The prior post-flip drill itself ran in the suspect window, so this
pass re-executed every check independently.
CAUGHT (drill catch): the prior drill checked only the SUBJECT of
commit a2d8e5f and declared the message intact. The full body (%B)
shows a backticked fragment was eaten by bash command substitution
inside the double-quoted -m string: the body reads "exposing the
let-pair so" where it should read: exposing the let-pair
(o,iter1) := (some start, {start:=w,end:=stop}). No knowledge lost
(the committed ChainSpec header carries the full record, and now says
so explicitly); pushed history stays unrewritten per discipline.
HELD (all re-verified fresh, under lean-guard): worktree clean;
StepProbe absent from worktree and from ALL history; sorries exist
only in drafts/ChainSpec.lean (exactly 2, lines 83/103, zero errors);
check.sh references no draft and is GREEN; u32_succ / fwd_succ are
real statements (printed) and axiom-clean; match_ok_bind depends on
no axioms; local == remote.
Standing rules from this catch: (1) never put backticks in a
double-quoted git -m string - use -F with a quoted heredoc, as this
commit does; (2) a drill that verifies a commit message verifies %B,
never %s.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
mrwulf
8890beb159