mirror of
https://github.com/saymrwulf/curve25519-dalek-source.git
synced 2026-09-04 20:24:10 +00:00
Extract Ristretto notes into a markdown file
This commit is contained in:
parent
ef0dae241a
commit
c841998b07
2 changed files with 329 additions and 320 deletions
318
docs/ristretto-notes.md
Normal file
318
docs/ristretto-notes.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
|
|||
Below are some notes on Ristretto, which are *NOT* a full writeup and which may have errors.
|
||||
|
||||
# Notes on Ristretto
|
||||
|
||||
## The Jacobi Quartic
|
||||
|
||||
The Jacobi quartic is parameterized by \\(e, A\\), and is of the
|
||||
form $$ \mathcal J\_{e,A} : t\^2 = es\^4 + 2As\^2 + 1, $$ with
|
||||
identity point \\((0,1)\\). For more details on the Jacobi quartic,
|
||||
see the [Decaf paper](https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/673.pdf) or
|
||||
[_Jacobi Quartic Curves
|
||||
Revisited_](https://eprint.iacr.org/2009/312.pdf) by Hisil, Wong,
|
||||
Carter, and Dawson).
|
||||
|
||||
When \\(e = a\^2\\), \\(\mathcal J\_{e,A}\\) has full
|
||||
\\(2\\)-torsion (i.e., \\(\mathcal J[2] \cong \mathbb Z /2 \times
|
||||
\mathbb Z/2\\)), and
|
||||
we can write the \\(\mathcal J[2]\\)-coset of a point \\(P =
|
||||
(s,t)\\) as
|
||||
$$
|
||||
P + \mathcal J[2] = \left\\{
|
||||
(s,t),
|
||||
(-s,-t),
|
||||
(1/as, -t/as\^2),
|
||||
(-1/as, t/as\^2) \right\\}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
Notice that replacing \\(a\\) by \\(-a\\) just swaps the last two
|
||||
points, so this set does not depend on the choice of \\(a\\). In
|
||||
what follows we require \\(a = \pm 1\\).
|
||||
|
||||
## Encoding \\(\mathcal J / \mathcal J[2]\\)
|
||||
|
||||
To encode points on \\(\mathcal J\\) modulo \\(\mathcal J[2]\\),
|
||||
we need to choose a canonical representative of the above coset.
|
||||
To do this, it's sufficient to make two independent sign choices:
|
||||
the Decaf paper suggests choosing \\((s,t)\\) with \\(s\\)
|
||||
non-negative and finite, and \\(t/s\\) non-negative or infinite.
|
||||
|
||||
The encoding is then the (canonical byte encoding of the)
|
||||
\\(s\\)-value of the canonical representative.
|
||||
|
||||
## The Edwards Curve
|
||||
|
||||
Our primary internal model for Curve25519 points are the [_Extended
|
||||
Twisted Edwards Coordinates_](https://eprint.iacr.org/2008/522.pdf)
|
||||
of Hisil, Wong, Carter, and Dawson.
|
||||
These correspond to the affine model
|
||||
|
||||
$$\mathcal E\_{a,d} : ax\^2 + y\^2 = 1 + dx\^2y\^2.$$
|
||||
|
||||
In projective coordinates, we represent a point as \\((X:Y:Z:T)\\)
|
||||
with $$XY = ZT, \quad aX\^2 + Y\^2 = Z\^2 + dT\^2.$$ (For more
|
||||
details on this model, see the documentation for the `edwards`
|
||||
module). The case \\(a = 1\\) is the _untwisted_ case; we only
|
||||
consider \\(a = \pm 1\\), and in particular we focus on the twisted
|
||||
Edwards form of Curve25519, which has \\(a = -1, d =
|
||||
-121665/121666\\). When not otherwise specified, we write
|
||||
\\(\mathcal E\\) for \\(\mathcal E\_{-1, -121665/121666}\\).
|
||||
|
||||
When both \\(d\\) and \\(ad\\) are nonsquare (which forces \\(a\\)
|
||||
to be square), the curve is *complete*. In this case the
|
||||
four-torsion subgroup is cyclic, and we
|
||||
can write it explicitly as
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\mathcal E\_{a,d}[4] = \\{ (0,1),\; (1/\sqrt a, 0),\; (0, -1),\; (-1/\sqrt{a}, 0)\\}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
These are the only points with \\(xy = 0\\); the points with \\( y
|
||||
\neq 0 \\) are \\(2\\)-torsion. The \\(\mathcal
|
||||
E\_{a,d}[4]\\)-coset of \\(P = (x,y)\\) is then
|
||||
$$
|
||||
P + \mathcal E\_{a,d}[4] = \\{ (x,y),\; (y/\sqrt a, -x\sqrt a),\; (-x, -y),\; (-y/\sqrt a, x\sqrt a)\\}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
Notice that if \\(xy \neq 0 \\), then exactly two of
|
||||
these points have \\( xy \\) non-negative, and they differ by the
|
||||
\\(2\\)-torsion point \\( (0,-1) \\). This means that we can select
|
||||
a representative modulo \\(\mathcal
|
||||
E\_{a,d}[2] \\) by requiring \\(xy\\) nonnegative and \\(y \neq
|
||||
0\\), and we can ensure this condition by conditionally adding a
|
||||
\\(4\\)-torsion point if \\(xy\\) is negative or \\(y = 0\\).
