(outputs, testCase.outputs!);
Logger.verbose('TestRunner', ' Result: PASS');
} catch (e) {
Logger.error('TestRunner', ' Result: FAILED');
Logger.error('TestRunner', `Failed to run test data from folder: ${testCase.name}. Error: ${inspect(e)}`);
throw e;
}
}
function initializeOperator(
sessionHandler: SessionHandler, opType: string, attributeValues: readonly Test.AttributeValue[],
opsetImports: readonly Test.OperatorTestOpsetImport[]): Operator {
const attributes = new Attribute(undefined);
attributeValues.forEach(value => attributes.set(value.name, value.type, value.data));
const graph = createMockGraph(opType, attributes);
return sessionHandler.resolve(graph.getNodes()[0], opsetImports, graph);
}
/**
* a OpTestContext object contains all states in a OpTest. used for webgl backend.
*/
export class OpTestContext {
static profiler = Profiler.create();
readonly backendHint: string;
sessionHandler: SessionHandler;
inferenceHandler: InferenceHandler;
constructor(protected opTest: Test.OperatorTest) {
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
this.backendHint = opTest.backend ?? 'cpu';
}
createOperator(): Operator {
return initializeOperator(
this.sessionHandler, this.opTest.operator, this.opTest.attributes || [],
[this.opTest.opset ?? {domain: '', version: 7}]);
}
async dispose(): Promise<void> {
this.inferenceHandler.dispose();
this.sessionHandler.dispose();
}
async init(): Promise<void> {
const backend = await resolveBackend(this.backendHint);
this.sessionHandler = backend.createSessionHandler({profiler: OpTestContext.profiler});
this.inferenceHandler = this.sessionHandler.createInferenceHandler();
}
}
/**
* a ProtoOpTestContext uses a protobuf model for operator test. used for ORT based backend.
*/
export class ProtoOpTestContext {
private readonly loadedData: Uint8Array; // model data, inputs, outputs
session: ort.InferenceSession;
readonly backendHint: string;
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
readonly ioBindingMode: Test.IOBindingMode;
constructor(test: Test.OperatorTest, private readonly sessionOptions: ort.InferenceSession.SessionOptions = {}) {
const opsetImport = onnx.OperatorSetIdProto.create(test.opset);
const operator = test.operator;
const attribute = (test.attributes || []).map(attr => {
const protoAttr = onnx.AttributeProto.create({name: attr.name});
switch (attr.type) {
case 'float':
protoAttr.type = onnx.AttributeProto.AttributeType.FLOAT;
protoAttr.f = attr.data as number;
break;
case 'int':
protoAttr.type = onnx.AttributeProto.AttributeType.INT;
protoAttr.i = attr.data as number;
break;
case 'string':
protoAttr.type = onnx.AttributeProto.AttributeType.STRING;
protoAttr.s = new TextEncoder().encode(attr.data as string);
break;
case 'floats':
protoAttr.type = onnx.AttributeProto.AttributeType.FLOATS;
protoAttr.floats = attr.data as number[];
break;
case 'ints':
protoAttr.type = onnx.AttributeProto.AttributeType.INTS;
protoAttr.ints = attr.data as number[];
break;
case 'strings':
protoAttr.type = onnx.AttributeProto.AttributeType.STRINGS;
protoAttr.strings = (attr.data as string[]).map(s => new TextEncoder().encode(s));
break;
default:
throw new Error(`Unsupported attribute type: ${attr.type}`);
}
return protoAttr;
});
if (test.cases.length === 0) {
throw new Error(`No test cases found for test: ${test.name} [${test.operator}]`);
}
const inputCount = test.cases[0].inputs!.length;
const outputCount = test.cases[0].outputs!.length;
if (test.cases.some(
testCase => testCase.inputs!.length !== inputCount || testCase.outputs!.length !== outputCount)) {
throw new Error(
`Test cases for test: ${test.name} [${test.operator}] must have the same number of inputs and outputs`);
}
const model = onnx.ModelProto.create();
model.irVersion = onnx.Version.IR_VERSION;
model.opsetImport.push(opsetImport);
model.graph = onnx.GraphProto.create();
model.graph.node = [onnx.NodeProto.create({
input: test.cases[0].inputs!.map((_, i) => `input_${i}`),
output: test.cases[0].outputs!.map((_, i) => `output_${i}`),
opType: operator,
domain: test.opset?.domain,
name: operator,
attribute
})];
// normalize input shape definitions
let normalizedInputShapeDefinitions: ReadonlyArray<Test.InputShapeDefinition|undefined>;
if (!test.inputShapeDefinitions || test.inputShapeDefinitions === 'none') {
// if inputShapeDefinitions is not specified, use undefined for all inputs
normalizedInputShapeDefinitions = new Array(inputCount).fill(undefined);
} else if (test.inputShapeDefinitions === 'rankOnly') {
// check if all test cases have data
if (test.cases.some(testCase => testCase.inputs!.some(input => !input.data || !input.dims))) {
throw new Error(`Test cases for test: ${test.name} [${
test.operator}] must have data for each inputs when inputShapeDefinitions is 'rankOnly'`);
}
// if inputShapeDefinitions is 'rankOnly', use semantic names for all inputs. This means only rank is specified.
