curve25519-dalek-source/curve25519-dalek-derive/tests/tests.rs
Noa Resare e3b5328202
Fix curve25519-dalek-derive test compilation on CentOS 10 x86_64 (#756)
The test assumed that the 'avx2' target_feature would never be set
and used this fact to verify that unsafe_target_feature would
correctly not even compile test functions maked with that
target_feature. As of CentOS 10 and derivatives, th avx2
target_feature is now set by the system rustc, so let's use a
target_feature less likely to appear in the real world.

Closes #755
2025-05-26 08:24:17 -06:00

146 lines
3.4 KiB
Rust

#![cfg(any(target_arch = "x86", target_arch = "x86_64"))]
#![allow(dead_code)]
#![allow(unused_imports)]
use curve25519_dalek_derive::{unsafe_target_feature, unsafe_target_feature_specialize};
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
/// A doc comment.
fn function(a: u32, b: u32) -> u32 {
a - b
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
fn function_with_const_arg<const N: u32>(b: u32) -> u32 {
N - b
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
fn function_with_where_clause<T>(a: T, b: T) -> T::Output
where
T: Copy + core::ops::Sub,
{
a - b
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
#[rustfmt::skip]
fn function_with_rustfmt_skip() {}
struct Struct {
a: u32,
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
impl Struct {
#[allow(unused_mut)]
fn member_function(&self, mut b: u32) -> u32 {
self.a - b
}
fn member_function_with_const_arg<const N: u32>(self) -> u32 {
self.a - N
}
}
struct StructWithGenerics<T>
where
T: Copy + core::ops::Sub,
{
a: T,
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
impl<T> StructWithGenerics<T>
where
T: Copy + core::ops::Sub,
{
#[inline]
fn member_function(&self, b: T) -> T::Output {
self.a - b
}
}
struct StructWithGenericsNoWhere<T: Copy + core::ops::Sub> {
a: T,
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
impl<T: Copy + core::ops::Sub> StructWithGenericsNoWhere<T> {
#[inline(always)]
fn member_function(&self, b: T) -> T::Output {
self.a - b
}
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
#[allow(dead_code)]
impl<'a> From<&'a Struct> for () {
fn from(_: &'a Struct) -> Self {}
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
mod inner {
fn inner_function(a: u32, b: u32) -> u32 {
a - b
}
}
#[unsafe_target_feature_specialize("sse2", "avx2")]
mod inner_spec {
#[for_target_feature("sse2")]
const CONST: u32 = 1;
#[for_target_feature("avx2")]
const CONST: u32 = 2;
pub fn spec_function(a: u32, b: u32) -> u32 {
a - b - CONST
}
#[for_target_feature("sse2")]
const IS_AVX2: bool = false;
#[for_target_feature("avx2")]
const IS_AVX2: bool = true;
#[test]
fn test_specialized() {
assert!(!IS_AVX2);
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
#[test]
fn test_specialized_inner() {
assert!(!super::IS_AVX2);
}
}
}
#[unsafe_target_feature("sse2")]
#[test]
fn test_sse2_only() {}
// it turns out that for compilation to succeed, the feature needs be supported by rustc. For this
// test actually verify what happens when the target_feature is not enabled, this needs to be a
// pretty esoteric feature. Looking at the table of supported avx512 features at
// https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVX-512#CPUs_with_AVX-512 it seems avx512vp2intersect is one of the
// most unusual ones that has rustc knows about
#[unsafe_target_feature("avx512vp2intersect")]
#[test]
fn test_unset_target_feature() {
compile_error!("When an unknown target_feature is set on a test, unsafe_target_feature is expected remove the function");
}
#[test]
fn test_function() {
assert_eq!(function(10, 3), 7);
assert_eq!(function_with_where_clause(10, 3), 7);
assert_eq!(function_with_const_arg::<10>(3), 7);
assert_eq!(Struct { a: 10 }.member_function(3), 7);
assert_eq!(StructWithGenerics { a: 10 }.member_function(3), 7);
assert_eq!(StructWithGenericsNoWhere { a: 10 }.member_function(3), 7);
assert_eq!(inner_spec_sse2::spec_function(10, 3), 6);
assert_eq!(inner_spec_avx2::spec_function(10, 3), 5);
}