|
||||
|
||||
This procedure gives a canonical lift from \\(\mathcal E / \mathcal
|
||||
E[4]\\) to \\(\mathcal E / \mathcal E[2]\\). Since it involves a
|
||||
conditional rotation, we refer to it as *torquing* the point.
|
||||
|
||||
The structure of the Curve25519 group is \\( \mathcal E(\mathbb
|
||||
F\_p) \cong \mathbb Z / 8 \times \mathbb Z / \ell\\), where \\( \ell
|
||||
= 2\^{252} + \cdots \\) is a large prime. Because \\(\mathcal E[8]
|
||||
\cong \mathbb Z / 8\\), we have \\(\[2\](\mathcal E[8]) = \mathcal
|
||||
E[4]\\), \\(\mathcal E[4] \cong \mathbb Z / 4
|
||||
\\) and \\( \mathcal E[2] \cong \mathbb Z / 2\\). In particular
|
||||
this tells us that the group
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\frac{\[2\](\mathcal E)}{\mathcal E[4]}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
is well-defined and has prime order \\( (8\ell / 2) / 4 = \ell \\).
|
||||
This is the group we will construct using Ristretto.
|
||||
|
||||
## The Isogeny
|
||||
|
||||
For \\(a = \pm 1\\), we have a \\(2\\)-isogeny
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\theta\_{a,d} : \mathcal J\_{a\^2, -a(a+d)/(a-d)} \longrightarrow \mathcal E\_{a,d}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
(or simply \\(\theta\\)) defined by
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\theta\_{a,d} : (s,t) \mapsto \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{ad-1}} \cdot \frac{2s}{t},\quad \frac{1+as\^2}{1-as\^2} \right).
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
XXX Its dual is ... ?
|
||||
|
||||
The kernel of the isogeny is \\( \{(0, \pm 1)\} \\).
|
||||
The image of the isogeny is \\(\[2\](\mathcal E)\\). To see this,
|
||||
first note that because \\( \theta \circ \hat{\theta} = [2] \\), we
|
||||
know that \\( \[2\](\mathcal E) \subseteq \theta(\mathcal J)\\); then, to see that
|
||||
\\(\theta(\mathcal J)\\) is exactly \\(\[2\](\mathcal E)\\),
|
||||
recall that isogenous elliptic curves over a finite field have the
|
||||
same number of points (exercise 5.4 of Silverman), so that
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\\# \theta(\mathcal J) = \frac {\\# \mathcal J} {\\# \ker \theta}
|
||||
= \frac {\\# \mathcal E}{2} = \\# \[2\](\mathcal E).
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
To determine the image \\(\theta(\mathcal J[2])\\) of the
|
||||
\\(2\\)-torsion, we consider the image of the coset \\(\theta((s,t)
|
||||
+ \mathcal J[2])\\). Let \\((x,y) = \theta(s,t)\\); then
|
||||
\\(\theta(-s,-t) = (x,y)\\) and \\(\theta(1/as, -t/as\^2) = (-x,
|
||||
-y)\\), so that \\(\theta(\mathcal J[2]) = \mathcal E[2]\\).
|
||||
|
||||
The Decaf paper recalls that, for a group \\( G \\) with normal
|
||||
subgroup \\(G' \leq G\\), a group homomorphism \\( \phi : G
|
||||
\rightarrow H \\) induces a homomorphism
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\bar{\phi} : \frac G {G'} \longrightarrow \frac {\phi(G)}{\phi(G')} \leq \frac {H} {\phi(G')},
|
||||
$$
|
||||
and that the induced homomorphism \\(\bar{\phi}\\) is injective if
|
||||
\\( \ker \phi \leq G' \\). In our context, the kernel of
|
||||
\\(\theta\\) is \\( \\{(0, \pm 1)\\} \leq \mathcal J[2] \\),
|
||||
so \\(\theta\\) gives an isomorphism
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\frac {\mathcal J} {\mathcal J[2]}
|
||||
\cong
|
||||
\frac {\theta(\mathcal J)} {\theta(\mathcal J[2])}
|
||||
\cong
|
||||
\frac {\[2\](\mathcal E)} {\mathcal E[2]}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
We can use the isomorphism to transfer the encoding of \\(\mathcal
|
||||
J / \mathcal J[2] \\) defined above to \\(\[2\](\mathcal E)/\mathcal
|
||||
E[2]\\), by encoding the Edwards point \\((x,y)\\) using the Jacobi
|
||||
quartic encoding of \\(\theta\^{-1}(x,y)\\).