normalizedInputShapeDefinitions =
test.cases[0].inputs!.map((input: Test.TensorValue, i) => input.dims.map((_, j) => `_input_${i}_d${j}`));
// check if all test cases have the same rank for each inputs
if (test.cases.some(
testCase => testCase.inputs!.some(
(input: Test.TensorValue, i) =>
input.dims.length !== (test.cases[0].inputs![i] as Test.TensorValue).dims.length))) {
throw new Error(`Test cases for test: ${test.name} [${
test.operator}] must have the same rank for each inputs in different test cases`);
}
} else if (test.inputShapeDefinitions === 'static') {
// check if all test cases have data
if (test.cases.some(testCase => testCase.inputs!.some(input => !input.data || !input.dims))) {
throw new Error(`Test cases for test: ${test.name} [${
test.operator}] must have data for each inputs when inputShapeDefinitions is 'rankOnly'`);
}
// if inputShapeDefinitions is 'static', use the shape of the first test case for all inputs.
normalizedInputShapeDefinitions = test.cases[0].inputs!.map((input: Test.TensorValue) => input.dims);
// check if all test cases have the same shape for each inputs
if (test.cases.some(
testCase => testCase.inputs!.some(
(input: Test.TensorValue, i) => TensorResultValidator.integerEqual(
input.dims, (test.cases[0].inputs![i] as Test.TensorValue).dims)))) {
throw new Error(`Test cases for test: ${test.name} [${
test.operator}] must have the same shape for each inputs in different test cases`);
}
} else {
// if inputShapeDefinitions is specified as an array, use it as is.
// check if inputShapeDefinitions has the same number of inputs as test cases
if (test.inputShapeDefinitions && test.inputShapeDefinitions.length !== inputCount) {
throw new Error(
`Input shape definitions for test: ${test.name} [${test.operator}] must have the same number of inputs`);
}
normalizedInputShapeDefinitions = test.inputShapeDefinitions;
}
model.graph.input = test.cases[0].inputs!.map((input, i) => {
const shapeDefinition = normalizedInputShapeDefinitions[i];
const shape = shapeDefinition ? onnx.TensorShapeProto.create({
dim: shapeDefinition.map(
dim => onnx.TensorShapeProto.Dimension.create(typeof dim === 'string' ? {dimParam: dim} : {dimValue: dim}))
}) :
undefined;
return onnx.ValueInfoProto.create({
name: `input_${i}`,
type: onnx.TypeProto.create({
tensorType: onnx.TypeProto.Tensor.create({elemType: tensorDataTypeStringToEnum(input.type), shape}),
}),
});
});
model.graph.output = test.cases[0].outputs!.map((output, i) => onnx.ValueInfoProto.create({
name: `output_${i}`,
type: onnx.TypeProto.create({
tensorType: onnx.TypeProto.Tensor.create({elemType: tensorDataTypeStringToEnum(output.type)}),
}),
}));
model.graph.name = test.name;
this.backendHint = test.backend!;
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
this.ioBindingMode = test.ioBinding;
this.loadedData = onnx.ModelProto.encode(model).finish().slice();
// in debug mode, open a new tab in browser for the generated onnx model.
