saymrwulf/ltl-accumulator-verified
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/saymrwulf/ltl-accumulator-verified.git synced 2026-09-04 20:03:44 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
No description
14 commits 1 branch 0 tags 2.7 MiB
Shell 54.1%
Lean 36%
Python 9.9%
Find a file
mrwulf f47663b890 S5.3 drill (2nd pass): anchor refactor-equivalence provenance to git history 
The previous drill's equivalence theorems were only as strong as their
RHS matching the ACTUAL historical base (not a from-memory
reconstruction) and 'nothing else changed' being true. Both now verified
against the repository itself: git show cfde9b2 confirms the RHS forms
verbatim; git diff cfde9b2..8795e82 confirms the refactor is base-only
(eight lines). Provenance recorded in Refactor.lean's header so the
argument is self-contained: unchanged remainder (git) + equal base
(kernel) => whole-function equality. 26 certs green. LTL untouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-11 19:55:38 +02:00
verification S5.3 drill (2nd pass): anchor refactor-equivalence provenance to git history 2026-07-11 19:55:38 +02:00
README.md S5.3: consRecBinding PROVEN — Theorem 3 steps 1-2 kernel-checked (the hardest object) 2026-07-11 19:18:26 +02:00

README.md

ltl-accumulator-verified

Lean 4 mechanization of the security analysis (§6) of the paper "The Lean Transparency Log" (https://ltl.zkdefi.org/paper): the Merkle accumulator's own correctness and soundness theorems, kernel-checked, in the same discipline as the four *-ed25519-verified subject corpora.

Status: layer scaffold (work in progress — honest ledger below)

layer content status
L1 bytes, hleaf/hnode, domain separation (Lemma 1) done (domsep: axiom-free)
L2 MTH, Root, ConsRec definitions + termination done (cones: propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound)
L3 inclusion completeness (Theorem 1) done (incl_complete: propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound)
L4 frontier binding content (Lemma 2) inlined in the extractor walk (extractIncl); standalone receipt-uniqueness theorem queued for S4 restoration in extractor form
L5 inclusion soundness = EXPLICIT extractor extractIncl (Theorem 2) done, non-vacuous
L6a descent extractor extractMTH (Theorem 3 step 3 = Lemma 2, WHOLE-TREE instance) done, non-vacuous
— Lemma 2, PATH instance (receipt-uniqueness of Root): deleted with the vacuous root_binding in S3.5 and not yet restored; optional, not needed for Theorem 3
L6b ConsRec binding + Theorem 3 assembly (extractCons) in progress (S5): stage-1 arithmetic/list infrastructure done (kbelow_prefix_eq, take surgery); stage-1 infra + extractConsNode extractor DEFINED (faithful to ConsRec by inspection — NOT yet machine-checked); consRecBinding PROVEN (Theorem 3 steps 1-2, kernel-checked, no sorry); extractCons assembly (step 3 join) = S5.4
L6 pin-store state machine safety (Proposition 1) pending

Discipline (identical to the subject corpora)

  • verification/Proofs/ contains ZERO axiom declarations; the single sanctioned axiom site is verification/gen/ — here, one opaque function: SHA-256. The theorems are constructive collision extractors, so collision resistance is never assumed, only interpreted.
  • verification/check.sh is THE button: compiles every file through lean-guard (memory cap, core pinning, timeout, single-flight lock) and axiom-audits every certificate against its documented exact cone.
  • Expected boundary: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound plus LTLAcc.sha256 for hash-touching certificates — documented per certificate in check.sh, audited both directions.

The finished certificates are destined for the LTL itself as attestation leaves: the log carrying kernel-checked proofs of its own machinery.