|
||||
|
||||
Since \\(\\# (\[2\](\mathcal E) / \mathcal E[2]) = (\\#\mathcal
|
||||
E)/4\\), if \\(\mathcal E\\) has cofactor \\(4\\), we're done.
|
||||
Otherwise, if \\(\mathcal E\\) has cofactor \\(8\\), as in the
|
||||
Curve25519 case, we use the torquing procedure to lift \\(\mathcal E
|
||||
/ \mathcal E[4]\\) to \\(\mathcal E / \mathcal E[2]\\), and then
|
||||
apply the encoding for \\( \[2\](\mathcal E) / \mathcal E[2] \\).
|
||||
|
||||
## The Ristretto Encoding
|
||||
|
||||
We can write the above encoding/decoding procedure concretely (in affine
|
||||
coordinates) as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
### Encoding
|
||||
|
||||
On input \\( (x,y) \in \[2\](\mathcal E)\\), a representative for a
|
||||
coset in \\( \[2\](\mathcal E) / \mathcal E[4] \\):
|
||||
|
||||
1. Check if \\( xy \\) is negative or \\( x = 0 \\); if so, torque
|
||||
the point by setting \\( (x,y) \gets (x,y) + P_4 \\), where
|
||||
\\(P_4\\) is a \\(4\\)-torsion point.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Check if \\(x\\) is negative or \\( y = -1 \\); if so, set
|
||||
\\( (x,y) \gets (x,y) + (0,-1) = (-x, -y) \\).
|
||||
|
||||
3. Compute $$ s = +\sqrt {(-a) \frac {1 - y} {1 + y} }, $$ choosing
|
||||
the positive square root.
|
||||
|
||||
The output is then the (canonical) byte-encoding of \\(s\\).
|
||||
|
||||
If \\(\mathcal E\\) has cofactor \\(4\\), we skip the first step,
|
||||
since our input already represents a coset in
|
||||
\\( \[2\](\mathcal E) / \mathcal E[2] \\).
|
||||
|
||||
To see that this corresponds to the encoding procedure above, notice
|
||||
that the first step lifts from \\( \mathcal E / \mathcal E[4] \\) to
|
||||
\\(\mathcal E / \mathcal E[2]\\). To understand steps 2 and 3,
|
||||
notice that the \\(y\\)-coordinate of \\(\theta(s,t)\\) is
|
||||
$$
|
||||
y = \frac {1 + as\^2}{1 - as\^2},
|
||||
$$
|
||||
so that the \\(s\\)-coordinate of \\(\theta\^{-1}(x,y)\\) has
|
||||
$$
|
||||
s\^2 = (-a)\frac {1-y}{1+y}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
Since
|
||||
$$
|
||||
x = \frac 1 {\sqrt {ad - 1}} \frac {2s} {t},
|
||||
$$
|
||||
we also have
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\frac s t = x \frac {\sqrt {ad-1}} 2,
|
||||
$$
|
||||
so that the sign of \\(s/t\\) is determined by the sign of \\(x\\).
|
||||
|
||||
Recall that to choose a canonical representative of \\( (s,t) +
|
||||
\mathcal J[2] \\), it's sufficient to make two sign choices: the
|
||||
sign of \\(s\\) and the sign of \\(s/t\\). Step 2 determines the
|
||||
sign of \\(s/t\\), while step 3 computes \\(s\\) and determines its
|
||||
sign (by choosing the positive square root). Finally, the check
|
||||
that \\(y \neq -1\\) prevents division-by-zero when encoding the
|
||||
identity; it falls out of the optimized formulas below.
|
||||
|
||||
### Decoding
|
||||
|
||||
On input `s_bytes`, decoding proceeds as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Decode `s_bytes` to \\(s\\); reject if `s_bytes` is not the
|
||||
canonical encoding of \\(s\\).
|
||||
|
||||
2. Check whether \\(s\\) is negative; if so, reject.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Compute
|
||||
$$
|
||||
y \gets \frac {1 + as\^2}{1 - as\^2}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
4. Compute
|
||||
$$
|
||||
x \gets +\sqrt{ \frac{4s\^2} {ad(1+as\^2)\^2 - (1-as\^2)\^2}},
|
||||
$$
|
||||
choosing the positive square root, or reject if the square root does
|
||||
not exist.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Check whether \\(xy\\) is negative or \\(y = 0\\); if so, reject.
|
||||
|
||||
## Encoding in Extended Coordinates
|
||||
|
||||
The formulas above are given in affine coordinates, but the usual
|
||||
internal representation is extended twisted Edwards coordinates \\(
|
||||
(X:Y:Z:T) \\) with \\( x = X/Z \\), \\(y = Y/Z\\), \\(xy = T/Z \\).