if (ort.env.debug) {
const modelFile =
new File([this.loadedData], `op_test_generated_model_${test.name}.onnx`, {type: 'application/octet-stream'});
const modelTempUrl = URL.createObjectURL(modelFile);
const a = document.createElement('a');
a.href = modelTempUrl;
a.download = modelFile.name;
a.target = '_blank';
a.click();
URL.revokeObjectURL(modelTempUrl);
}
}
async init(): Promise<void> {
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
this.session = await ort.InferenceSession.create(this.loadedData, {
executionProviders: [this.backendHint],
preferredOutputLocation: this.ioBindingMode === 'gpu-location' ? ('gpu-buffer' as const) : undefined,
...this.sessionOptions
});
}
async dispose(): Promise<void> {
await this.session.release();
}
}
async function runProtoOpTestcase(
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
session: ort.InferenceSession, testCase: Test.OperatorTestCase, ioBindingMode: Test.IOBindingMode,
validator: TensorResultValidator): Promise<void> {
const feeds: Record<string, ort.Tensor> = {};
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
const fetches: Record<string, Pick<ort.Tensor, 'dims'|'type'>> = {};
testCase.inputs.forEach((input, i) => {
if (input.data) {
let data: number[]|BigUint64Array|BigInt64Array = input.data;
if (input.type === 'uint64') {
data = BigUint64Array.from(input.data.map(BigInt));
} else if (input.type === 'int64') {
data = BigInt64Array.from(input.data.map(BigInt));
}
feeds[`input_${i}`] = new ort.Tensor(input.type, data, input.dims);
}
});
const outputs: ort.Tensor[] = [];
const expectedOutputNames: string[] = [];
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
testCase.outputs.forEach((output, i) => {
if (output.data) {
let data: number[]|BigUint64Array|BigInt64Array = output.data;
if (output.type === 'uint64') {
data = BigUint64Array.from(output.data.map(BigInt));
} else if (output.type === 'int64') {
data = BigInt64Array.from(output.data.map(BigInt));
}
outputs.push(new ort.Tensor(output.type, data, output.dims));
expectedOutputNames.push(`output_${i}`);
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
fetches[`output_${i}`] = {dims: output.dims, type: output.type};
}
});
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
const [, , results] = await sessionRun({session, feeds, outputsMetaInfo: fetches, ioBinding: ioBindingMode});
const actualOutputNames = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(results);
expect(actualOutputNames.length).to.equal(expectedOutputNames.length);
expect(actualOutputNames).to.have.members(expectedOutputNames);
const actualOutputs = actualOutputNames.map(name => results[name]);
validator.checkApiTensorResult(actualOutputs, outputs);
}
function createTensor(dims: number[], type: Tensor.DataType, data: number[]): Tensor {
const tensor = new Tensor(dims, type);
for (let i = 0; i < data.length; ++i) {
tensor.data[i] = data[i];
}
return tensor;
}
async function runOpTestcase(
inferenceHandler: InferenceHandler, operator: Operator, testcase: Test.OperatorTestCase,
validator: TensorResultValidator): Promise<void> {
testcase.inputs.forEach((input: Test.TensorValue, i) => {
Logger.verbose('TestOpRunner', ` Input '${i}': ${input.type}[${input.dims.join(',')}]`);
});
const inputTensors = testcase.inputs.map(
(input: Test.TensorValue) => createTensor(input.dims, input.type as Tensor.DataType, input.data));
const results = operator.impl(inferenceHandler, inputTensors, operator.context);
[js/web] WebGPU backend via JSEP (#14579) ### Description This change introduced the following new components into ONNX Runtime Web: - JavaScript Execution Provider (JSEP) - Asynchronized inferencing execution powered by Emscripten's Asyncify - WebGPU backend implemented in TypeScript - initial implementation of kernels: - elementwise operators (22) - binary operators (5) - tensor: Shape, Reshape, Transpose, Gemm - nn: Conv, {Global}Maxpool, {Global}AveragePool Code need to be polished. still working on it. ## Q&A What is JSEP? > JSEP, aka JavaScript Execution Provider, is a new ONNXRuntime execution provider that specifically works on Web environment (browsers). JSEP allows JavaScript code to kick in from various places when ONNX Runtime inferences a model. Why JSEP? > JSEP is a hybrid mode EP that contains both C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript implementation. There are 2 strong reasons why we introduces JSEP: > 1. the C/C++ part helps JSEP to leverage ONNX Runtime's capabilities as much as possible including graph transformer, optimizers and also the capabilities to fallback to CPU EP. TypeScript/JavaScript helps JSEP to develop and debug much easier in the browser for the kernel implementation. > 2. the requirement of asynchronized execution from JavaScript API (eg. `buffer.mapAsync()`) makes it impossible to run `OrtRun()` in a synchronized context (see "async problem" section below). This is done by using Emscripten's Asyncify. What is WebGPU? > WebGPU is the new GPU API that available in browser. It's one of the only 2 APIs that currently available to access the GPU from browser (the other is WebGL). > WebGPU is designed with more advanced and stronger features comparing to WebGL and is potentially solution that offer the best GPU performance for model inferencing that currently available. What is the async problem and why we have the problem? > The "async problem" is a problem that you cannot call an async