diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 4ab5605..d49c0f5 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ the same discipline as the four `*-ed25519-verified` subject corpora.
 | L2 | MTH, Root, ConsRec definitions + termination | **done** (cones: propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound) |
 | L3 | inclusion completeness (Theorem 1) | **done** (incl_complete: propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound) |
 | L4 | root binding for inclusion (Lemma 2, Path instance) | **done** (root_binding; boundary = single sha256 axiom) |
-| L5 | inclusion soundness = collision extractor (Theorem 2) **done**; consistency (Theorem 3) pending |
+| L5 | inclusion soundness = EXPLICIT collision extractor extractIncl+correctness (Theorem 2) **done, non-vacuous**; consistency (Theorem 3) pending |
 | L6 | pin-store state machine safety (Proposition 1) | pending |
 
 ## Discipline (identical to the subject corpora)
diff --git a/verification/Proofs/AxiomCheck.lean b/verification/Proofs/AxiomCheck.lean
index 4480d1c..d918dc2 100644
--- a/verification/Proofs/AxiomCheck.lean
+++ b/verification/Proofs/AxiomCheck.lean
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /- Axiom-cone observation for the audit (Phase 3 of check.sh). -/
 import Proofs.Basic
 import Proofs.Completeness
-import Proofs.Binding
+import Proofs.Extract
 #print axioms LTLAcc.domsep
 #print axioms LTLAcc.kbelow_pos
 #print axioms LTLAcc.kbelow_lt
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ import Proofs.Binding
 #print axioms LTLAcc.Path
 #print axioms LTLAcc.incl_complete
 #print axioms LTLAcc.hnode_preimage_inj
-#print axioms LTLAcc.hnode_inj_or_collision
-#print axioms LTLAcc.hleaf_inj_or_collision
-#print axioms LTLAcc.root_binding
-#print axioms LTLAcc.incl_sound
+#print axioms LTLAcc.IsCollision
+#print axioms LTLAcc.extractIncl
+#print axioms LTLAcc.extractIncl_correct
diff --git a/verification/Proofs/AxiomCheck.olean b/verification/Proofs/AxiomCheck.olean
index cc18f98..beb1113 100644
Binary files a/verification/Proofs/AxiomCheck.olean and b/verification/Proofs/AxiomCheck.olean differ
diff --git a/verification/Proofs/Binding.lean b/verification/Proofs/Binding.lean
deleted file mode 100644
index 3e0308a..0000000
--- a/verification/Proofs/Binding.lean
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,185 +0,0 @@
-/- L4 (first instance) of the accumulator pyramid: **root binding for the
-   inclusion fold** — the Path instance of the paper's Lemma 2 — and
-   **Theorem 2 (inclusion soundness)** as a constructive statement:
-   an accepting receipt for a wrong leaf EXHIBITS a SHA-256 collision.
-
-   No collision-resistance assumption appears anywhere: `HasCollision`
-   is the conclusion, never a hypothesis. -/
-import Proofs.Completeness
-
-namespace LTLAcc
-
-/-- Two distinct preimages with equal hash — the jackpot. Constructively
-    exhibited by the soundness theorems; believing it cannot be found is
-    the reader's interpretation of SHA-256, exactly as in the paper. -/
-def HasCollision : Prop :=
-  ∃ x y : List UInt8, x ≠ y ∧ sha256 x = sha256 y
-
-/-- Either two hash values have equal preimage pairs, or their equality
-    is itself a collision (the paper's case dichotomy at one node). -/
-theorem hnode_inj_or_collision {x y X Y : Hash}
-    (h : hnode x y = hnode X Y) :
-    (x = X ∧ y = Y) ∨ HasCollision := by
-  by_cases hpre :
-      (0x01 : UInt8) :: (x.val ++ y.val) = 0x01 :: (X.val ++ Y.val)
-  · exact Or.inl (hnode_preimage_inj hpre)
-  · exact Or.inr ⟨_, _, hpre, h⟩
-
-/-- Likewise at a leaf: equal leaf hashes with distinct data collide. -/
-theorem hleaf_inj_or_collision {d e : Bytes}
-    (h : hleaf d = hleaf e) : d = e ∨ HasCollision := by
-  by_cases hde : d = e
-  · exact Or.inl hde
-  · refine Or.inr ⟨0x00 :: d, 0x00 :: e, ?_, h⟩
-    intro hc; injection hc with _ ht; exact hde ht
-
-/-- A non-empty list is its `dropLast` plus its last element
-    (self-contained; no stdlib-name dependence). -/
-theorem eq_dropLast_append_of_getLast? (l : List Hash) (s : Hash)