|
||||
Selecting the distinguished representative of the coset
|
||||
requires the affine coordinates \\( (x,y) \\), and computing \\( s
|
||||
\\) requires an inverse square root.
|
||||
As inversions are expensive, we'd like to be able to do this
|
||||
whole computation with only one inverse square root, by batching
|
||||
together the inversion and the inverse square root.
|
||||
|
||||
However, it is not obvious how to do this, since the inverse square
|
||||
root computation depends on the affine coordinates (which select the
|
||||
distinguished representative).
|
||||
|
||||
In what follows we consider only the case
|
||||
\\(a = -1\\); a similar argument applies to the case \\( a = 1\\).
|
||||
|
||||
Since \\(y = Y/Z\\), in extended coordinates the formula for \\(s\\) becomes
|
||||
$$
|
||||
s = \sqrt{ \frac{ 1 - Y/Z}{1+Y/Z}} = \sqrt{\frac{Z - Y}{Z+Y}}
|
||||
= \frac {Z - Y} {\sqrt{Z\^2 - Y\^2}}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
Here \\( (X:Y:Z:T) \\) are the coordinates of the distinguished
|
||||
representative of the coset.
|
||||
Write \\( (X\_0 : Y\_0 : Z\_0 : T\_0) \\)
|
||||
for the coordinates of the initial representative. Then the
|
||||
torquing procedure in step 1 replaces \\( (X\_0 : Y\_0 : Z\_0 :
|
||||
T\_0) \\) by \\( (iY\_0 : iX\_0 : Z\_0 : -T\_0) \\). This means we
|
||||
want to obtain either
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\frac {1} { \sqrt{Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2}}
|
||||
\quad \text{or} \quad
|
||||
\frac {1} { \sqrt{Z\_0\^2 + X\_0\^2}}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
We can relate these using the identity
|
||||
$$
|
||||
(a-d)X\^2Y\^2 = (Z\^2 - aX\^2)(Z\^2 - Y\^2),
|
||||
$$
|
||||
which is valid for all curve points. To see this, recall from the curve equation that
|
||||
$$
|
||||
-dX\^2Y\^2 = Z\^4 - aZ\^2X\^2 - Z\^2Y\^2,
|
||||
$$
|
||||
so that
|
||||
$$
|
||||
(a-d)X\^2Y\^2 = Z\^4 - aZ\^2X\^2 - Z\^2Y\^2 + aX\^2Y\^2 = (Z\^2 - Y\^2)(Z\^2 + X\^2).
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
The encoding procedure is as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
1. \\(u\_1 \gets (Z\_0 + Y\_0)(Z\_0 - Y\_0) = Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2 \\)
|
||||
2. \\(u\_2 \gets X\_0 Y\_0 \\)
|
||||
3. \\(I \gets \mathrm{invsqrt}(u\_1 u\_2\^2) = 1/\sqrt{X\_0\^2 Y\_0\^2 (Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2)} \\)
|
||||
4. \\(D\_1 \gets u\_1 I = \sqrt{(Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2)/(X\_0\^2 Y\_0\^2)} \\)
|
||||
5. \\(D\_2 \gets u\_2 I = \pm \sqrt{1/(Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2)} \\)
|
||||
6. \\(Z\_{inv} \gets D\_1 D\_2 T\_0 = (u\_1 u\_2)/(u\_1 u\_2\^2) T\_0 = T\_0 / X\_0 Y\_0 = 1/Z\_0 \\)
|
||||
7. If \\( T\_0 Z\_{inv} = x\_0 y\_0 \\) is negative:
|
||||
1. \\( X \gets iY\_0 \\)
|
||||
2. \\( Y \gets iX\_0 \\)
|
||||
3. \\( D \gets D\_1 / \sqrt{a-d} = 1/\sqrt{Z\_0\^2 + X\_0\^2} \\)
|
||||
8. Otherwise:
|
||||
1. \\( X \gets X\_0 \\)
|
||||
2. \\( Y \gets Y\_0 \\)
|
||||
3. \\( D \gets D\_2 = \pm \sqrt{1/(Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2)} \\)
|
||||
9. If \\( X Z\_{inv} = x \\) is negative, set \\( Y \gets - Y\\)
|
||||
10. Compute \\( s \gets (Z - Y) D = (Z - Y) / \sqrt{Z\^2 - Y\^2} \\) and return.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decoding to Extended Coordinates
|
||||
|
||||
## Equality Testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Elligator
|
||||
|
||||
## The Double-Ristretto Encoding
|
||||
|
||||
It's possible to do batch encoding of \\( [2]P \\) using the dual
|
||||
isogeny \\(\hat{\theta}\\). Defer this for now.