function in a synchronous context. Think about the following C++ code: > ```c > // C-style declarations (API) > typedef void (*ON_COMPLETE)(PVOID state, DATA *data); > void read_data_from_file(FILEHANDLE file, ON_COMPLETE on_complete); > > // implementation > DATA * my_impl_read_data_from_file_sync(FILEHANDLE file) { > // how to implement? > } > ``` > The answer is, it's impossible to implement this function. Usually we try to find a sync version API, or launch a thread to call the async function and sync-wait on the main thread. Unfortunately, in browser environment, neither is possible. > > WebGPU does not offer any synchronized API for data downloading (GPU to CPU). This is the only operation that MUST be async. As `OrtRun()` will eventually call into DataTransfer for copy data from GPU to CPU, and `OrtRun()` is a synchronized function, this cannot be done in normal way. What is Emscripten? How is the Asyncify feature resolved the problem? > Emscripten is the C/C++ compiler for WebAssembly. It's what we use to compile ORT and generates the WebAssembly artifacts which runs on browsers. > > Asyncify is a [compiler feature](https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/asyncify.html) that allows calling async functions from a synchronized context. In short, it generates code to unwind and rewind call stack to emulate async execution. With this feature, we are able to call the async function inside `OrtRun()` call. ## Design Overview **Inter-op** JSEP is doing pretty much same thing to just another EP. It exposes an interface for inter-op with JavaScript, which is defined in onnxruntime/wasm/js_internal_api.js: ```js // init JSEP Module["jsepInit"] = function (backend, alloc, free, copy, copyAsync, createKernel, releaseKernel, run) { Module.jsepBackend = backend; Module.jsepAlloc = alloc; Module.jsepFree = free; Module.jsepCopy = copy; Module.jsepCopyAsync = copyAsync; Module.jsepCreateKernel = createKernel; Module.jsepReleaseKernel = releaseKernel; Module.jsepRun = run; }; ``` This simple JavaScript snippet defines all language barrier level functions that requires by JSEP to achieve implementing kernels and data transfers using JavaScript inside ONNX Runtime: - `jsepBackend`: assign the singleton object to webassembly module - `jsepAlloc` and `jsepFree`: implementation of data transfer's Alloc() and Free() - `jsepCopy`: synchronized copy ( GPU to GPU, CPU to GPU) - `jsepCopyAsync`: asynchronized copy ( GPU to CPU) - `jsepCreateKernel` and `jsepReleaseKernel`: a corresponding object that maintained in JS to match lifecycle of Kernel in ORT - `jsepRun`: OpKernel::Compute() should call into this The abstraction above allows to tie as little as possible connections and dependencies between C/C++ and TypeScript/JavaScript. **Resource Management** Lifecycle of tensor data and kernels are managed by ORT(C/C++) but the implementation are left to JavaScript. JavaScript code are responsible to implement the callbacks correctly. For WebGPU, the GPU data is managed by JavaScript using a singleton map (tensot_data_id => GPUBuffer). GPU pipeline is managed as singleton. Shaders are managed using a singletonmap (shader_key => gpu_program), while shader_key is generated by cache_key (OP specific, including attributes) and input shapes. **about data transfer** `js::DataTransfer::CopyTensor` implemented to call either synchronized or asynchronized copy callback, depending on the destination is GPU or not. Emscripten's macro `EM_ASYNC_JS` is used to wrap the async function to be called in the synchronized context. **run kernel in JS** Kernel class constructor calls once `jsepCreateKernel()` with an optional per-kernel specific serialization to pass attributes into JavaScript. `Compute()` are implemented in a way that a metadata serialization is performed in a base class and JavaScript code can access the data using the Emscripten specific builtin macro `EM_ASM_*`. **disabled features** memory pattern is force disabled, because the WebGPU data is not presented by a general memory model (a buffer can be represented by offset + size). concurrent run support is disabled. WebGPU is stateful and it also has async function call. To support concurrent run will significantly increase the complexity and we don't get any real benefit from it. **prefer channels last** JSEP prefers channels last and returns `DataLayout::NHWC` in method `GetPreferredLayout()`. This will let the graph transformers to preprocess the graph into a channels last form so that a more optimized WebGPU shader can be used. **Testing code** It's impossible to test JSEP directly because JSEP itself does not contain any kernel implementation. However, it has the kernel registration which need to work together with the corresponding JavaScript code. There are unit tests that run onnx models from JavaScript API. --------- Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <skottmckay@gmail.com>
2023-04-24 22:21:18 +00:00
// try async data read.
for (const result of results) {
try {
await result.getData();
} catch {
}
}
results.forEach((output, i) => {
Logger.verbose('TestOpRunner', ` Result'${i}': ${output.type}[${output.dims.join(',')}]`);
});
const expectedTensors = testcase.outputs.map(
(output: Test.TensorValue) => createTensor(output.dims, output.type as Tensor.DataType, output.data));
validator.checkTensorResult(results, expectedTensors);
}
/**
* run a single operator test case.
