Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
260ad64511 revision round 1: address both external reviews (GPT-5.6 + second Claude)
No theorem was wrong; every fix is spec-surface, audit-mechanism, docs,
or harness coverage. Changes:

LEAN (Claude F1, GPT M4):
- acceptIncl: the consumer's inclusion accept (m<n ∧ Root=some r) is now
  a named object, not just a theorem hypothesis. Root alone accepts
  out-of-range m; acceptIncl pins the guard.
- acceptIncl_complete / acceptIncl_sound: route Thm 1/2 through it.
- extractCons_correct_paper: Thm 3 at the paper's exact quantifiers
  (n₀≤n₁, no separate 0<n₀; n₀=0 discharged since D₀=[]=take 0).

SCRIPT (GPT H1/H2, Claude F3):
- Phase 3b: fail-closed audit-surface COVERAGE — every named decl under
  Proofs/ and gen/ must be in CONES or a documented EXCLUDE (sha256,
  Bytes); anonymous gen instances count-pinned; every CONES key must be
  queried by AxiomCheck (no pin-but-never-check). Tested: an
  unclassified theorem now makes the button exit 1.
- H2: distinct markers — LEAN GREEN always, ATTESTATION GREEN only when
  fidelity actually ran; SKIP/absent-pacta no longer emit the strong
  marker. Attestation gate keys on ATTESTATION GREEN.
- Phase 0: orphan-olean guard (every Proofs/*.olean needs a sibling
  .lean); deleted 6 orphans; untracked all *.olean/.lake from git and
  gitignored them (root cause of the F3 tarball leak).

HARNESS (Claude F1, GPT M3):
- added out-of-range families (m≥n, m>n, n₀>n₁, n₀=0); re-pinned counts
  230,271 / 230,016 (match the reviewer's independent RFC difftest
  exactly); narrowed 'exhaustive' wording to the tested domain.

DOCS: README stale rows fixed (freeze banner no longer contradicts
table); KNOWN-GAPS gap 3 reworded (general Lemma 2 = specializations),
+gaps 9 (cost), 10 (pin init), 11 (acceptIncl resolved); STATEMENT-MAP
+acceptIncl rows, +Lemma-2-general note, +constant-vs-property
clarification for §10(i).

Button: EXIT 0, coverage complete, ATTESTATION GREEN, 230,271/230,016.
56 pinned cones over an ENFORCED surface. LTL untouched (12, bcd15f9d).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-11 22:53:47 +02:00
67d9cfed43 S3.5 Fable re-audit: permanent non-vacuity witness + honest ledger
Adversarial re-derivation of S3.5 (drill after harness switch). Core
verdict CONFIRMED: extractIncl_correct is faithful and non-vacuous.
Three methodical flaws found and resolved:
- F1: the non-vacuity proof existed only as a deleted probe — evidence
  discarded. Now permanent: extractIncl_nonvacuous proves the
  extractor's output on a NON-forgery input is NOT a collision, so the
  correctness conclusion is false for some inputs and cannot be
  discharged by pigeonhole/choice. Guards against future drift back
  into vacuity. Cone pinned.
- F2 (queued for S4): deleting root_binding discarded the receipt-
  uniqueness content of Lemma 2 (left disjunct: P = Path m D) along
  with its vacuous disjunct. To be restored in extractor form during
  S4; the S4 consistency walk inlines the same argument regardless.
- F3: README still claimed 'root_binding done' — a deleted theorem
  advertised as delivered. Ledger corrected.

15 certs green. LTL untouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-11 16:38:34 +02:00
e270872a27 S3.5: explicit collision extractor — Theorem 2 made non-vacuous, vacuous forms removed
The S3 Socratic re-audit found incl_sound was kernel-perfect but VACUOUS:
its '... ∨ HasCollision' disjunct (∃ x y, x≠y ∧ sha256 x = sha256 y) is
provable by pigeonhole ALONE (sha256: infinite List UInt8 → finite
32-byte Hash), so the theorem said nothing about forgeries. Even a
data-carrying {p // IsCollision p} disjunct fails (Classical.choice
inhabits it). The only faithful rendering of the paper's 'explicit
algorithm 𝓔' is a NAMED FUNCTION whose correctness is a claim about ITS
OUTPUT.

- extractIncl (m D d P): total function that walks the honest tree and
  returns the concrete colliding preimage pair at the first divergence
  (a node preimage pair, or the leaf preimage pair at the bottom).
- extractIncl_correct: d ≠ D[m] ∧ accepting-receipt →
  IsCollision (extractIncl …).1 (extractIncl …).2. A statement ABOUT the
  fixed function's output; pigeonhole cannot discharge it.
  ADVERSARIAL CHECK (probe, since removed): proved
  ¬ IsCollision (extractIncl 0 [[7]] [7] []) — i.e. on a NON-forgery input
  the output is provably NOT a collision, so the conclusion is genuinely
  false for some inputs ⇒ non-vacuous, choice-proof.
- Removed the vacuous theorems entirely (incl_sound, root_binding,
  hnode/hleaf_inj_or_collision, HasCollision def) so no hollow statement
  survives in a corpus destined for the log. Kept the real building
  blocks (hnode_preimage_inj [propext]; eq_dropLast helper moved to
  Completeness; Binding.lean deleted).

extractIncl_correct cone [propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256,
Quot.sound]. THE button green (14 certs). Fable statement-audit passed.
LTL untouched (12 leaves, bcd15f9d).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-11 15:31:21 +02:00