No description
Find a file
mrwulf e270872a27 S3.5: explicit collision extractor — Theorem 2 made non-vacuous, vacuous forms removed
The S3 Socratic re-audit found incl_sound was kernel-perfect but VACUOUS:
its '... ∨ HasCollision' disjunct (∃ x y, x≠y ∧ sha256 x = sha256 y) is
provable by pigeonhole ALONE (sha256: infinite List UInt8 → finite
32-byte Hash), so the theorem said nothing about forgeries. Even a
data-carrying {p // IsCollision p} disjunct fails (Classical.choice
inhabits it). The only faithful rendering of the paper's 'explicit
algorithm 𝓔' is a NAMED FUNCTION whose correctness is a claim about ITS
OUTPUT.

- extractIncl (m D d P): total function that walks the honest tree and
  returns the concrete colliding preimage pair at the first divergence
  (a node preimage pair, or the leaf preimage pair at the bottom).
- extractIncl_correct: d ≠ D[m] ∧ accepting-receipt →
  IsCollision (extractIncl …).1 (extractIncl …).2. A statement ABOUT the
  fixed function's output; pigeonhole cannot discharge it.
  ADVERSARIAL CHECK (probe, since removed): proved
  ¬ IsCollision (extractIncl 0 [[7]] [7] []) — i.e. on a NON-forgery input
  the output is provably NOT a collision, so the conclusion is genuinely
  false for some inputs ⇒ non-vacuous, choice-proof.
- Removed the vacuous theorems entirely (incl_sound, root_binding,
  hnode/hleaf_inj_or_collision, HasCollision def) so no hollow statement
  survives in a corpus destined for the log. Kept the real building
  blocks (hnode_preimage_inj [propext]; eq_dropLast helper moved to
  Completeness; Binding.lean deleted).

extractIncl_correct cone [propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256,
Quot.sound]. THE button green (14 certs). Fable statement-audit passed.
LTL untouched (12 leaves, bcd15f9d).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-11 15:31:21 +02:00
verification S3.5: explicit collision extractor — Theorem 2 made non-vacuous, vacuous forms removed 2026-07-11 15:31:21 +02:00
README.md S3.5: explicit collision extractor — Theorem 2 made non-vacuous, vacuous forms removed 2026-07-11 15:31:21 +02:00

ltl-accumulator-verified

Lean 4 mechanization of the security analysis (§6) of the paper "The Lean Transparency Log" (https://ltl.zkdefi.org/paper): the Merkle accumulator's own correctness and soundness theorems, kernel-checked, in the same discipline as the four *-ed25519-verified subject corpora.

Status: layer scaffold (work in progress — honest ledger below)

layer content status
L1 bytes, hleaf/hnode, domain separation (Lemma 1) done (domsep: axiom-free)
L2 MTH, Root, ConsRec definitions + termination done (cones: propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound)
L3 inclusion completeness (Theorem 1) done (incl_complete: propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound)
L4 root binding for inclusion (Lemma 2, Path instance) done (root_binding; boundary = single sha256 axiom)
L5 inclusion soundness = EXPLICIT collision extractor extractIncl+correctness (Theorem 2) done, non-vacuous; consistency (Theorem 3) pending
L6 pin-store state machine safety (Proposition 1) pending

Discipline (identical to the subject corpora)

  • verification/Proofs/ contains ZERO axiom declarations; the single sanctioned axiom site is verification/gen/ — here, one opaque function: SHA-256. The theorems are constructive collision extractors, so collision resistance is never assumed, only interpreted.
  • verification/check.sh is THE button: compiles every file through lean-guard (memory cap, core pinning, timeout, single-flight lock) and axiom-audits every certificate against its documented exact cone.
  • Expected boundary: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound plus LTLAcc.sha256 for hash-touching certificates — documented per certificate in check.sh, audited both directions.

The finished certificates are destined for the LTL itself as attestation leaves: the log carrying kernel-checked proofs of its own machinery.