*/
export async function runOpTest(
testcase: Test.OperatorTestCase, context: ProtoOpTestContext|OpTestContext): Promise<void> {
if (context instanceof ProtoOpTestContext) {
[js/webgpu] support IO binding (#17480) <del> **This PR is based on a few prerequisites PRs. They are listed as below:** - #17465 - #17469 - #17470 - #17472 - #17473 - #17484 Please review the current change by only looking at commit e2e6623e673ec6de55a5c1f8edcbd3a46b535a89 and later. </del> ### Description This PR introduces WebGPU IO binding. This new feature allows onnxruntime-web users to use tensors created from GPU as model input/output so that a model inferencing can be done without unnecessary data copy between CPU and GPU for model input/output. ### Examples An E2E demo/example is being worked on. Following is some simple demo with code snippet. Let's first check today how we do: ```js // STEP.1 - create an inference session: const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'] }); // STEP.2 - create model input: (supposing myImageCpuData is a Float32Array) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': new ort.Tensor('float32', myImageCpuData, [1, 224, 224, 3]) }; // STEP.3 - run model const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds); // STEP.4 - get output data const myData = myResults['output_image:0'].data; // Float32Array ``` #### for inputs (GPU tensor): Now, with IO binding, you can create a tensor from a GPU buffer, and feed it to the model: ```js // new STEP.2.A - create model input from a GPU buffer: (supposing myInputGpuBuffer is a `GPUBuffer` object with input data) const feeds = { 'input_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myInputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 224, 224, 3] }) }; ``` ### for outputs (pre-allocated GPU tensor) you can also do that for output, **if you know the output shape**: ```js // new STEP.2.B - create model output from a GPU buffer: (supposing myOutputGpuBuffer is a pre-allocated `GPUBuffer` object) const fetches = { 'output_image:0': ort.Tensor.fromGpuBuffer(myOutputGpuBuffer, { dataType: 'float32', dims: [1, 512, 512, 3] }) }; // new STEP.3 - run model with pre-allocated output (fetches) const myResults = await mySession.run(feeds, fetches); ``` ### for outputs (specify location) if you do not know the output shape, you can specify the output location when creating the session: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: "gpu-buffer" }); ``` if the model has multiple outputs, you can specify them seperately: ```js // new STEP.1 - create an inference session with an option "preferredOutputLocation": const mySession = await ort.InferenceSession.create('./my_model.onnx', { executionProviders: ['webgpu'], preferredOutputLocation: { "output_image:0": "gpu-buffer" } }); ``` now you don't need to prepare the `fetches` object and onnxruntime-web will prepare output data on the location that specified. #### read data when you get the output tensor, you can: ```js // get the gpu buffer object: const gpuBuffer = myOutputTensor.gpuBuffer; // GPUBuffer // get the CPU data asynchronizely const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(); // get the CPU data asynchronizely and release the underlying GPU resources const cpuData = await myOutputTensor.getData(true); // dispose the tensor (release the underlying GPU resources). This tensor object will be invalid after dispose() is called. myOutputTensor.dispose(); ``` #### resource management JavaScript has GC so you don't need to worry about managing JavaScript objects. But there are 2 types of resources that are not managed by GC: - GPU buffer that used in tensors - Underlying ORT native resources To simplify, most of the unmanaged resources and handled inside ORT web. But there are a few resources that need users to manage: - All external GPU resources, including GPU buffers inside all tensors created by `Tensor.fromGpuBuffer()`, will not be managed by ORT. User should manage those GPU buffers themselves. - When a session is created with `preferredOutputLocation` == "gpu-buffer" specified in session options, and the corresponding output is not pre-allocated, user need to call the output tensor's `dispose()` or `getData(true)` to manually release the underlying GPU buffers. - ORT internal errors (including providing a pre-allocated output tensor with wrong type/dims) will invalidate the whole wasm memory and is not recoverable. An exception is thrown in this situation.
2023-09-29 18:24:42 +00:00
await runProtoOpTestcase(
context.session, testcase, context.ioBindingMode, new TensorResultValidator(context.backendHint));
} else {
await runOpTestcase(
context.inferenceHandler, context.createOperator(), testcase, new TensorResultValidator(context.backendHint));
}
}