-    (h : l.getLast? = some s) : l = l.dropLast ++ [s] := by
-  induction l with
-  | nil => simp at h
-  | cons a t ih =>
-      cases t with
-      | nil =>
-          simp at h
-          subst h
-          rfl
-      | cons b u =>
-          have hh : (b :: u).getLast? = some s := by
-            simpa using h
-          have := ih hh
-          calc a :: b :: u = a :: (b :: u) := rfl
-            _ = a :: ((b :: u).dropLast ++ [s]) := by rw [← this]
-            _ = (a :: b :: u).dropLast ++ [s] := by simp
-
-/-- **Root binding** (the Path instance of the paper's Lemma 2): if any
-    reconstruction from `(v, P)` hits the honest root, then either
-    `(v, P)` IS the honest receipt — leaf hash and every consumed
-    sibling — or a collision is exhibited. -/
-theorem root_binding (m : Nat) (D : List Bytes) :
-    ∀ (v : Hash) (P : List Hash), m < D.length →
-    Root v m D.length P = some (MTH D) →
-    (v = hleaf (D.getD m []) ∧ P = Path m D) ∨ HasCollision := by
-  induction m, D using Path.induct with
-  | case1 m D hle =>
-      intro v P hm h
-      have h1 : D.length = 1 := by omega
-      obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_singleton_of_length_one D h1
-      have hm0 : m = 0 := by simpa using hm
-      subst hm0
-      have hlen : ([d] : List Bytes).length = 1 := rfl
-      rw [hlen] at h
-      cases P with
-      | nil =>
-          rw [Root_one, MTH_single] at h
-          simp only [Option.some.injEq] at h
-          left
-          refine ⟨?_, by rw [Path]; simp⟩
-          have hg : ([d] : List Bytes).getD 0 [] = d := rfl
-          rw [hg]; exact h
-      | cons p q =>
-          rw [Root_one_cons] at h
-          simp at h
-  | case2 m D hgt k hmk ih =>
-      intro v P hm h
-      have h2 : 2 ≤ D.length := by omega
-      have hkeq : k = kbelow D.length := rfl
-      have hkl : k < D.length := by rw [hkeq]; exact kbelow_lt D.length h2
-      have hmk' : m < kbelow D.length := by rw [← hkeq]; exact hmk
-      have htklen : (D.take k).length = k := by
-        simp [List.length_take]; omega
-      cases hP : P.getLast? with
-      | none =>
-          have hPnil : P = [] := by
-            cases P with
-            | nil => rfl
-            | cons a t => simp at hP
-          subst hPnil
-          rw [Root] at h
-          have hn1 : ¬ D.length = 1 := by omega
-          have hn0 : ¬ D.length = 0 := by omega
-          simp [hn1, hn0] at h
-      | some s =>
-          obtain hsplit := eq_dropLast_append_of_getLast? P s hP
-          rw [hsplit] at h
-          rw [Root_left _ _ _ _ _ h2 hmk', ← hkeq] at h
-          cases hR : Root v m k P.dropLast with
-          | none => rw [hR] at h; simp at h
-          | some x =>
-              rw [hR] at h
-              simp only [Option.map_some, Option.some.injEq] at h
-              rw [MTH_split D h2, ← hkeq] at h
-              rcases hnode_inj_or_collision h with ⟨hx, hs⟩ | hc
-              · have ihm : m < (D.take k).length := by omega
-                have hR' : Root v m (D.take k).length P.dropLast
-                    = some (MTH (D.take k)) := by rw [htklen, hR, hx]
-                rcases ih v P.dropLast ihm hR' with ⟨hv, hPd⟩ | hc
-                · left
-                  refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
-                  · rw [hv]; exact congrArg hleaf (getD_take D k m hmk)
-                  · have hRHS : Path m D = Path m (D.take k) ++ [MTH (D.drop k)] := by
-                      rw [Path]; simp only [if_neg hgt, ← hkeq, if_pos hmk]
-                    rw [hRHS, hsplit, hPd, hs]
-                · exact Or.inr hc
-              · exact Or.inr hc
-  | case3 m D hgt k hmk ih =>
-      intro v P hm h
-      have h2 : 2 ≤ D.length := by omega
-      have hkeq : k = kbelow D.length := rfl
-      have hkl : k < D.length := by rw [hkeq]; exact kbelow_lt D.length h2
-      have hkp : 0 < k := by rw [hkeq]; exact kbelow_pos D.length
-      have hmk' : ¬ m < kbelow D.length := by rw [← hkeq]; exact hmk
