Adversarial statement-level re-verification of everything S2 shipped,
against paper SS5.3 and the deployed Python verifier: Path recursion,
Root_left/Root_right fold shapes (none exactly where the deployed code
rejects), incl_complete as Theorem 1 verbatim (getD default unreachable
under m < |D|), MTH([]) = H(epsilon) per RFC. All faithful.
One genuine gap found and closed: the kbelow lemmas bounded k but never
established k is a power of two, leaving 'our split point = the RFC
split point' as by-construction folklore. kbelow_pow2 (cone: propext,
Quot.sound) now pins it: 2^j = k < n <= 2k = 2^(j+1) uniquely
determines the RFC 9162 split. THE button green. LTL untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Path (prover-side inclusion path, paper SS5.3) with termination via the
kbelow bounds; self-contained list lemmas (getD_take, getD_drop - no
stdlib-name dependence); equation lemmas MTH_single/MTH_split/Root_one/
Root_left/Root_right (Option.map form; matcher side conditions closed
explicitly); Theorem 1 by functional induction on Path with a k-fold
discipline against the let-bound split point.
incl_complete cone: [propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256,
Quot.sound] - pinned exactly in check.sh alongside Path.
THE button green end to end. LTL untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
