From 4cd8ffd7976f3b0e0d072b5aa1d8ae556f3a98b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Isis Lovecruft Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:19:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Explain the baseline "readability" in comparison. --- README.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 8510b57..e4db7d4 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -74,9 +74,10 @@ included in the SUPERCOP benchmarking suite (albeit their numbers are for the older Nehalem microarchitecture). Additionally, thanks to Rust, this implementation has both type and memory -safety. Not to mention that it's readable for everyone, making ours arguable -more readily auditable. We're of the opinion that these features—combined -with speed—are ultimately more valuable than sole cycle count. +safety. It's also easily readable a much larger set of people than those who +can read qhasm, making it more readily and more easily auditable. We're of +the opinion that, ultimately, these features—combined with speed—are more +valuable than simply cycle counts alone. # Warnings