-      have hdplen : (D.drop k).length = D.length - k := by
-        simp [List.length_drop]
-      cases hP : P.getLast? with
-      | none =>
-          have hPnil : P = [] := by
-            cases P with
-            | nil => rfl
-            | cons a t => simp at hP
-          subst hPnil
-          rw [Root] at h
-          have hn1 : ¬ D.length = 1 := by omega
-          have hn0 : ¬ D.length = 0 := by omega
-          simp [hn1, hn0] at h
-      | some s =>
-          obtain hsplit := eq_dropLast_append_of_getLast? P s hP
-          rw [hsplit] at h
-          rw [Root_right _ _ _ _ _ h2 hmk', ← hkeq] at h
-          cases hR : Root v (m - k) (D.length - k) P.dropLast with
-          | none => rw [hR] at h; simp at h
-          | some x =>
-              rw [hR] at h
-              simp only [Option.map_some, Option.some.injEq] at h
-              rw [MTH_split D h2, ← hkeq] at h
-              rcases hnode_inj_or_collision h with ⟨hs, hx⟩ | hc
-              · have ihm : m - k < (D.drop k).length := by omega
-                have hR' : Root v (m - k) (D.drop k).length P.dropLast
-                    = some (MTH (D.drop k)) := by rw [hdplen, hR, hx]
-                rcases ih v P.dropLast ihm hR' with ⟨hv, hPd⟩ | hc
-                · left
-                  have hidx : k + (m - k) = m := by omega
-                  refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
-                  · rw [hv]
-                    have hh : (D.drop k).getD (m - k) [] = D.getD m [] := by
-                      rw [getD_drop, hidx]
-                    exact congrArg hleaf hh
-                  · have hRHS : Path m D = Path (m - k) (D.drop k) ++ [MTH (D.take k)] := by
-                      rw [Path]; simp only [if_neg hgt, ← hkeq, if_neg hmk]
-                    rw [hRHS, hsplit, hPd, hs]
-                · exact Or.inr hc
-              · exact Or.inr hc
-
-/-- **Theorem 2 (Inclusion soundness: position binding)**, paper §6,
-    constructive form: an accepting receipt whose leaf differs from the
-    honest leaf at position `m` exhibits a SHA-256 collision. -/
-theorem incl_sound (m : Nat) (D : List Bytes) (hm : m < D.length)
-    (d : Bytes) (P : List Hash)
-    (h : Root (hleaf d) m D.length P = some (MTH D)) :
-    d = D.getD m [] ∨ HasCollision := by
-  rcases root_binding m D (hleaf d) P hm h with ⟨hv, _⟩ | hc
-  · exact hleaf_inj_or_collision hv
-  · exact Or.inr hc
-
-end LTLAcc
diff --git a/verification/Proofs/Completeness.lean b/verification/Proofs/Completeness.lean
index 9d8ee43..e310ac0 100644
--- a/verification/Proofs/Completeness.lean
+++ b/verification/Proofs/Completeness.lean
@@ -161,4 +161,24 @@ theorem incl_complete (m : Nat) (D : List Bytes) (hm : m < D.length) :
       rw [hrec, MTH_split D h2, ← hkeq]
       rfl
 
+/-- A non-empty list is its `dropLast` plus its last element
+    (self-contained; no stdlib-name dependence). -/
+theorem eq_dropLast_append_of_getLast? (l : List Hash) (s : Hash)
+    (h : l.getLast? = some s) : l = l.dropLast ++ [s] := by
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons a t ih =>
+      cases t with
+      | nil =>
+          simp at h
+          subst h
+          rfl
+      | cons b u =>
+          have hh : (b :: u).getLast? = some s := by
+            simpa using h
+          have := ih hh
+          calc a :: b :: u = a :: (b :: u) := rfl
+            _ = a :: ((b :: u).dropLast ++ [s]) := by rw [← this]
+            _ = (a :: b :: u).dropLast ++ [s] := by simp
+
 end LTLAcc
diff --git a/verification/Proofs/Completeness.olean b/verification/Proofs/Completeness.olean
index d8d93f5..753fecc 100644
Binary files a/verification/Proofs/Completeness.olean and b/verification/Proofs/Completeness.olean differ
diff --git a/verification/Proofs/Extract.lean b/verification/Proofs/Extract.lean
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a9e017d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/verification/Proofs/Extract.lean
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+/- S3.5 — the EXPLICIT collision extractor for inclusion soundness.