|
||||
|
||||
## ???
|
||||
331
src/ristretto.rs
331
src/ristretto.rs
|
|
@ -142,327 +142,18 @@
|
|||
//! [ristretto_notes]:
|
||||
//! https://doc-internal.dalek.rs/curve25519_dalek/ristretto/notes/index.html
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Conditionally include the Ristretto notes if:
|
||||
// - we're on nightly (so we can include docs at all)
|
||||
// - we're in stage 2 of the build.
|
||||
// The latter point prevents a really silly and annoying problem,
|
||||
// where the location of ".." is different depending on whether we're
|
||||
// building the crate for real, or whether we're in build.rs
|
||||
// generating the lookup tables (in which case we're relative to the
|
||||
// location of build.rs, not lib.rs, so the markdown file appears
|
||||
// missing).
|
||||
#[cfg_attr(all(feature = "nightly", feature="precomputed_tables"), doc(include = "../docs/ristretto-notes.md"))]
|
||||
mod notes {
|
||||
|
||||
//! Below are some notes on Ristretto, which are *NOT* a full writeup and which may have errors.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! # Notes on Ristretto
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## The Jacobi Quartic
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The Jacobi quartic is parameterized by \\(e, A\\), and is of the
|
||||
//! form $$ \mathcal J\_{e,A} : t\^2 = es\^4 + 2As\^2 + 1, $$ with
|
||||
//! identity point \\((0,1)\\). For more details on the Jacobi quartic,
|
||||
//! see the [Decaf paper](https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/673.pdf) or
|
||||
//! [_Jacobi Quartic Curves
|
||||
//! Revisited_](https://eprint.iacr.org/2009/312.pdf) by Hisil, Wong,
|
||||
//! Carter, and Dawson).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! When \\(e = a\^2\\), \\(\mathcal J\_{e,A}\\) has full
|
||||
//! \\(2\\)-torsion (i.e., \\(\mathcal J[2] \cong \mathbb Z /2 \times
|
||||
//! \mathbb Z/2\\)), and
|
||||
//! we can write the \\(\mathcal J[2]\\)-coset of a point \\(P =
|
||||
//! (s,t)\\) as
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! P + \mathcal J[2] = \left\\{
|
||||
//! (s,t),
|
||||
//! (-s,-t),
|
||||
//! (1/as, -t/as\^2),
|
||||
//! (-1/as, t/as\^2) \right\\}.
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! Notice that replacing \\(a\\) by \\(-a\\) just swaps the last two
|
||||
//! points, so this set does not depend on the choice of \\(a\\). In
|
||||
//! what follows we require \\(a = \pm 1\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Encoding \\(\mathcal J / \mathcal J[2]\\)
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! To encode points on \\(\mathcal J\\) modulo \\(\mathcal J[2]\\),
|
||||
//! we need to choose a canonical representative of the above coset.
|
||||
//! To do this, it's sufficient to make two independent sign choices:
|
||||
//! the Decaf paper suggests choosing \\((s,t)\\) with \\(s\\)
|
||||
//! non-negative and finite, and \\(t/s\\) non-negative or infinite.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The encoding is then the (canonical byte encoding of the)
|
||||
//! \\(s\\)-value of the canonical representative.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## The Edwards Curve
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Our primary internal model for Curve25519 points are the [_Extended
|
||||
//! Twisted Edwards Coordinates_](https://eprint.iacr.org/2008/522.pdf)
|
||||
//! of Hisil, Wong, Carter, and Dawson.
|
||||
//! These correspond to the affine model
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! $$\mathcal E\_{a,d} : ax\^2 + y\^2 = 1 + dx\^2y\^2.$$
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! In projective coordinates, we represent a point as \\((X:Y:Z:T)\\)
|
||||
//! with $$XY = ZT, \quad aX\^2 + Y\^2 = Z\^2 + dT\^2.$$ (For more
|
||||
//! details on this model, see the documentation for the `edwards`
|
||||
//! module). The case \\(a = 1\\) is the _untwisted_ case; we only
|
||||
//! consider \\(a = \pm 1\\), and in particular we focus on the twisted
|
||||
//! Edwards form of Curve25519, which has \\(a = -1, d =
|
||||
//! -121665/121666\\). When not otherwise specified, we write
|
||||
//! \\(\mathcal E\\) for \\(\mathcal E\_{-1, -121665/121666}\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! When both \\(d\\) and \\(ad\\) are nonsquare (which forces \\(a\\)
|
||||
//! to be square), the curve is *complete*. In this case the
|
||||
//! four-torsion subgroup is cyclic, and we
|
||||
//! can write it explicitly as
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \mathcal E\_{a,d}[4] = \\{ (0,1),\; (1/\sqrt a, 0),\; (0, -1),\; (-1/\sqrt{a}, 0)\\}.
