mrwulf dce0473013 review round 5: bind the policy, the specification bodies, and the harness ... The third reviewer demonstrated that the round-4 gate was closed at the EXPLOITS, not the MECHANISMS: it bound the manifest rows while the things he moved sat outside the binding. Three fail-opens, each executed end-to-end with the button printing ALL GREEN. No theorem, proof, fold, or model body changed. NEW-1 — the policy constant was unbound. `manifestFingerprint` covered `manifest` but never `allowedBoundary`, the sole predicate the enumeration tests against; adding one name re-opened the False-proof with the committed fingerprint BYTE-IDENTICAL. NEW-2 — the specification bodies were unbound. The statement fingerprint pinned each certificate's TYPE, which names its reference fold; redefining that fold to *be* the extracted loop left cone and type-hash identical while the certificate degenerated to `loop = loop`. 100% of the fidelity content lives in those defs. NEW-3 — the harness was unbound. Stubbing verification/lean-guard alone, without touching check.sh or the proofs, gave ALL GREEN in 3.6s over destroyed proofs. FIX — one mechanism rather than three patches. Audit.lean now emits a canonical AUDIT-MANIFEST block and check.sh binds to its SHA-256. The block covers the POLICY constants, every certificate's fully-elaborated statement, and every specification constant transitively reachable from those statements with its fully-elaborated BODY (41 constants; the closure is computed, so a new fold cannot appear without moving the digest; Prop-valued constants contribute their statement, by proof irrelevance). This also retires the 32-bit Expr.hash as the binding (NEW-5) — it survives only as a per-certificate diagnostic. Enumeration now covers EVERY declaration kind (a `def : False` passed before) in the eight certificate modules AND in Audit.lean itself — the auditor is no longer exempt (round-5 R1). A bare `axiom` in audited scope is now an error. Phase 0 purges stale .olean (the verdict must depend on committed bytes, not .gitignored build state — NEW-4), forbids any .lean outside gen/ and Proofs/, and sha256-pins the four model files AND lean-guard. lean-guard is KEPT rather than removed (the reviewer's portability advice is declined by operator decision): it is the memory cap and machine-wide lock that protect the build machine after a 12.2GB OOM took the host down. That trade-off is documented. check.sh's "Certificates proven:" line now comes from the audited manifest; the hand-kept CERTS array — the one authoritative claim string nothing bound — is deleted. check-selftest.sh: 14 attacks, all rejected, plus a check that the hashed block literally carries the twelve fold bodies. Attacks 9-14 are the reviewers' and an independent drill's own exploits, turned into regression tests. DOCS. TRUSTED-BASE gains item 11 (the REAL trusted computing base — lean-guard pinned; check.sh, the toolchain env, $AENEAS_HOME, python3 and Lean still trusted) and item 12 (the apex does not compose the ten). README: the audit description rewritten; the XMSS sibling-order claim downgraded from "pins" to "makes visible", with a new blanket non-claim covering all ten loop certificates; the de-plumbing file claim corrected (round 1 touched only verify_mono.rs, round 2 only helpers.rs — which is ON the deployed verify AND sign paths, now disclosed; wots.rs was never patched). RECORDED-RUN: three lines that stood inside a fence were a hand-written summary, not console output — fabricated evidence in the file whose purpose is machine evidence. They are removed and the fabrication is named in place, together with the correction that the "INDEPENDENT RUN" block predates this gate. New rule: nothing goes in a fence unless captured with tee/cat, and every block states its date, pin, and who ran it. The transcripts added here follow it. Also disclosed rather than buried: three bugs in my own test harness this round (an olean-purge build-order break, an attack rejected by the wrong rule, and a coverage assertion looking on the wrong line) — each would have let an attack pass or fail for an unrelated reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>		2026-07-27 22:57:46 +02:00
..
SlhVerify	review round 5: bind the policy, the specification bodies, and the harness	2026-07-27 22:57:46 +02:00