+
+   Why a function and not `∃`: `Hash` is a finite type (32-byte lists),
+   `sha256` has an infinite domain, so `∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ sha256 x = sha256 y`
+   is provable by pigeonhole ALONE — a bare-existential soundness theorem
+   is vacuous, and even a data-carrying `{p // IsCollision p}` disjunct is
+   inhabited by `Classical.choice`. The paper's Theorem 2 is an *explicit
+   algorithm* 𝓔; faithfulness demands a named function `extractIncl` and a
+   correctness statement ABOUT ITS OUTPUT — a claim pigeonhole cannot
+   discharge, because it pins down *which* pair. -/
+import Proofs.Completeness
+
+namespace LTLAcc
+
+/-- A specific colliding pair (predicate on concrete byte strings). -/
+def IsCollision (x y : List UInt8) : Prop :=
+  x ≠ y ∧ sha256 x = sha256 y
+
+/-- The extractor 𝓔 for inclusion (paper Theorem 2). Given the honest
+    leaf list `D`, a claimed index `m`, a claimed leaf `d`, and a path
+    `P`, it walks the honest tree and returns the concrete preimage pair
+    at the first level where the offered reconstruction diverges from the
+    honest tree — a node preimage pair high up, or the leaf preimage pair
+    at the bottom. Total (junk defaults on the branches the soundness
+    hypothesis excludes). -/
+noncomputable def extractIncl (m : Nat) (D : List Bytes) (d : Bytes)
+    (P : List Hash) : List UInt8 × List UInt8 :=
+  if D.length ≤ 1 then
+    -- leaf level: the offered leaf `d` vs the honest leaf `D[m]`
+    (0x00 :: d, 0x00 :: D.getD m [])
+  else
+    let k := kbelow D.length
+    match P.getLast? with
+    | none => ([], [])            -- excluded: composite size needs a sibling
+    | some s =>
+        if m < k then
+          let child := (Root (hleaf d) m k P.dropLast).getD default
+          if child = MTH (D.take k) ∧ s = MTH (D.drop k) then
+            extractIncl m (D.take k) d P.dropLast
+          else
+            (0x01 :: (child.val ++ s.val),
+             0x01 :: ((MTH (D.take k)).val ++ (MTH (D.drop k)).val))
+        else
+          let child := (Root (hleaf d) (m - k) (D.length - k) P.dropLast).getD default
+          if s = MTH (D.take k) ∧ child = MTH (D.drop k) then
+            extractIncl (m - k) (D.drop k) d P.dropLast
+          else
+            (0x01 :: (s.val ++ child.val),
+             0x01 :: ((MTH (D.take k)).val ++ (MTH (D.drop k)).val))
+termination_by D.length
+decreasing_by
+  · simp only [List.length_take]
+    have h2 : 2 ≤ D.length := by omega
+    have hk := kbelow_lt D.length h2
+    omega
+  · simp only [List.length_drop]
+    have hp := kbelow_pos D.length
+    omega
+
+/-- **Theorem 2 (Inclusion soundness), explicit form** — the faithful
+    replacement for the vacuous bare-existential version. If an accepting
+    receipt opens position `m` to a leaf `d` different from the honest
+    `D[m]`, then `extractIncl` OUTPUTS a genuine SHA-256 collision. The
+    statement is about the fixed function's output, so pigeonhole cannot
+    prove it: it must exhibit that THIS pair collides. -/
+theorem extractIncl_correct (m : Nat) (D : List Bytes) :
+    ∀ (d : Bytes) (P : List Hash), m < D.length → d ≠ D.getD m [] →
+    Root (hleaf d) m D.length P = some (MTH D) →
+    IsCollision (extractIncl m D d P).1 (extractIncl m D d P).2 := by
+  induction m, D using Path.induct with
+  | case1 m D hle =>
+      intro d P hm hd h
+      have h1 : D.length = 1 := by omega
+      obtain ⟨e, rfl⟩ := exists_singleton_of_length_one D h1
+      have hm0 : m = 0 := by simpa using hm
+      subst hm0
+      rw [extractIncl]
+      simp only [List.length_singleton, if_pos (by omega : (1:Nat) ≤ 1)]
+      have hlen : ([e] : List Bytes).length = 1 := rfl