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! These are the only points with \\(xy = 0\\); the points with \\( y
|
||||
//! \neq 0 \\) are \\(2\\)-torsion. The \\(\mathcal
|
||||
//! E\_{a,d}[4]\\)-coset of \\(P = (x,y)\\) is then
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! P + \mathcal E\_{a,d}[4] = \\{ (x,y),\; (y/\sqrt a, -x\sqrt a),\; (-x, -y),\; (-y/\sqrt a, x\sqrt a)\\}.
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! Notice that if \\(xy \neq 0 \\), then exactly two of
|
||||
//! these points have \\( xy \\) non-negative, and they differ by the
|
||||
//! \\(2\\)-torsion point \\( (0,-1) \\). This means that we can select
|
||||
//! a representative modulo \\(\mathcal
|
||||
//! E\_{a,d}[2] \\) by requiring \\(xy\\) nonnegative and \\(y \neq
|
||||
//! 0\\), and we can ensure this condition by conditionally adding a
|
||||
//! \\(4\\)-torsion point if \\(xy\\) is negative or \\(y = 0\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! This procedure gives a canonical lift from \\(\mathcal E / \mathcal
|
||||
//! E[4]\\) to \\(\mathcal E / \mathcal E[2]\\). Since it involves a
|
||||
//! conditional rotation, we refer to it as *torquing* the point.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The structure of the Curve25519 group is \\( \mathcal E(\mathbb
|
||||
//! F\_p) \cong \mathbb Z / 8 \times \mathbb Z / \ell\\), where \\( \ell
|
||||
//! = 2\^{252} + \cdots \\) is a large prime. Because \\(\mathcal E[8]
|
||||
//! \cong \mathbb Z / 8\\), we have \\(\[2\](\mathcal E[8]) = \mathcal
|
||||
//! E[4]\\), \\(\mathcal E[4] \cong \mathbb Z / 4
|
||||
//! \\) and \\( \mathcal E[2] \cong \mathbb Z / 2\\). In particular
|
||||
//! this tells us that the group
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \frac{\[2\](\mathcal E)}{\mathcal E[4]}
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! is well-defined and has prime order \\( (8\ell / 2) / 4 = \ell \\).
|
||||
//! This is the group we will construct using Ristretto.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## The Isogeny
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! For \\(a = \pm 1\\), we have a \\(2\\)-isogeny
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \theta\_{a,d} : \mathcal J\_{a\^2, -a(a+d)/(a-d)} \longrightarrow \mathcal E\_{a,d}
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! (or simply \\(\theta\\)) defined by
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \theta\_{a,d} : (s,t) \mapsto \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{ad-1}} \cdot \frac{2s}{t},\quad \frac{1+as\^2}{1-as\^2} \right).
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! XXX Its dual is ... ?
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The kernel of the isogeny is \\( \{(0, \pm 1)\} \\).
|
||||
//! The image of the isogeny is \\(\[2\](\mathcal E)\\). To see this,
|
||||
//! first note that because \\( \theta \circ \hat{\theta} = [2] \\), we
|
||||
//! know that \\( \[2\](\mathcal E) \subseteq \theta(\mathcal J)\\); then, to see that
|
||||
//! \\(\theta(\mathcal J)\\) is exactly \\(\[2\](\mathcal E)\\),
|
||||
//! recall that isogenous elliptic curves over a finite field have the
|
||||
//! same number of points (exercise 5.4 of Silverman), so that
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \\# \theta(\mathcal J) = \frac {\\# \mathcal J} {\\# \ker \theta}
|
||||
//! = \frac {\\# \mathcal E}{2} = \\# \[2\](\mathcal E).
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! To determine the image \\(\theta(\mathcal J[2])\\) of the
|
||||
//! \\(2\\)-torsion, we consider the image of the coset \\(\theta((s,t)
|
||||
//! + \mathcal J[2])\\). Let \\((x,y) = \theta(s,t)\\); then
|
||||
//! \\(\theta(-s,-t) = (x,y)\\) and \\(\theta(1/as, -t/as\^2) = (-x,
|
||||
//! -y)\\), so that \\(\theta(\mathcal J[2]) = \mathcal E[2]\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The Decaf paper recalls that, for a group \\( G \\) with normal
|
||||
//! subgroup \\(G' \leq G\\), a group homomorphism \\( \phi : G
|
||||
//! \rightarrow H \\) induces a homomorphism
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \bar{\phi} : \frac G {G'} \longrightarrow \frac {\phi(G)}{\phi(G')} \leq \frac {H} {\phi(G')},
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! and that the induced homomorphism \\(\bar{\phi}\\) is injective if
|
||||
//! \\( \ker \phi \leq G' \\). In our context, the kernel of
|
||||
//! \\(\theta\\) is \\( \\{(0, \pm 1)\\} \leq \mathcal J[2] \\),
|
||||
//! so \\(\theta\\) gives an isomorphism
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \frac {\mathcal J} {\mathcal J[2]}
|
||||
//! \cong
|
||||
//! \frac {\theta(\mathcal J)} {\theta(\mathcal J[2])}
|
||||
//! \cong
|
||||
//! \frac {\[2\](\mathcal E)} {\mathcal E[2]}.
