mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/ltl-accumulator-verified.git
synced 2026-09-03 19:53:48 +00:00
No description
Re-derived S5.3 (all done under an Opus switch) from zero. consRecBinding STATEMENT re-confirmed faithful to paper Thm 3 steps 1-2 (y=MTH D₁ = the hash-fold condition; some=>collision / none=>x=MTH(D₁.take n₀) = the two Lemma-2 outcomes); non-vacuous (some-branch is a SPECIFIC-pair IsCollision, not pigeonhole-provable; none-branch a real equality needing hcons). FINDING + FIX: Opus changed ConsRec's base definition (list-match → decidable if) with only 'recompiled clean' as evidence — a definition that mirrors the deployed verifier. Now machine-checked: consRec_base_ false_eq / consRec_base_true_eq prove the decidable-if base EQUALS the exact list-match forms it replaced. Kept as PERMANENT cone-audited theorems (F1 discipline: keep the evidence), not a throwaway probe. QUEUED for S5.4: extractCons_correct (Theorem 3 endpoint) MUST carry a permanent non-vacuity witness like extractIncl_nonvacuous/extractMTH_ nonvacuous. S7 must re-confirm the NEW ConsRec base vs Python. 26 certs green. LTL untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| verification | ||
| README.md | ||
ltl-accumulator-verified
Lean 4 mechanization of the security analysis (§6) of the paper
"The Lean Transparency Log" (https://ltl.zkdefi.org/paper): the Merkle
accumulator's own correctness and soundness theorems, kernel-checked, in
the same discipline as the four *-ed25519-verified subject corpora.
Status: layer scaffold (work in progress — honest ledger below)
| layer | content | status |
|---|---|---|
| L1 | bytes, hleaf/hnode, domain separation (Lemma 1) | done (domsep: axiom-free) |
| L2 | MTH, Root, ConsRec definitions + termination | done (cones: propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound) |
| L3 | inclusion completeness (Theorem 1) | done (incl_complete: propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound) |
| L4 | frontier binding content (Lemma 2) | inlined in the extractor walk (extractIncl); standalone receipt-uniqueness theorem queued for S4 restoration in extractor form |
| L5 | inclusion soundness = EXPLICIT extractor extractIncl (Theorem 2) done, non-vacuous |
|
| L6a | descent extractor extractMTH (Theorem 3 step 3 = Lemma 2, WHOLE-TREE instance) done, non-vacuous |
|
| — | Lemma 2, PATH instance (receipt-uniqueness of Root): deleted with the vacuous root_binding in S3.5 and not yet restored; optional, not needed for Theorem 3 |
|
| L6b | ConsRec binding + Theorem 3 assembly (extractCons) | in progress (S5): stage-1 arithmetic/list infrastructure done (kbelow_prefix_eq, take surgery); stage-1 infra + extractConsNode extractor DEFINED (faithful to ConsRec by inspection — NOT yet machine-checked); consRecBinding PROVEN (Theorem 3 steps 1-2, kernel-checked, no sorry); extractCons assembly (step 3 join) = S5.4 |
| L6 | pin-store state machine safety (Proposition 1) | pending |
Discipline (identical to the subject corpora)
verification/Proofs/contains ZEROaxiomdeclarations; the single sanctioned axiom site isverification/gen/— here, one opaque function: SHA-256. The theorems are constructive collision extractors, so collision resistance is never assumed, only interpreted.verification/check.shis THE button: compiles every file throughlean-guard(memory cap, core pinning, timeout, single-flight lock) and axiom-audits every certificate against its documented exact cone.- Expected boundary:
propext, Classical.choice, Quot.soundplusLTLAcc.sha256for hash-touching certificates — documented per certificate incheck.sh, audited both directions.
The finished certificates are destined for the LTL itself as attestation leaves: the log carrying kernel-checked proofs of its own machinery.