+      rw [hlen] at h
+      cases P with
+      | nil =>
+          rw [Root_one, MTH_single] at h
+          simp only [Option.some.injEq] at h
+          have hde : d ≠ e := by simpa using hd
+          refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
+          · intro hc; injection hc with _ ht; exact hde ht
+          · have hg : ([e] : List Bytes).getD 0 [] = e := rfl
+            rw [hg]; exact h
+      | cons p q =>
+          rw [Root_one_cons] at h
+          exact absurd h (by simp)
+  | case2 m D hgt k hmk ih =>
+      intro d P hm hd h
+      have h2 : 2 ≤ D.length := by omega
+      have hkeq : k = kbelow D.length := rfl
+      have hkl : k < D.length := by rw [hkeq]; exact kbelow_lt D.length h2
+      have hmk' : m < kbelow D.length := by rw [← hkeq]; exact hmk
+      have htklen : (D.take k).length = k := by simp [List.length_take]; omega
+      cases hP : P.getLast? with
+      | none =>
+          have hPnil : P = [] := by
+            cases P with
+            | nil => rfl
+            | cons a t => simp at hP
+          subst hPnil
+          rw [Root] at h
+          have hn1 : ¬ D.length = 1 := by omega
+          have hn0 : ¬ D.length = 0 := by omega
+          simp [hn1, hn0] at h
+      | some s =>
+          obtain hsplit := eq_dropLast_append_of_getLast? P s hP
+          have hh := h
+          rw [hsplit, Root_left _ _ _ _ _ h2 hmk', ← hkeq] at hh
+          cases hR : Root (hleaf d) m k P.dropLast with
+          | none => rw [hR] at hh; simp at hh
+          | some x =>
+              rw [hR] at hh
+              simp only [Option.map_some, Option.some.injEq] at hh
+              rw [MTH_split D h2, ← hkeq] at hh
+              rw [extractIncl]
+              simp only [if_neg hgt, hP, ← hkeq, if_pos hmk]
+              have hchild : (Root (hleaf d) m k P.dropLast).getD default = x := by
+                rw [hR]; rfl
+              rw [hchild]
+              by_cases hpair : x = MTH (D.take k) ∧ s = MTH (D.drop k)
+              · simp only [if_pos hpair]
+                have ihm : m < (D.take k).length := by omega
+                have hgetd : (D.take k).getD m [] = D.getD m [] := getD_take D k m hmk
+                have hd' : d ≠ (D.take k).getD m [] := by rw [hgetd]; exact hd
+                have hrec : Root (hleaf d) m (D.take k).length P.dropLast
+                    = some (MTH (D.take k)) := by rw [htklen, hR, hpair.1]
+                exact ih d P.dropLast ihm hd' hrec
+              · simp only [if_neg hpair]
+                refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
+                · intro hc
+                  injection hc with _ happ
+                  have hlen : x.val.length = (MTH (D.take k)).val.length := by
+                    rw [x.property, (MTH (D.take k)).property]
+                  obtain ⟨hx, hs⟩ := List.append_inj happ hlen
+                  exact hpair ⟨Subtype.ext hx, Subtype.ext hs⟩
+                · exact hh
+  | case3 m D hgt k hmk ih =>
+      intro d P hm hd h
+      have h2 : 2 ≤ D.length := by omega
+      have hkeq : k = kbelow D.length := rfl
+      have hkl : k < D.length := by rw [hkeq]; exact kbelow_lt D.length h2
+      have hkp : 0 < k := by rw [hkeq]; exact kbelow_pos D.length
+      have hmk' : ¬ m < kbelow D.length := by rw [← hkeq]; exact hmk
+      have hdplen : (D.drop k).length = D.length - k := by simp [List.length_drop]
+      cases hP : P.getLast? with
+      | none =>
+          have hPnil : P = [] := by
+            cases P with
+            | nil => rfl
+            | cons a t => simp at hP
+          subst hPnil
+          rw [Root] at h
+          have hn1 : ¬ D.length = 1 := by omega
+          have hn0 : ¬ D.length = 0 := by omega
+          simp [hn1, hn0] at h
+      | some s =>
+          obtain hsplit := eq_dropLast_append_of_getLast? P s hP
+          have hh := h
+          rw [hsplit, Root_right _ _ _ _ _ h2 hmk', ← hkeq] at hh
+          cases hR : Root (hleaf d) (m - k) (D.length - k) P.dropLast with
+          | none => rw [hR] at hh; simp at hh
+          | some x =>
+              rw [hR] at hh
+              simp only [Option.map_some, Option.some.injEq] at hh
+              rw [MTH_split D h2, ← hkeq] at hh
+              rw [extractIncl]
+              simp only [if_neg hgt, hP, ← hkeq, if_neg hmk]
+              have hchild : (Root (hleaf d) (m - k) (D.length - k) P.dropLast).getD default = x := by
+                rw [hR]; rfl
+              rw [hchild]
+              by_cases hpair : s = MTH (D.take k) ∧ x = MTH (D.drop k)
+              · simp only [if_pos hpair]
+                have ihm : m - k < (D.drop k).length := by omega
+                have hidx : k + (m - k) = m := by omega
+                have hgetd : (D.drop k).getD (m - k) [] = D.getD m [] := by
+                  rw [getD_drop, hidx]
+                have hd' : d ≠ (D.drop k).getD (m - k) [] := by rw [hgetd]; exact hd
+                have hrec : Root (hleaf d) (m - k) (D.drop k).length P.dropLast
+                    = some (MTH (D.drop k)) := by rw [hdplen, hR, hpair.2]
+                exact ih d P.dropLast ihm hd' hrec
+              · simp only [if_neg hpair]
+                refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
+                · intro hc
+                  injection hc with _ happ
+                  have hlen : s.val.length = (MTH (D.take k)).val.length := by
+                    rw [s.property, (MTH (D.take k)).property]
+                  obtain ⟨hs, hx⟩ := List.append_inj happ hlen
+                  exact hpair ⟨Subtype.ext hs, Subtype.ext hx⟩
+                · exact hh
+
+end LTLAcc
diff --git a/verification/Proofs/Extract.olean b/verification/Proofs/Extract.olean
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..92e2711
Binary files /dev/null and b/verification/Proofs/Extract.olean differ
diff --git a/verification/Proofs/Probe.olean b/verification/Proofs/Probe.olean
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b3d2e0b
Binary files /dev/null and b/verification/Proofs/Probe.olean differ
diff --git a/verification/check.sh b/verification/check.sh
index 18d627a..f6b8540 100755
--- a/verification/check.sh
+++ b/verification/check.sh
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ export LEAN_MEM_MB="${LEAN_MEM_MB:-4096}"
 CORES="${LEAN_MAX_CORES:-0-3}"
 
 GEN_MODULES=( LTLAcc/HashExternal )
-PROOFS=( Basic Completeness Binding )
+PROOFS=( Basic Completeness Extract )
 
 # Certificates and their exact expected cones (observed at first green
 # compile, 2026-07-10; any drift in EITHER direction is a failure).
@@ -33,10 +33,9 @@ declare -A CONES=(
   [LTLAcc.Path]="propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound"
   [LTLAcc.incl_complete]="propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound"
   [LTLAcc.hnode_preimage_inj]="propext"
-  [LTLAcc.hnode_inj_or_collision]="propext, LTLAcc.sha256"
-  [LTLAcc.hleaf_inj_or_collision]="LTLAcc.sha256"
-  [LTLAcc.root_binding]="propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound"
-  [LTLAcc.incl_sound]="propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound"
+  [LTLAcc.IsCollision]="LTLAcc.sha256"
+  [LTLAcc.extractIncl]="propext, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound"
+  [LTLAcc.extractIncl_correct]="propext, Classical.choice, LTLAcc.sha256, Quot.sound"
 )
 
 free -m | awk '/Mem:/{if($7<2048){print "FATAL: <2GB RAM available — refusing to compile"; exit 1}}'