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! We can use the isomorphism to transfer the encoding of \\(\mathcal
|
||||
//! J / \mathcal J[2] \\) defined above to \\(\[2\](\mathcal E)/\mathcal
|
||||
//! E[2]\\), by encoding the Edwards point \\((x,y)\\) using the Jacobi
|
||||
//! quartic encoding of \\(\theta\^{-1}(x,y)\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Since \\(\\# (\[2\](\mathcal E) / \mathcal E[2]) = (\\#\mathcal
|
||||
//! E)/4\\), if \\(\mathcal E\\) has cofactor \\(4\\), we're done.
|
||||
//! Otherwise, if \\(\mathcal E\\) has cofactor \\(8\\), as in the
|
||||
//! Curve25519 case, we use the torquing procedure to lift \\(\mathcal E
|
||||
//! / \mathcal E[4]\\) to \\(\mathcal E / \mathcal E[2]\\), and then
|
||||
//! apply the encoding for \\( \[2\](\mathcal E) / \mathcal E[2] \\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## The Ristretto Encoding
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! We can write the above encoding/decoding procedure concretely (in affine
|
||||
//! coordinates) as follows:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ### Encoding
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! On input \\( (x,y) \in \[2\](\mathcal E)\\), a representative for a
|
||||
//! coset in \\( \[2\](\mathcal E) / \mathcal E[4] \\):
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 1. Check if \\( xy \\) is negative or \\( x = 0 \\); if so, torque
|
||||
//! the point by setting \\( (x,y) \gets (x,y) + P_4 \\), where
|
||||
//! \\(P_4\\) is a \\(4\\)-torsion point.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 2. Check if \\(x\\) is negative or \\( y = -1 \\); if so, set
|
||||
//! \\( (x,y) \gets (x,y) + (0,-1) = (-x, -y) \\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 3. Compute $$ s = +\sqrt {(-a) \frac {1 - y} {1 + y} }, $$ choosing
|
||||
//! the positive square root.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The output is then the (canonical) byte-encoding of \\(s\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! If \\(\mathcal E\\) has cofactor \\(4\\), we skip the first step,
|
||||
//! since our input already represents a coset in
|
||||
//! \\( \[2\](\mathcal E) / \mathcal E[2] \\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! To see that this corresponds to the encoding procedure above, notice
|
||||
//! that the first step lifts from \\( \mathcal E / \mathcal E[4] \\) to
|
||||
//! \\(\mathcal E / \mathcal E[2]\\). To understand steps 2 and 3,
|
||||
//! notice that the \\(y\\)-coordinate of \\(\theta(s,t)\\) is
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! y = \frac {1 + as\^2}{1 - as\^2},
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! so that the \\(s\\)-coordinate of \\(\theta\^{-1}(x,y)\\) has
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! s\^2 = (-a)\frac {1-y}{1+y}.
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! Since
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! x = \frac 1 {\sqrt {ad - 1}} \frac {2s} {t},
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! we also have
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \frac s t = x \frac {\sqrt {ad-1}} 2,
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! so that the sign of \\(s/t\\) is determined by the sign of \\(x\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Recall that to choose a canonical representative of \\( (s,t) +
|
||||
//! \mathcal J[2] \\), it's sufficient to make two sign choices: the
|
||||
//! sign of \\(s\\) and the sign of \\(s/t\\). Step 2 determines the
|
||||
//! sign of \\(s/t\\), while step 3 computes \\(s\\) and determines its
|
||||
//! sign (by choosing the positive square root). Finally, the check
|
||||
//! that \\(y \neq -1\\) prevents division-by-zero when encoding the
|
||||
//! identity; it falls out of the optimized formulas below.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ### Decoding
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! On input `s_bytes`, decoding proceeds as follows:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 1. Decode `s_bytes` to \\(s\\); reject if `s_bytes` is not the
|
||||
//! canonical encoding of \\(s\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 2. Check whether \\(s\\) is negative; if so, reject.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 3. Compute
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! y \gets \frac {1 + as\^2}{1 - as\^2}.
