mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/fips205-slhdsa-verified.git
synced 2026-09-03 19:53:49 +00:00
mrwulf
d44b70d806
Phase 2c-accounting asked one question with a name-keyed identity: is every kernel constant covered by the corpus inventory or the instrument surface? Keying on the name alone conflates that with a second, different question -- does the kernel attribute a declaration to the same module the walk does? Pair-keying the identity (module|name) was the obvious fix and is wrong: it fails on legitimate per-module duplicates. Lean materialises equation lemmas lazily, so each module forcing an unfold gets its own copy in its object file (GPT-5.6 round-7 F8). Those records differ from the walk only in module attribution, and every one of their names is accounted for elsewhere. So the block now asks both questions and reports them separately: coverage stays name-keyed and fail-closed, module attribution is counted and printed rather than suppressed. A divergence is now visible instead of either passing silently or failing for the wrong reason. The accumulator declines the second question and says why: its INV rows carry no module column (4 fields), so its records cannot be compared as pairs at all. Gating on the field count rather than on the row tag -- the shape of the record, not the spelling of its label. Adding that column is the open follow-up; until then the identity there is name-keyed only, which is weaker and now says so. Certified by the round-14 sweep: 50/50 green across all six repositories, both buttons and every self-test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| gen/SlhVerify | ||
| Proofs | ||
| AUDIT-MANIFEST.txt | ||
| check-selftest.sh | ||
| check.sh | ||
| drill.sh | ||
| driver-allowlist.txt | ||
| extract.sh | ||
| inventory-allowlist.txt | ||
| inventory_gate.sh | ||
| lean-guard | ||
| model-correspondence.py | ||
| MODEL-CORRESPONDENCE.txt | ||
| PROVENANCE.json | ||
| RECORDED-RUN.md | ||
| SlhVerify.llbc | ||