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 4. Compute
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! x \gets +\sqrt{ \frac{4s\^2} {ad(1+as\^2)\^2 - (1-as\^2)\^2}},
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! choosing the positive square root, or reject if the square root does
|
||||
//! not exist.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 5. Check whether \\(xy\\) is negative or \\(y = 0\\); if so, reject.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Encoding in Extended Coordinates
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The formulas above are given in affine coordinates, but the usual
|
||||
//! internal representation is extended twisted Edwards coordinates \\(
|
||||
//! (X:Y:Z:T) \\) with \\( x = X/Z \\), \\(y = Y/Z\\), \\(xy = T/Z \\).
|
||||
//! Selecting the distinguished representative of the coset
|
||||
//! requires the affine coordinates \\( (x,y) \\), and computing \\( s
|
||||
//! \\) requires an inverse square root.
|
||||
//! As inversions are expensive, we'd like to be able to do this
|
||||
//! whole computation with only one inverse square root, by batching
|
||||
//! together the inversion and the inverse square root.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! However, it is not obvious how to do this, since the inverse square
|
||||
//! root computation depends on the affine coordinates (which select the
|
||||
//! distinguished representative).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! In what follows we consider only the case
|
||||
//! \\(a = -1\\); a similar argument applies to the case \\( a = 1\\).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Since \\(y = Y/Z\\), in extended coordinates the formula for \\(s\\) becomes
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! s = \sqrt{ \frac{ 1 - Y/Z}{1+Y/Z}} = \sqrt{\frac{Z - Y}{Z+Y}}
|
||||
//! = \frac {Z - Y} {\sqrt{Z\^2 - Y\^2}}.
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Here \\( (X:Y:Z:T) \\) are the coordinates of the distinguished
|
||||
//! representative of the coset.
|
||||
//! Write \\( (X\_0 : Y\_0 : Z\_0 : T\_0) \\)
|
||||
//! for the coordinates of the initial representative. Then the
|
||||
//! torquing procedure in step 1 replaces \\( (X\_0 : Y\_0 : Z\_0 :
|
||||
//! T\_0) \\) by \\( (iY\_0 : iX\_0 : Z\_0 : -T\_0) \\). This means we
|
||||
//! want to obtain either
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! \frac {1} { \sqrt{Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2}}
|
||||
//! \quad \text{or} \quad
|
||||
//! \frac {1} { \sqrt{Z\_0\^2 + X\_0\^2}}.
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! We can relate these using the identity
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! (a-d)X\^2Y\^2 = (Z\^2 - aX\^2)(Z\^2 - Y\^2),
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! which is valid for all curve points. To see this, recall from the curve equation that
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! -dX\^2Y\^2 = Z\^4 - aZ\^2X\^2 - Z\^2Y\^2,
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! so that
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//! (a-d)X\^2Y\^2 = Z\^4 - aZ\^2X\^2 - Z\^2Y\^2 + aX\^2Y\^2 = (Z\^2 - Y\^2)(Z\^2 + X\^2).
|
||||
//! $$
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The encoding procedure is as follows:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! 1. \\(u\_1 \gets (Z\_0 + Y\_0)(Z\_0 - Y\_0) = Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2 \\)
|
||||
//! 2. \\(u\_2 \gets X\_0 Y\_0 \\)
|
||||
//! 3. \\(I \gets \mathrm{invsqrt}(u\_1 u\_2\^2) = 1/\sqrt{X\_0\^2 Y\_0\^2 (Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2)} \\)
|
||||
//! 4. \\(D\_1 \gets u\_1 I = \sqrt{(Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2)/(X\_0\^2 Y\_0\^2)} \\)
|
||||
//! 5. \\(D\_2 \gets u\_2 I = \pm \sqrt{1/(Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2)} \\)
|
||||
//! 6. \\(Z\_{inv} \gets D\_1 D\_2 T\_0 = (u\_1 u\_2)/(u\_1 u\_2\^2) T\_0 = T\_0 / X\_0 Y\_0 = 1/Z\_0 \\)
|
||||
//! 7. If \\( T\_0 Z\_{inv} = x\_0 y\_0 \\) is negative:
|
||||
//! 1. \\( X \gets iY\_0 \\)
|
||||
//! 2. \\( Y \gets iX\_0 \\)
|
||||
//! 3. \\( D \gets D\_1 / \sqrt{a-d} = 1/\sqrt{Z\_0\^2 + X\_0\^2} \\)
|
||||
//! 8. Otherwise:
|
||||
//! 1. \\( X \gets X\_0 \\)
|
||||
//! 2. \\( Y \gets Y\_0 \\)
|
||||
//! 3. \\( D \gets D\_2 = \pm \sqrt{1/(Z\_0\^2 - Y\_0\^2)} \\)
|
||||
//! 9. If \\( X Z\_{inv} = x \\) is negative, set \\( Y \gets - Y\\)
|
||||
//! 10. Compute \\( s \gets (Z - Y) D = (Z - Y) / \sqrt{Z\^2 - Y\^2} \\) and return.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Decoding to Extended Coordinates
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Equality Testing
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Elligator
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## The Double-Ristretto Encoding
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! It's possible to do batch encoding of \\( [2]P \\) using the dual
|
||||
//! isogeny \\(\hat{\theta}\\). Defer this for now.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## ???
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
use core::fmt::Debug;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue